C. Shiju, D. Arish, N. Bhuvanesh et al.
Polyhedron 205 (2021) 115292
2.2. Preparation of meso-1,2-Diphenylethylenediamine (meso-stien)
nm, ~1100, 640, 385. meff (BM) = 3.11; Molar conductance (Kc
(Ohmꢀ1 cm2molꢀ1) 12.2.
Ammonium acetate (60.0 g, 0.78 mol) and benzaldehyde
(29.0 mL, 0.29 mol) were heated at reflux for 3 h. After allowing
the mixture to cool, the white N-benzoyl-N0-benzylidine-meso-
1,2-diphenylethylenediamine was filtered, washed with several
portions of ethanol, and dried in a vacuum to achive a yield of
[Cu(SN-NNDMB)2Cl2]
Blue, yield ~ 64% (0.69 g) Anal. Calcd. for C64H68Cl2CuN8: C,
70.93, H, 6.32, N, 10.34, Cl, 6.54, Cu, 5.86; Found: C, 70.42, H,
6.62, N, 10.88, Cl, 6.16, Cu, 6.03. FAB-Mass: m/z 1082 [M + 1]. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) m: 1574, 1453, 3194, 463 cmꢀ1. UV–Vis. (CH2Cl2): k/
42%
(12.0
g).
N-benzoyl-N0-benzylidine-meso-1,2
diphenylethylenediamine (5.0 g, 12 mmol) was treated with
60 mL of 70% H2SO4. The mixture immediately turned to a pale
red colour. After refluxing for 1 h, the mixture turned black. The
hot mixture was poured into a 600 mL beaker filled with crushed
ice. After repeated extractions with diethyl ether, the mixture
was made alkaline with NaOH. The resulting solution was
extracted with dichloromethane. The obtained organic layer was
collected, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and filtered.
Stripping CH2Cl2 from the mix resulted in meso-1,2
diphenylethylenediamine(meso-stien) in the form of a pale yellow
solid. The yield was found to be ~ 60% (1.57 g) [17,18]. IR (KBr,
nm, ~690. meff (BM) = 1.96; Molar conductance (K
c(Ohmꢀ1 cm2-
molꢀ1) 14.4.
[Zn(SN-NNDMB)2Cl2]
Light Yellow, yield ~ 65% (0.70 g) Anal. Calcd. for C64H68Cl2ZnN8:
C, 70.81, H, 6.31, N, 10.32, Cl, 6.53, Zn, 6.02; Found: C, 71.21, H,
6.52, N, 10.44, Cl, 6.34, Zn, 5.87. FAB-Mass: m/z 1083 [M + 1]. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) m: 1588, 1438, 3235, 453 cmꢀ1. meff (BM) = Dia; Molar
conductance (K
c(Ohmꢀ1 cm2molꢀ1) 8.2.
cmꢀ1
)
m
: 3337, 3264 (NAH); 1581 (NH2) (out-of-plane), 684. 1H
7.30 (m Ar-CH).
2.5. Physical measurementss
NMR (CDCl3,), d:, 1.34 (s NH2); 3.98 (s CH);
̴
Elemental analysis was performed using a Perkin-Elmer ele-
mental analyzer. The molar conductivity of the complexes was
measured in DMSO (10ꢀ3 M) solutions using a Coronation Digital
Conductivity Meter. The electrospray (ESI) mass spectra were
recorded using a THERMO Finnigan LCQ Advantage max ion trap
2.3. Synthesis of Schiff base ligand (SN-NNDMB)
A mixture of meso-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine (meso-stien)
(5 mmol, 1.06 g) in MeOH (25 mL) was taken in a 100 mL RB flask.
