Expeditious Assembly of 2-Amino-4H-chromene Skeleton
COMMUNICATION
discovery of a novel and active chiral catalyst that could
promote this reaction with both high efficiency and excel-
lent stereocontrol became our main focus. In this context,
we sought to extent the usage of the indane-amine–thiourea
catalytic system based on several successful examples dis-
closed by our research group.[13] Undoubtedly, bifunctional
indane-amine–thiourea organocatalysts demonstrated some
unique aspects, such as higher activity, excellent stereocon-
(Table 2, entries, 4, 5, 7, and 8). Use of solid Na2CO3 (no
water) decreased the reaction rate and ee value (Table 2,
entry 2, 720 min, 52% ee). A slightly weaker base Li2CO3
improved the reaction conversion and maintained the ee
value (Table 2, entry 3, 88% yield, 77% ee). A slow conver-
sion was observed when NaHCO3 was used (Table 2,
entry 9). This evidence prompted us to select aqueous
Li2CO3 as the base media of choice and the further optimi-
zation of the standard reaction parameters was carried out.
For further optimization, solvent, as well as reaction tem-
perature, were examined (Table 3). The initial solvent
trol, and
a flexible skeleton. Catalyst I, II, and IV
(Scheme 2) exhibited high stereoselectivity in several Mi-
chael addition reaction-triggered cascade processes. Un-
fortunately, catalyst I gave a poor result in this catalytic pro-
cess (Table 1, 38% yield, 29% ee). Catalyst III, a similar an-
alogue of catalyst I but with a switch of amine and thiourea
functional groups, showed good enantioselectivity (Table 1,
50% yield, 77% ee). While the further improvements were
ongoing, we noticed that the dihedral angle between the two
functional groups on the catalyst was a critical factor in con-
trolling the stereochemistry. Consequently, catalysts II and
IV (Scheme 2) were synthesized with the amine and thiour-
ea group anti to each other. In contrast to the structure of
catalysts I and III, catalysts II and IV just have a chiral in-
version on the amine part, respectively, but maintain all the
other features. Results showed that catalysts II and IV were
not the best catalysts (Table 1, entries 2 and 4, 9 and
30% ee, respectively). Meanwhile, we examined catalyst V,
a l-tert-leucine derivative; however, only a moderate result
was generated (Table 1, entry 5, 61% yield, 44% ee).
Having failed to find a catalyst more promising than III, a
base screen was then performed.
Table 3. Evaluation of other parameters.[a]
Entry
Solvent
T
c
A
t
Yield
[%][c]
ee
[b]
[oC]
[molLÀ1
]
[min]
[%][d]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CH2Cl2
C2H2Cl2
Toluene
PhCF3
Anisole
iPrOH
DMSO
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
0
0
0
0
À10
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10
10
60
60
60
60
60
10
10
30
120
180
88
78
72
80
67
67
77
89
90
94
94
92
77
71
76
72
78
27
3
79
83
88
83
83
9
0.1
10
11
12
0.05
0.025
0.05
Optimization studies highlighted the ability of a range of
bases, either solid or an aqueous solution (Table 2), to gen-
erate the N-Boc imine in situ. Stronger aqueous bases
K2CO3, Cs2CO3, LiOH, or KOH, did increase the conversion
to the desired product, but did not increase the ee value
[a] Reaction conditions: tert-butyl (2-hydroxyphenyl)(phenylsulfonyl)
methylcarbamate (1a, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), malononitrile 2 (0.11 mmol,
1.1 equiv), Li2CO3 (0.1m, 0.12 mmol, 1.2 equiv), and catalyst III
(10 mol%). [b] Concentration. [c] Yield of isolated product after column
chromatography. [d] Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC.
Table 2. Base effect.[a]
screen was performed at room temperature. In general, less
polar solvents are crucial for obtaining good enantioselectiv-
ities at room temperature (Table 3, entries 1–5, 71–78% ee).
For high polar solvents, relatively lower enantioselectivities
were obtained due to the potential removal of the hydro-
gen-bonding interaction between the substrates and the cat-
alyst (Table 3, entries 6 and 7, 20 and 45% ee, respectively).
Finally, CH2Cl2 gave the best results with respect to reaction
rate, yield and ee value (Table 3, entry 1). To further opti-
mize the reaction, we varied the reaction temperature and
the concentration of Li2CO3. The results showed that the
enantioselectivity can be enhanced by an appropriate tem-
perature and base concentration (Table 3, entry 10, 30 min,
94% yield, 88% ee).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, the generality of
our cascade process was examined by using various in situ
generated aromatic N-carbamoyl a-imino ethyl glyoxylates
1a–i (Scheme 3). Aromatic N-carbamoyl a-imino ethyl
glyoxylates having both electron-withdrawing (Scheme 3,
3b–d, 82–87% yield, 83–85% ee) and electron-donating sub-
Entry[a]
Base
t
Yield
[%][b]
ee
A
[%][c]
1
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Li2CO3
K2CO3
10
720
10
10
10
30
2
50
74
88
70
77
86
71
82
85
77
52
77
76
74
74
73
71
68
2[d]
3
4
5
Cs2CO3
6
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(NH4)2CO3
7
LiOH
8
9
NaOH
NaHCO3
2
180
[a] Reaction conditions: tert-butyl (2-hydroxyphenyl)(phenylsulfonyl)
methylcarbamate (1a, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), malononitrile 2 (0.11 mmol,
1.1 equiv), base (0.1m, 0.12 mmol, 1.2 equiv), and catalyst III (10 mol%)
in CH2Cl2 (0.2 mL) at RT. [b] Yield of isolated product after column
chromatography. [c] Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC.
[d] 0.12 mmol of dry Na2CO3 was used.
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7781 – 7785
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
7783