R. Sakurai et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 23 (2012) 221–224
223
Table 2
a
Resolution of (RS)-1 with (S)-2 in alcoholic solvents
Entry Solvent (w/w) Dielectric constantb
(e
)
Solvent volume versus (RS)-1 (w/w) Yield (%) de (%) Resolution efficiency (E) Absolute configuration of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2-PrOH
EtOH
18
24
26
27
28
33
38
47
30
30
33
33
22
6
33
27
22
26
16
22
11
11
51
89
93
88
94
91
82
46
34
48
41
46
30
40
18
10
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
96% EtOH
95% EtOH
92% EtOH
MeOH
90% MeOH
70% MeOH
4
4
a
Resolving agent (S)-2/(RS)-1 = 1.0 (molar ratio).
Dielectric constant (e) of a mixed solvent is indicated as a weighted average value calculated from those of pure solvents.
b
1
00
3
in CH CN (0.5 mL) was added to the solution. The mixture was al-
lowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature, after which N-
acylation proceeded to yield N-acyl 1. To the solution were added
8
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
.0% phosphoric acid solution (0.1 mL) and CH
then the insolubles were removed by filtration. The filtrate (5
was injected into the HPLC. Analytical conditions for the HPLC
were as follows; eluent: 0.03% NH aq solution (acidified with ace-
tic acid to pH 4.9) + methanol (50/50), 1.0 mL/min, 40 °C, detected
at 254 nm, injection sample 5 L. Retention times: the (S)-enantio-
mer 39.4 min, the (R)-enantiomer 42.5 min. The sample for diaste-
3
CN (2.5 mL), and
lL)
3
l
-
-
-
-
20
40
60
80
reomeric excess analysis by HPLC was treated with
injection.
L-PTAN prior to
-
100
4.3. Resolution procedure
1
0
20
30
40
50
Dielectric constant (ε)
4.3.1. Preparation of the (S)-1/2(S)-2 salt
A typical experimental procedure involving the preparation of
Figure 3. Configuration change with the solvent dielectric constant.
(S)-1/2(S)-2 salt is as follows (Table 1, entry 11): to a 300 mL flask,
free diamine (RS)-1 (3.0 g, 30.0 mmol) and ethanol (90 g) were
added. The solution was stirred, and then (S)-2 (9.6 g, 30.0 mmol)
was added at room temperature, and heated up to approximately
that this resolution of di-amine 1 with (S)-2 was the first example
of a DCR phenomenon. This result suggests that the DCR phenom-
enon might be observed in other types of compounds, not only in
mono-amino compounds.
6
0 °C to give a clear solution. The mixture was gradually cooled
to 37 °C, kept for 2 h at 36–38 °C (corresponding to the crystalliza-
tion temperature), and then gradually cooled again to 20 °C. After
aging the suspension at the same temperature for 2 h, the crystals
were filtered off and washed twice with ethanol (8 mL in total) to
yield wet salt crystals, which were dried at 60 °C for 3 h to afford
the crude (S)-1/2(S)-2 salt (6.0 g, 8.12 mmol, yield 27%, 89% de, E
4
4
. Experimental
.1. General
4
8%).
The crude salt was recrystallized from ethanol. To a 500 mL
(
RS)-3-Aminopiperidine 1 (containing 1.7% of water) and N-to-
syl-(S)-phenylalanine 2 (>99.5% ee) were made by Yamakawa
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd (Tokyo). H NMR spectra were recorded
on a JEOL ECA-500 spectrometer in CD OD. IR spectra were mea-
3
sured on a SHIMADZU FTIR-8400S spectrometer using KBr pellets.
Optical rotations were measured on a JASCO P-1010 polarimeter.
High-performance liquid chromatography was performed by a JAS-
CO Intelligent HPLC system equipped with UV-2075 detector.
Melting points were determined with a Yanaco MP-S3 instrument
and are uncorrected.
flask, (S)-1/2(S)-2 salt (5.0 g, 6.77 mmol) and ethanol (230 g) were
added. The suspension was stirred, then heated up to approxi-
mately 72 °C to give a clear solution. The solution was then gradu-
ally cooled, seeded (2 mg) at 71 °C, kept for 2 h at 62–64 °C
1
(
corresponding to the crystallization temperature), and then
cooled again to 20 °C. After leaving the suspension at this temper-
ature overnight, the crystals were filtered off and washed twice
with ethanol (8 mL in total) to give wet salt crystals, which were
dried at 60 °C for 3 h to afford pure (S)-1/2(S)-2 salt (4.4 g, yield
8
8%, 96% de). Analytical data for the recrystallized salt are as fol-
2
5
4
.2. Determination of diastereomeric excess of 1 in the salt
lows. (S)-1/2(S)-2: ½
aꢁ
¼ ꢂ7:0 (c 0.01, MeOH/H O = 1/1); 96% de;
D
2
ꢂ1
Mp 193.0–195.0 °C; IR (KBr) cm : 3449, 3211, 3185, 1655, 1551,
1
The diastereomeric excess (de%) of the salt was based on the
1524, 1390, 1323, 1162; H NMR (CD OD, 500 MHz): d 7.55–7.53
3
enantiomeric excess (ee%) of 1 liberated from the salt. The enantio-
meric excess of 1 was determined by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-2
(4H, m), 7.22 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.18–7.12 (10H, m), 3.82 (2H, dd,
J = 7.5, 5.0 Hz), 3.36 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 4.0 Hz), 3.30–3.26 (1H, m),
3.15 (1H, dt, J = 13.0, 4.0 Hz), 3.01 (2H, dd, J = 13.5, 5.0 Hz), 2.86–
2.81 (1H, m), 2.84 (2H, dd, J = 13.5, 7.5 Hz), 2.81 (1H, dd, J = 12.0,
10.0 Hz), 2.09–2.03 (1H, m), 1.94 (1H, dquit, J = 15.0, 4.0 Hz), 1.70
(1H, dtt, J = 15.0, 11.0, 4.0 Hz), 1.55 (1H, dtd, J = 13.0, 11.0,
4.0 Hz); Anal. Calcd for C37H46N O S (FW 738.91): C, 60.14; H,
column (GL Science, 5
the enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC analysis was as fol-
low: (R)-1/2(S)-2/H 80 mg [(0.106 mmol), containing (R)-1
10 mg)] was placed in a vial to which 1 M NaOH aq (0.6 mL) and
lm, 4.6 ꢀ 150 mm). Sample preparation for
2
O
(
CH
3
CN (5 mL) were added. The solution (0.1 mL) was transferred
-tartaric acid anhydride ( -PTAN)
4
8 2
to a vial, and 0.8% di-p-toluoyl-
L
L
6.27; N, 7.58. Found C, 60.14; H, 6.13; N, 7.63.