mass spectrometer. Samples of 10 lL dissolved in methanol, chlo-
A
solution of 4-N,N0-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (10 mmol,
roform or dichloromethane were introduced into the ESI source
using Finnigan surveyor autosampler and FAB mass spectra were
acquired using a JEOL JMS600H mass spectrometer. 1H NMR spec-
tra were obtained using a JEOL GSX 400 FT–NMR spectrometer. IR
spectra were recorded using a JASCO FT/IR-410 spectrometer in the
4000–400 cmꢀ1 region. Electronic spectra were acquired using a
Perkin Elmer Lambda-25 UV–VIS spectrometer. Cyclic voltammet-
ric measurements were acquired using a Bio-Analytical System
(BAS) model CV-50 W electrochemical analyzer. Magnetic mea-
surements were performed on a Guoy balance by making diamag-
netic corrections using Pascal’s constant. The three-electrode cells
contain a Ag/AgCl reference, an auxiliary Pt and working glassy
electrodes. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate was used as a sup-
porting electrolyte. Thermal analysis was performed using a SDT
Q 600/V8.3 build 101 thermal analyzer with a heating rate of 20
0C/min in a N2 atmosphere. Powder XRD was performed on a
1.49 g) in MeOH (25 mL) was then added slowly. The reaction mix-
ture was vigorously mixed for about 5 h. The formed precipitate
was collected by vacuum filtration and then washed several times
using anhydrous ether and dried using a desiccator containing
anhydrous CaCl2. The purity of the ligand was analyzed by TLC.
The isolated yield of the ligand was found to be ~ 70% (1.66 g).
Light yellow crystals, 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.8 (s CH = N), 2.9 (s, N-
(CH3)2), 6.6–7.5 (m, ArH), 4.6 (s, CH-N). IR (KBr, cm-1)
(C@N), 1367 (CAN), 1444 (N-CH3), 3025 (Ar CH). Anal. calcd for
32H34N4: C 80.98, H 7.22, N 11.80; found: C 81.21, H 6.85, N
m: 1605
C
12.12. UV–vis (CH2Cl2): k/nm 328, 402. Mass: m/z 475.
2.4. Synthesis of metal complexes
The Schiff base (SN-NNDMB) (2 mmol, 0.95 g) in MeOH (20 mL)
was taken in a 100 mL RB flask. A solution of metal(II) chloride
(1 mmol) in MeOH solution (10 mL) was then added dropwise
and the reaction mixture was stirred for 6 h. The volume of the
reaction mixture was reduced to ½ of the starting volume under
reduced pressure. The formed precipitate was filtered out, washed
several times with ether and with a little cold EtOH, followed by
dried in a vacuum over anhydrous CaCl2.
Rigaku Dmax X-ray diffractometer using Cu-Ka radiation.
A BRUKER GADDS X-ray diffractometer was employed for single
crystal screening, unit cell determination, and data collection. The
detailed method of data reduction, structure solution, and refine-
ment was reported in Ref. [19].
2.6. Antimicrobial activities
[Co(SN-NNDMB)2Cl2]
The antimicrobial efficacy of the synthesized compounds was
tested in vitro against the bacterial species Escherichia coli, Pseu-
domonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureus as
well as the fungal species Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and
Candida albicans using the disc diffusion method. Amikacin, oflox-
acin and ciprofloxacin were used as standards for antibacterial
activity and nystatin was used as a standard for the antifungal
activity. The detailed procedure was reported in Ref. [20].
Green, yield ~ 60% (0.65 g) Anal. Calcd. for C64H68Cl2CoN8: C,
71.23, H, 6.35, N, 10.38, Cl, 6.57, Co, 5.46; Found: C, 70.87, H,
6.07, N, 11.14, Cl, 6.46, Co, 5.35. FAB-Mass: m/z 1078 [M + 1]. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) m: 1587, 1445, 3199, 419 cmꢀ1. UV–Vis. (CH2Cl2): k/
nm, 530–655. meff (BM) = 5.04; Molar conductance (K
c(Ohmꢀ1
cm2molꢀ1) 11.8.
[Ni(SN-NNDMB)2Cl2]
2.7. DNA binding studies
Yellow, yield ~ 68% (0.73 g) Anal. Calcd. for C64H68Cl2NiN8: C,
71.25, H, 6.35, N, 10.39, Cl, 6.57, Ni, 5.44; Found: C, 71.82, H,
6.24, N, 10.56, Cl, 6.22, Ni, 5.25. ESI-Mass: m/z 1077 [M + 1]. IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1) m: 1576, 1454, 3173, 414 cmꢀ1. UV–Vis. (CH2Cl2): k/
2.7.1. Absorption titration experiment
Electronic absorption titrations were performed in a Tris-HCl/
NaCl buffer (5 mmolLꢀ1 Tris-HCl/50 mmolLꢀ1 NaCl buffer pH 7.2)
2