a Ni metal IO annealed without the electrochemically-deposited
Ni(OH) film showed 3-fold less capacitance than that of the
capacitance versus cycle number, is presented in Fig. 4b. The
capacitance of the Ni–NiO IO electrode increases slightly with
cycling, which could be ascribed to a slow infiltration of
electrolyte into the nanopores within the NiO layer during
the cycling process. The weight of the NiO active material was
estimated from the structural parameters of the IO films. From
the FCC lattice, pore size (ca. 300 nm), and NiO shell
layer thickness (ca. 12 Æ 4 nm), we estimate that the specific
capacitance of the Ni–NiO IO electrode was about
2
NiO deposited film, suggesting that the electrochemically-
prepared NiO has stronger capacitive behavior than that from
oxidized Ni metal. Fig. 3b shows the scan-rate dependence of
the capacitance of the Ni–NiO IO electrode. The rate
capability of a NiO NP film with a similar film thickness is
also plotted in Fig. 3b for comparison. The IO electrode
exhibits a higher rate capability than the NP electrode. At
À1
À1
the highest scan rate (500 mV s ), the capacitance of the IO
À1
96 Æ 32 F g , in agreement with those reported for other NiO
10,11,13–15
electrodes. It is expected that the specific capacitance
of the IO electrodes could be further enhanced by optimizing
electrode is maintained up to 80% of that at 5 mV s , versus
only 50% for the NP electrode. The faster charge/discharge
kinetics of the IO electrode is presumably resulting from the
higher electrical conductivity provided by the Ni metal core
and the greater ionic conductivity afforded by the ordered pore
network in the IO structure. This rapid charge/discharge rate
is an attractive feature for high-power supercapacitor applications,
which are essential for fast energy output applications such as
hybrid electric vehicles.
Ni–NiO IO morphological properties (e.g. pore size, NiO shell
1
layer thickness, and annealing temperature).
1
In summary, Ni–NiO core–shell IO electrodes were fabricated
using electrodeposition within a polystyrene bead template. The
XRD and SEM images confirmed that the periodic IO structure
consisted of a Ni metal core and a NiO shell film in well-ordered
hexagonal symmetry. The specific capacitance of the NiO com-
À1
Fig. 4a shows several cycles of representative voltage
profiles of the Ni–NiO core–shell IO electrodes from galvano-
static charge/discharge measurements performed at a constant
ponent of the Ni–NiO IO electrode was about 96 Æ 32 F g
.
The IO electrode showed better rate capability than the
randomly-mixed NiO NP electrode, which is attributed to the
Ni metal core and the ordered pore network in the IO structure.
These results suggest that the Ni–NiO IO architecture appears to
be a promising electrode architecture for supercapacitors.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of
Energy/National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s Laboratory
Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program under
Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308.
À2
current density (0.2 mA cm ). The shapes of the charge/
discharge curves appeared unchanged during the entire
cycling, suggesting that the NiO microstructure is stable
during the repeated charge/discharge cycles. It is noteworthy
À2
that the shapes of voltage profiles cycled at 1 mA cm
(
Fig. S3, ESIw) are essentially the same as the ones shown in
Fig. 4a. There is no significant current–resistance drop,
suggesting that the Ni–NiO IO electrode is suitable for super-
capacitor applications. Cycle performance of the Ni–NiO IO
electrode for the first 1000 cycles, evaluated by plotting the
Notes and references
1 Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and
Technological Applications, ed. B. E. Conway, Kluwer Academic/
Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999.
2
3
4
5
J. R. Miller and P. Simon, Science, 2008, 321, 651–652.
P. Simon and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 845–854.
J. P. Zheng and T. R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1995, 142, L6–L8.
J. P. Zheng, P. J. Cygan and T. R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1995,
1
42, 2699–2703.
6
7
8
9
S. C. Pang, M. A. Anderson and T. W. Chapman, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 2000, 147, 444–450.
E. Raymundo-Pinero, V. Khomenko, E. Frackowiak and
F. Beguin, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152, A229–A235.
C. Lin, J. A. Ritter and B. N. Popov, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998,
1
45, 4097–4103.
K. C. Liu and M. A. Anderson, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143,
24–130.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 V. Srinivasan and J. W. Weidner, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144,
L210–L213.
1 K. W. Nam, W. S. Yoon and K. B. Kim, Electrochim. Acta, 2002,
4
7, 3201–3209.
2 K. W. Nam, K. H. Kim, E. S. Lee, W. S. Yoon, X. Q. Yang and
K. B. Kim, J. Power Sources, 2008, 182, 642–652.
3 Y. G. Wang and Y. Y. Xia, Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51,
3
223–3227.
4 M. S. Wu, Y. A. Huang, C. H. Yang and H. H. Jow, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32, 4153–4159.
5 D. D. Zhao, M. W. Xu, W. H. Zhou, J. Zhang and H. L. Li,
Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53, 2699–2705.
6 J. H. Kim, K. Zhu, Y. F. Yan, C. L. Perkins and A. J. Frank, Nano
Lett., 2010, 10, 4099–4104.
7 N. D. Denkov, O. D. Velev, P. A. Kralchevsky, I. B. Ivanov,
H. Yoshimura and K. Nagayama, Langmuir, 1992, 8, 3183–3190.
¨
8 N. R. Neale, N. Kopidakis, J. van de Lagemaat, M. Gratzel and
Fig. 4 (a) Typical voltage profiles and (b) cycle performance of the
À2
A. J. Frank, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 23183–23189.
19 N. V. Dziomkina and G. J. Vancso, Soft Matter, 2005, 1, 265–279.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Ni–NiO inverse opal electrode. The current density was 0.2 mA cm
.
5
216 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5214–5216