296
LI ET AL.
TABLE 1. Selected physicochemical properties of the soils investigated
Particle size
Soil sample
Sand (%)
Slit (%)
Clay (%)
Total N (%)
Total P (%)
Total K (%)
pHa
Corg (%)
Beijing soil
Heilongjiang soil
15.12
16.75
45.09
51.13
39.79
32.12
0.08
0.19
0.08
0.21
0.97
1.81
7.82
5.86
1.16
3.81
aSuspension of soil in 0.01 M CaCl2, 1:2.5 (w/w).
Rs 5 2(t22t1)/(W1 1 W2). Where t was the retention time and t0 was the
void time at given conditions, k was retention factors, and W was base
widths (subscripts 1 and 2 represent the first and second eluted enan-
tiomers, respectively). Triplicate injections were made for the measure-
ments and the values were the mean of three injections. The samples
were analyzed using a mixture of hexane and ethanol (90:10) as mobile
phase. The flow rate was 0.8 ml/min. Chromatographic separation was
conducted at 208C and DAD detection at 225 nm.
Plant Sample Preparation
A 20 g aliquot of the sample was weighed into a 100-ml teflon centri-
fuge tube with screw caps, 20 ml of acetonitrile was added to the tube
and then homogenized at high speed for 1 min. A 6 g of anhydrous mag-
nesium sulfate (MgSO4) and 1.5 g of sodium chloride (NaCl) were
added, thereafter, the tube was capped and immediately vortexed vigo-
rously for 1 min and then centrifuged for 5 min at 2818g (4000 rpm).
Acetonitrile supernatant (15 ml) was applied to a Cleanert Pesti-Carb/
PSA, which had been formerly conditioned with 10 ml of the elution sol-
vent (acetonitrile/toluene, 3:1, v/v). The column was eluted with 12 ml
of elution solvent. After removal of the solvent in vacuo, the sample was
dissolved in 1 ml of hexane. After filtering thorough a 0.22-lm nylon
syringe filter, an aliquot (50 ll) was injected into HPLC.
To find out the elution order of tetraconazole enantiomers on OJ-H
chiral column, a Waters PrepLCTM 150 Semi Preparative HPLC Purifica-
tion system equipped with
Waters12489 UV/visible detector was applied for preparation of the indi-
vidual enantiomers of tetraconazole.
Waters12707 autosampler
a a
Waters1600 controller pump and
A
equipped with a 100-ll sample loop was used for sample injection. The
column effluent was fractionated using a Waters1 Fraction Collector III.
The signal was received and processed by EmpowerTM data software.
The enantiomers of tetraconazole were separated on a Chiralcel OD-RH
(cellulose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)) chiral column (150 3
4.6 mm2 i.d., Daicel Chemical Industries, Japan) in reverse phase condi-
tion. The chromatographic separation was conducted at 208C. The mobile
phase applied was a mixture of acetonitrile and water (60:40 by volume),
and a flow rate at 0.3 ml/min and a detection wavelength at 210 nm. The
rac-tetraconazole was split into (1) and (2)-enantiomers. The elution
order of the two tetraconazole enantiomers in this system was distin-
guished by an online optical rotation dispersion (ORD) detector (JASCO
OR-2090 Plus, JASCO Corporation, Japan). Then, the two individual sepa-
rated enantiomers were injected and determined by Agilent 1100 HPLC to
find out their elution order on OJ-H chiral column.
Treatment and Incubation of Soils
The test soils from two different agriculture regions (0–15 cm horizon)
of China that had not been treated with tetraconazole in the last 5 years
were used in this study. Their major properties are shown in Table 1.
Air-dried soils at room temperature were sieved through a 2.0-mm sieve.
The moisture content of the test soils was adjusted to 25% and kept in
the dark at 25 (62)8C for 2 weeks activation period. After that period,
batches of 100 g soil (based on dry weight) were weighed into 250-ml
conical flasks. To avoid potential effects of solvents on the soil microbio-
logical activity, the volume of the application solution was limited to
1 ml. The tetraconazole stock solution was applied dropwise to give an
application rate equivalent to 5 mg/kg rac-tetraconazole for per gram
soil. After thorough mixing, the flasks were sealed with cotton-wool
plugs and stored at 25(62)8C in dark. During incubation, distilled water
was added at 1 day intervals to maintain the initial moisture. Fifteen
grams of the treated soil samples (based on dry weight) was removed
for analysis after incubation periods of 0 (2h), 1, 3, 5, 8, 16, 21, 28, 35,
42, and 64 days. Each incubation was carried out in triplicate.
Calibration Curves and Assay Validation
Matrix working standard rac-tetraconazole solutions (0.5–50 mg/l) for
linearities of the two enantiomers were prepared by diluted with blank
matrix. Calibration curves were generated by plotting peak area of each
enantiomer versus the concentration of the enantiomers. Linear regres-
sion analysis was performed using Microsoft1 Excel. The precision and
accuracy of the assay were obtained by comparing the theoretical con-
centration to the actual found concentration of each enantiomer spiked
in blank samples. The relative standard deviations (RSD 5 SD/mean)
were calculated at the calibration range. The intraday precision was
determined in five replicates at different concentrations on the same
day, and the interday precision was evaluated in three replicates at the
earlier concentrations on three different days. Recovery assay was per-
formed in blank plant and soil matrix over three concentration levels for
tetraconazole enantiomers. The samples were extracted, cleaned, and
determined as previously described. The limit of detection (LOD) for
each enantiomer was considered to be the concentration that produced a
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 3, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was
defined on S/N ratio of 10. The concentration of each enantiomer in
samples was calculated by calibration curves of corresponding enan-
tiomer using external standard method.
Extraction and Cleanup Procedures for Soil
A 15 g aliquot of the soil sample was weighed in a 50-ml teflon centri-
fuge tube with screw caps, and 2 ml of mill-Q water was added. After
soaking at room temperature for 60 min, 20 ml acetonitrile was added.
The mixture was homogenized and then salted out, and water was
removed with 4 g MgSO4 and 1 g NaCl as described earlier. A 15 ml of
acetonitrile supernatant was applied to a Supelclean Pesti-Carb, which
was formerly conditioned with 2 3 5 ml elution solvent (acetonitrile/to-
luene, 3:1, v/v). The column was eluted with 2 3 3 ml elution solvent.
After removal of the solvent in vacuo, the sample was dissolved in 1 ml
of hexane. After filtering thorough a 0.22-lm nylon syringe filter, an
aliquot (50 ll) was injected into HPLC.
Apparatus and Chromatographic Conditions
Chromatography in this experiment was performed using an Agilent
1100 series HPLC (Agilent Technology) equipped with a G1322A degas-
ser, G1311A pump, G1316A column compartment, G1329B automatic
injector, a 50-ll sample loop, and G1315B diode array detector (DAD).
The signal was received and processed by an Agilent Chemstation. The
enantiomers of tetraconazole were separated by HPLC with Chiralcel1
OJ-H (cellulose tris-(4-methylbenzoate)) chiral column (250 3 4.6 mm2,
5 lm, Daicel Company, Japan). Void times were determined using 1,3,5-
tri-tertbutyl benzene. Capacity factor (k), separation factor (a), and reso-
lutions (Rs) were calculated from the formula k 5 (t2t0)/t0, a 5 k2/k1,
Pharmacokinetic and Calculation
It was assumed that the degradation of the enantiomers in plants and
soil accorded with first-order kinetics. Corresponding rate constants k
was calculated according to Eq. 1. The starting point was the maximum
value of the concentration, and decreased in following days. The half-life
(T1/2, day) was estimated from Eq. 2.
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir