4
04
KARAKHANOV et al.
1
b-CD-6. H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm) 5.75 (OH-2), perature. The solvent was distilled off to dryness on a
6
1
3
5
6
‡,b
5
.65 (éç-3), 4.9 (C ç), 3.6–3.64 (C ç, C ç, C ç , rotary evaporator, and the resulting viscous white mate-
4
-
é-ëç -ëçéç-ëç éç), 3.4 (C ç), 3.39 (-é-ëç - rial was dissolved in acetone and precipitated with
2 2 2
2 13
ëçéç-ëç éç), 3.2 (C ç); C NMR (DMSO-d , water. The product was filtered off.
2
6
1
4
ppm): 101.76 (ë ). 81.5 (ë ), 74.5 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-
1
2
From the H NMR spectrum, it follows that the
3
2
ëç éç), 72.9 (ë ), 72.3 (ë ), 72.1 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-
2
2
degree of substitution of hydroxyl groups is close to
5
ëç éç), 71.9 (ë ), 66.7 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëç éç),
1
2
2
2
50%. The yield was 91.5%. H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm)
6
6
5
1
9.86 (ë ). MALDI–TOF (m/z): 1157, 1231, 1305,
6
4
.06, 5.6, 5.3 (-CH=CH ); 5.76 (OH-2); 5.61 (éç-3);
2
1 3 5
379, 1453, 1527, 2347, 2421; LC–MS–ESI (target
.92 (C ç); 4.12 (-CH -CH=CH ) 3.7–3.6 (C ç, C ç,
2 2
6 ‡,· 4 2
mass at m/z 1500): 1157, 1253, 1327, 1401, 1475,
C ç ); 3.4–3.2 (C ç, C ç). MALDI–TOF (m/z):
1
549, 2369, 2443.
1
375.5, 1415.5, 1455.5, 1495.5. 11535.5, 1575.5,
1
b-CD-3, b-CD-4 (template). H NMR (DMSO-d , 116115.5, 1655.5.
6
1
ppm) 5.75 (OH-2), 5.65 (éç-3), 4.9 (C ç), 3.6–3.64
Per(bromopropyl)-β-cyclodextrin was prepared as
follows. Gaseous HBr was passed through a solution of
perallyl-β-cyclodextrin persulfonic acid in CH Cl at
3
5
6
‡,b
(
C ç, C ç, C ç , -é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-
2
4
CH OH), 3.4 (C ç), 3.38 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-
2
2
2
2
2
13
CH OH), 3.2 (C ç); C NMR (DMSO-d , ppm):
2
6
room temperature for 1.5 h. The solvent was distilled
off and the products was purified by reprecipitation
from acetone. The yield was 90%. According to
1
4
1
01.76 (ë ), 81.5 (ë ), 75.0 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-
2
3
CH OH), 72.9 (ë ), 72.5 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-
2
2
2
5
CH OH), 72.3 (ë ), 71.9 (ë ), 64.2 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-
1
2
2
H NMR data, the addition involved a half of allyl
6
ëçéH-CH OH), 59.86 (ë ). MALDI–TOF (m/z):
2
groups. The relative amount of the bromide produced
via the addition to the terminal allyl atom was 80%.
1
157, 1261, 1365, 1469, 1573, 2377, 2481, 2585, 2689;
LC–MS–ESI (target mass at m/z 1500): 1157, 1283,
1
H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm) 6.06, 5.6, 5.3 (-CH=CH );
6
2
1
387, 1595, 2399, 2503, 2607, 2711.
1
5
.76 (OH-2); 5.61 (éç-3); 4.92 (C ç); 4.12 (-CH -
2
3 5 6 ‡,·
1
b-CD-7. H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm) 5.75 (OH-2), CH=CH
) 3.9–3.5 (-CH
-CHBr-CH
-CH -CH Br); 1.85 (CH
-CHBr-CH ). MALDI–TOF (m/z):
, C ç, C ç, C ç );
6
2
2
3
1
3
5
6
‡,b
4
5
-
-
.65 (éç-3), 4.9 (C ç), 3.6–3.64 (C ç, C ç, C ç , 3.5–3.2 (C ç, -CH
2
2
2
2
-CH
-
2
4
é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-CH -OH), 3.4 (C ç), 3.38 CH
Br), 1.72 (-CH
2
2
2
2
3
2
13
é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-CH -OH); 3.2 (C ç);
C
1657.5, 1739.4, 1819.3, 1901.2, 1981.2.
