T.M. Kijek et al.
Analytical Biochemistry 622 (2021) 114116
at the active site. The metal chelator EDTA increased the activity
twofold. Inhibition by divalent metal salts and activation by the metal
chelator EDTA strongly suggest that our API preparation contained
metal ions. In fact, the enzyme was purified from Ni-NTA affinity col-
umn [7]. The protein might have picked up nickel from the column
during the purification step, and our results described here show that
concentration, reaction time, and enzyme concentration, are the foun-
dations of a dependable enzyme assay [24]. We have demonstrated that
the ellipticity of the API substrate (or product) Ru5P linearly decreases
with its increasing concentration (Fig. 2B), ellipticity of the API sub-
strate Ru5P increases linearly in the presence of API with the passage of
time (Fig. 3B and D), and the initial rates of the API enzyme reaction are
linear with the API concentration (Fig. 3D). Thus, the CD based assay of
API fulfills the three essential criteria of a dependable enzyme assay.
Enzyme assays often require component reagents in addition to the
substrate(s) and enzyme. We have tested several such reagents including
DTT, EDTA, detergents, and metal salts to determine if these compounds
might have any adverse effect on the CD property of the substrate(s) or
on the enzyme itself. None of these reagents had any adverse effect on
the CD of the substrate Ru5P (Fig. 4). Some Metals, such as zinc and
nickel, had strong inhibitory effect on the API activity. A similar effect
was also observed with the enzyme from E. coli [7]. The inhibitory effect
of zinc can be utilized as an internal control in screening compound
databases as inhibitor or drug candidates. Small organic molecules are
often insoluble in aqueous solvents and require DMSO to solubilize. In
most cases, DMSO is inhibitory to enzyme activity. Our demonstration in
Fig. 5 that low concentrations of DMSO had no effect on Ru5P CD and
API enzyme activity makes this spectropolarimetric assay an ideal tool
to screen for small molecule inhibitors.
4
NiSO strongly inhibited the API. Therefore, all further enzyme activity
reaction mixtures included 1 mM EDTA. The divalent iron of ferrous
sulfate on the other hand stimulated the activity remarkably. A struc-
tural role of iron in API would be an important aspect of further
investigation.
3
.3. Low concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide has no effect on CD of
Ru5P and on API activity
API is an attractive target for therapeutic development against
tuleramia and other gram-negative infections [2]. Since drug-like
organic enzyme inhibitors are often insoluble in aqueous solvents,
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is frequently used to solubilize those [24].
Thus in many enzyme reactions, low concentrations of DMSO inadver-
tently get introduced that may adversely affect the enzyme activity.
Determination of the threshold of DMSO concentration is a prerequisite
for small molecule inhibitor screening [24]. We therefore looked at the
effects of increasing concentrations of DMSO on API activity (Fig. 5).
DMSO at 5% or lower concentration had an insignificant effect on the
enzyme activity. Above 5%, the solvent progressively inhibited the
enzyme activity. At 10% DMSO, the enzyme retained more than 80%
activity. Therefore we used 5–10% DMSO in the assay mixture as a
control (with no inhibitor) to keep the inhibitors in solution.
We have also probed the dependability of the CD method by
comparing results of our assay with those of the literature determined by
a more cumbersome yet conventional method of cysteine-carbazole
method [7,8]. Although the latter method is eightfold more sensitive
in detecting the substrate Ru5P than our CD method (Fig. 2B), we were
able to use 0.4–1 mM substrate consistently (an example is shown in
Fig. 3D), a concentration close to 0.5 mM used in the cysteine-carbazole
method [7]. The 1 mM concentration of the substrate used is also above
4
. Discussions
the K
Ar5P (0.57 mM) and Ru5P (0.3 mM) [20]. Validity of our CD method is
further demonstrated by the similarity of Ru5P K
m
as reported for F. tularensis Ar5P (0.3 mM) [7], and for E. coli
Rotation of polarized light is a unique property of molecules con-
taining one or more asymmetric carbon atoms. Rotation of plane
polarized light by such molecules has been routinely used for some
racemase enzyme assays [10–16]. On the other hand, extensive appli-
cation of circularly polarized light, such as CD, is used in protein sec-
ondary structure determination [17]. CD of a molecule is the difference
in the absorbance of left circularly polarized light and right circularly
polarized light. In a limited extent, it has also been used for poly-
saccharide secondary structure determination [25]. However, compared
to UV–Vis absorption spectrophotometry, the utility of CD for routine
enzyme activity assays has remained largely unexplored. Only a handful
of examples are available. CD-based assays of ornithine decarboxylase
m
of 0.7 ± 0.1 mM
determined by CD with the above mentioned reported values in litera-
ture that were determined by the cysteine-carbazole method. We
determined this value by measuring the reaction rates of 0.4–2 mM
Ru5P with a fixed 20 nM API concentration. Most importantly, the CD
method described here eliminates the use of highly corrosive 25 N sul-
furic acid in the cysteine carbazole method.
The CD method described here is thus fully compatible with the
conventional cysteine-carbazole method. In addition, unlike the latter,
our method is direct, avoids the toxic sulfuric acid, and at least 90 times
faster. Therefore the CD method should be a routine method of choice
for API enzyme assay in screening for inhibitors from large compound
libraries.
[
26], mandelate racemase [14], triose phosphate isomerase [27], and
amino acid racemase [28] have been used in addition to other more
conventional methods. These CD based assays are direct, without the
need for additional coupling enzyme or chemical reaction, and can
easily be adapted to initial velocity measurements. The basic principle of
this assay is that either the reactant or the principal product, but not
both, of the enzymatic reaction has a CD ellipticity at a particular
wavelength. Progress of the enzyme reaction is accompanied by an in-
crease or decrease of the CD ellipticity. Because no other reactant(s) is
necessary, the technique is a direct measure of the enzyme activity and
should be a preferred method.
Although the API assay can be accomplished in 1 min, the method
described here manually handles one assay at a time. However, CD
spectroplolarimeter manufactures have come up with capabilities to
handle 96 samples at a time. For example, both Jasco and Bio-Logics and
Hinds Instruments market CD machines that has an accessory to screen
96-well plates in 2 min. Adaptation of such instruments in the API ac-
tivity assay would accelerate the discovery of small drug-like molecules
against targeting API for the discovery of new antibiotics for gram
negative bacterial infections.
The reaction of API described here uses one substrate Ru5 and pro-
duces one product Ar5P. Because the reaction does not require an
extraneous energy source, such as ATP, the reaction is also reversible. In
other words the product can also serve as a substrate. In this paper, we
have shown that Ru5P has a strong negative ellipticity at 279 nm of
In conclusion, the API enzymatic assay described here is a direct,
rapid, and ‘real time’ assay that is free from health and environmental
hazard, and should be in routine use for screening of compound libraries
for drug discovery against Francisella tularensis.
In conclusion, the API enzymatic assay described here is a direct,
rapid, and ‘real time’ assay that is free of sulfuric acid use and should be
in routine use for screening of compound libraries for targets allowing
CD measurements.
ꢀ 1 ꢀ 1
3
0,560 M cm , while Ar5P has no ellipticity (Fig. 1A). The lack of
ellipticity of the latter is due to the fact that it does not have any
noticeable absorbance at 279–280 nm. The difference in CD properties
of these two compounds formed the basis of development of our API
assay.
Linearity of a measurement parameter with substrate (or product)
5