C. J. Stearman, V. Behar / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1943–1946
1945
b-methylstyrene oxide at 10 mol% catalyst loading.
Unfortunately, no measure of the enantiomeric excess
was reported. Increasing the catalyst loading to 30
mol% gave 80% conversion and 88% e.e.1a The reac-
tions with catalysts 4–8 were all run under the same
conditions with 10 mol% catalyst at pH 9.3 and −15°C.
Parent ketone 4 epoxidized trans-b-methylstyrene to
35% conversion with 46% e.e. This was encouraging
since the non-fluorinated version of Denmark’s catalyst
3 only proceeded to about 5% conversion under similar
conditions. This was the first indication that we had a
more reactive catalyst.
oxide as a colorless to slightly yellow liquid. Conversion
of trans-b-methylstyrene to trans-b-methylstyrene oxide
1
was measured by H NMR at 400 MHz. Enantioselec-
tivity was determined by HPLC (Chiralcel OD).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the
Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant C-14189), the
donors of the Petroleum Research Fund, administered
by the ACS, and William Marsh Rice University.
Monofluorinated ketone 5 drove the reaction to 57%
conversion, and further increased the enantiomeric
excess to 80%. The trend continued with the a,a%-
difluorinated catalyst 6 completely converting the sub-
strate to epoxide with 86% e.e. The effect of additional
fluorination leveled off and trifluoroketone catalyst 7
offered no improvement in the enantiomeric excess
though the conversion to epoxide was still complete.
Denmark had previously shown that fluorinated cyclo-
hexanone derivatives that were conformationally con-
strained showed a dramatic stereoelectronic effect, with
axial fluorination resulting in little activation of the
ketone moiety.11 This is consistent with the third
fluorine atom in catalyst 7 presumably occupying a
pseudoaxial position, thus offering no advantage com-
pared to difluorinated catalyst 6. Tetrafluorinated
ketone 8, which exists almost exclusively as the hydrate,
gave results similar to parent ketone 4. The strong
preference for formation of the hydrate makes catalyst
8 less available for dioxirane formation and hence the
drop in conversion and enantiomeric excess.
References
1. (a) Denmark, S. E.; Wu, Z. Synlett 1999, S1, 847–859; (b)
Frohn, M.; Shi, Y. Synthesis 2000, 1979–2000; (c) Tian,
H. Q.; She, X. G.; Xu, J. X.; Shi, Y. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
1929–1931; (d) Wang, Z. M.; Miller, S. M.; Anderson, O.
P.; Shi, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 521–530; (e) Tian, H.
Q.; She, X. G.; Shi, Y. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 715–718; (f)
Yang, D.; Jiao, G.-S.; Yip, T.-C.; Lai, T.-H.; Wong,
M.-K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4619–4624.
2. (a) Imai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda,
I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4343–4346; (b) Kobayashi,
S.; Kusakabe, K.; Ishitani, H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1225–
1227; (c) Miyashita, A.; Yasuda, A.; Takaya, H.; Tori-
umi, K.; Ito, T.; Souchi, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 7932–7934; (d) Ogasawara, M.; Yoshida,
K.; Kamei, H.; Kato, K.; Uozumi, Y.; Hayashi, T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1779–1787; (e) Pfaltz,
A.; Pretot, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 323–325;
(f) Rosini, C.; Franzini, L.; Raffaelli, A.; Salvadori, P.
Synthesis 1992, 503–517; (g) Uozumi, Y.; Kato, K.;
Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5063–5064.
3. Yang, D.; Yip, T.-C.; Wang, X.-C.; Tang, M.-W.; Zheng,
J.-H.; Cheung, K.-K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
5943–5952.
4. (a) Nogami, H.; Matsunaga, S.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 279–283; (b) Huang,
W.-S.; Hu, Q.-S.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7940–
7956; (c) Bayston, D. J.; Fraser, J. L.; Ashton, M. R.;
Baxter, A. D.; Polywka, M. E. C.; Moses, E. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 3137–3140.
5. (a) Yang, D.; Wang, X.-C.; Wong, M.-K.; Yip, T.-C.;
Tang, M.-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11311–11312;
(b) Yang, D.; Tang, M.-W.; Wong, M.-K.; Zheng, J.-H.;
Cheung, K.-K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 491–492.
6. Song, C. E.; Lee, K. C.; Lee, S.; Jin, B. W. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2921–2926.
In the screening process we have identified a,a%-difluori-
nated ketone 6 to contain the optimal degree of fluori-
nation for catalytic asymmetric epoxidation. The
activity of this catalyst in the epoxidation of trans-b-
methylstyrene is the highest to date for biaryl-based
ketone epoxidation catalysts. The next goal is to define
the scope of substrates accepted by this catalyst system.
Additionally, attachment to a solid support to facilitate
catalyst recycling is under active investigation.
General epoxidation procedure: To a 10 mL round-bot-
tomed flask were added tetrabutylammonium hydrogen
sulfate (1.0 mg, 0.002 mmol), trans-b-methylstyrene
(0.250 mL, 0.05 mmol, 0.2 M in DME) and a solution
of ketone (4–8) (0.250 mL, 0.005 mmol, 0.02 M in
DME) followed by 0.4 mL buffer (prepared: 0.5 mL
acetic acid added to 100 mL 0.1 M aqueous K2CO3).
Using a well salted ice bath, the reaction mixture was
cooled to −15°C. While vigorously stirring the above
solution, solutions of K2CO3 (0.2 mL, 1.44 M in water)
and Oxone (0.2 mL, 0.34 M in 1×10−4 M aq.
Na2EDTA) were delivered simultaneously via separate
syringes over a 3.5 h period using a syringe pump.
Immediately following the addition, the reaction was
quenched by dilution with ether and water. The water
layer was extracted with ether three times. The com-
bined organics were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and con-
centrated in vacuo to afford trans-b-methylstyrene
7. Mislow, K.; McGinn, F. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80,
6036–6037.
8. Ohta, T.; Ito, M.; Inagaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 1615–1616.
9. (a) Possel, O.; van Leusen, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977,
4229–4232; (b) Tichy, M.; Holanova, J.; Zavada, J. Tet-
rahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3497–3504.
10. (a) Differding, E.; Lang, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 6087–6090; (b) Enders, D.; Potthoff, M.; Raabe, G.;
Runsink, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2362–
2364.