ISSN 0036ꢀ0236, Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 564–568. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
Original Russian Text © K.V. Mishchenko, Yu.M. Yukhin, I.A. Vorsina, 2012, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2012, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 628–632.
PHYSICAL METHODS
OF INVESTIGATION
Interaction of Bismuth(III) Oxide with Formic Acid Solutions
K. V. Mishchenko, Yu. M. Yukhin, and I. A. Vorsina
Institute of SolidꢀState Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
Received January 25, 2011
Abstract—The interaction of bismuth(III) oxide with formic acid solutions at 22 and 55 C was studied using
°
Xꢀray powder diffraction, thermogravimetry, electron microscopy, IR spectroscopy, and chemical analysis.
Solubility curves were found to comprise two branches due to formates of compositions Bi(COOH)3 and
BiOCOOH forming in the system. Thermal decomposition of bismuth formates is shown to be a promising
route for the synthesis of metallic bismuth, as well as of tetragonal (
β
) and monoclinic ( ) bismuth oxides.
α
DOI: 10.1134/S0036023612040201
Bismuth carboxylates are used in the synthesis of muth oxide with 30 mL of formic acid solution under
boiling for 10 min.
bismuthꢀcontaining oxide materials (superconductor,
ferroelectrics, piezoelectrics, catalysts, and other materiꢀ
als) and bismuthꢀcontaining medicaments [1–3]. In this
context, it is pertinent to develop simple and reliable
methods for preparing these materials. Bismuth forꢀ
mate is the best studied bismuth carboxylate; its low
decomposition makes it a promising precursor for preꢀ
paring both metallic bismuth and bismuth oxide.
Here, we study the interaction of bismuth oxide
with formic acid solutions of various concentrations at
22 1 and 55 2
°С.
EXPERIMENTAL
The reagents used in the study were formic acid
(pure for analysis grade) and bismuth(III) oxide
(highꢀpurity grade). The reaction of bismuth oxide
with formic acid was carried out in Teflon or glass vesꢀ
sels equipped with stirrers; the vessels were thermoꢀ
stated on WBꢀ2 water baths. The initial reagent ratio
was 10 g of Bi2O3 per 100 mL of HCOOH solution of
Chaplygina [4] in studying solubility in the normal
bismuth formate–formic acid system, discovered the forꢀ
mation of two compounds: Bi(HCOO)3 and BiOHCOO.
According to Stalhandske [5], tribismuth formate is a
layered polymeric structure that belongs to the trigonal
crystal system,
328 Å3
= 3. According to Aurivillius [6], the bismuth
oxoformate structure is built of double
R3m, a = 10.566 Å, c = 4.1193 Å, V =
,
Z
2+
IR peak frequencies (cm–1) for bismuth(III) formate, bisꢀ
muth oxoformate, and free formate ion
layers
Bi2O2
interlayered with formate ions. The crystal structure is
tetragonal, 4/nmm = 3.89 = 10.16
= 154 Å3
= 2. Bismuth oxoformate was also structurally studied
in [4, 7], where = 3.9145, = 33.58 Å [7]. Pisarevskii
P
,
a
Å,
c
Å,
V
,
Assignment
[13]
–
Bi(HCOOH) BiOHCOO [O CH] [13]
3
2
Z
a
c
2940 vw
2850 vw
1565 vs
1410 s
2820 w
2803
ν
CH
et al. [8] mentioned that the reported methods of bisꢀ
muth formate synthesis, which are based on the reacꢀ
tion of bismuth oxide or carbonate and metallic bisꢀ
muth with formic acid, do not provide any significant
bismuth formate yields because of its very low solubilꢀ
ity in formic acid. Pisarevskii et al. [8] proposed to
synthesize bismuth formate by reacting bismuth aceꢀ
tate with a 100ꢀfold excess of formic acid. The syntheꢀ
sis of precursor bismuth acetate uses acetic anhydride,
which is hard to obtain. Usually, bismuth formate is
prepared by crystallization from bismuth oxide soluꢀ
tions in formic acid by boiling and cooling the initial
solution [5, 6, 9]; the final bismuth product yield is not
high because of the low solubility of the oxide in forꢀ
mic acid. However, Anishchenko et al. [10] showed
the feasibility of preparing bismuth formate by a
solid–solution reaction as a result of treating 2 g of bisꢀ
1560 vs
–
1585
1383
1354
ν
as(CO )
2
δ
as(HCO)
s(CO )
1350 s
1380 w sh
1350 sh
1310 m
1290 w sh
1090 vw
760 m
ν
2
1100 vw
800 m
780 m
–
1060
700
π
(HCO )
2
δ
s(HCO)
550 m, br
–
ν(BiO)
Note: Band notations: s—strong; m—medium intensity; w—
weak; v—very; sh—shoulder; br—broad. Vibration notaꢀ
tions:
ν
—stretching;
δ
—bending; —outꢀofꢀplane.
π
564