2
2
1
4
NMR (DMSO-d , ppm): 101.76 (ë ), 81.5 (ë ), 75.0
6
Compound βCD-9 was prepared according to the
3
(
(
(
(
1
1
-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-CH -OH); 72.9 (ë ); 72.5
2 2
2
following procedure. A 9% Na SO aqueous solution
2
3
-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-CH -OH); 72.3 (ë ); 71.9
2
2
(10 ml) was slowly added with vigorous stirring to a
solution of per(bromopropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (0.80 g)
in ethanol (10 ml). The resulting mixture was refluxed
for 3 days. After the reaction, the solvent was distilled
off to dryness. The product was dissolved in 10 ml of
water, and inorganic salts were precipitated with 50 ml
of acetone. The filtrate solvent was distilled off on a
rotary evaporator. The precipitate was washed with eth-
5
ë ); 64.2 (-é-ëç -ëçéç-ëçéH-CH -OH); 59.86
2
2
6
ë ). MALDI–TOF (m/z): 1157, 1261, 1365, 1469,
573, 2377, 2481; LC–MS–ESI (target mass at m/z
500): 1157, 1283, 1387, 1595, 2399, 2503.
1
b-CD-5 (template). H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm)
6
1
DGD-
5
.75 (OH-2), 5.65 (éç-3), 4.9 (C ç), 3.87 (-C
3 5 6 ‡,b DGD
HOH-), 3.6–3.64 (C ç, C ç, C ç , -C H -), 3.4
2
4
2
13
anol and purified by means of dialysis. Yield 0.4 g.
(
C ç), 3.2 (C ç); C NMR (DMSO-d , ppm): 101.76
6
1 4 DGD 3 2
1
H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm) 6.06, 5.6, 5.3 (-CH=CH );
(
ë ), 81.5 (ë ), 74.8 (-C H -), 72.9 (ë ), 72.3 (ë ),
6
2
2
1
5
DGD
6
5
.76 (OH-2); 5.61 (éç–3); 4.92 (C ç); 4.12 (-CH -
2
3 5
7
1.9 (ë ), 69.9 (-C HOH-), 59.86 (ë ). MALDI–
CH=CH ) 3.9–3.5 (-CH -CHSO Na-CH , C ç, C ç,
TOF (m/z): 1157, 1379, 1469, 1601, 1823; LC–MS–
ESI (target mass at m/z 1500): 1157, 1401, 1623.
2
2
3
3
6
‡,·
4
C ç ); 3.5–3.2 (C ç, -CH -CH -CH SO Na); 2.18
2
2
2
3
1
(CH
2
-CH
2
-CH
2
SO
3
Na), 1.79 (-CH
2
-CHSO Na-CH )1.
3 3
b-CD-8. H NMR (DMSO-d , ppm) 5.75 (OH-2),
6
1
DGD
MALDI–TOF (m/z): 1870.4, 1766.5, 1661.5.
5
.65 (éç-3), 4.9 (C ç), 3.87 (-C HOH-), 3.6–3.64
3 5 6 ‡,b DGD 4 2
In catalytic experiments, iron(III) chloride and
vanadyl sulfate were used as components.
(
C ç, C ç, C ç , -C H -), 3.4 (C ç), 3.2 (C ç);
2
1 4
1
3
C NMR (DMSO-d , ppm): 101.76 (ë ), 81.5 (ë ),
6
DGD
3
2
5
7
4.8 (-C H -), 72.9 (ë ), 72.3 (ë ), 71.9 (ë ), 69.9
The coupling reaction of 2-naphthol was carried out
2
DGD
6
(
-C HOH-), 59.86 (ë ). MALDI–TOF (m/z): 1157, in the 1 : 1 (vol.) water–dichloroethane biphasic system
1
379, 1469, 1601, 1823; LC–MS–ESI (target mass at with intense stirring at atmospheric pressure, a temper-
m/z 1500): 1157, 1401, 1623.
ature of 60°ë, and ratios between the catalyst compo-
,6-Perallyl-β-cyclodextrin was prepared as fol-
lows. β-Cyclodextrin (2g, 1.76 mmol) and dry DMF
100 ml) were placed in a three-necked flask (250 ml)
nents of 2-naphthol : FeCl : β-CD = 20 : 40 : 1 and of
2
3
2
-naphthol : VOSO : β-CD = 5 : 1 : 1.
4
(
The catalyst system was prepared according to the
equipped with a reflux condenser, a dropping funnel, following general procedure. A 10-ml flat-bottomed
and an argon supply system. Sodium hydride (0.963 g glass flask was charged with the components of the cat-
in oil mull) was added. To the mixture stirred with a alytic system in calculated amounts: 50 mg of 2-naph-
magnetic stirrer, allyl bromide (2.6 ml, 30 mmol) was thol and distilled water and dichloroethane, 1 ml each;
added and the reaction continued for 24 h at room tem- the reaction mixture was stirred upon heating. At cer-
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 47 No. 6 2007