Reducing Agent-Structure-Activity Relationship of PdAg/C Catalysts in Formic Acid Decomposition
Huang et al.
Hubei Key Laboratory for Processing and Application of
Catalytic Materials (CH201410).
References and Notes
1
2
3
4
5
. D. A. Bulushev, S. Beloshapkin, and J. R. H. Ross, Catal. Today
154, 7 (2010).
. X. C. Zhou, Y. J. Huang, W. Xing, C. P. Liu, J. H. Liao, and T. H.
Lu, Chem. Commun. 30, 3540 (2008).
. K. Jiang, K. Xu, S. Z. Zou, and W. B. Cai, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
36, 4861 (2014).
. G. Q. Lu, A. Crown, and A. Wieckowski, J. Phys. Chem. B
03, 9700 (1999).
1
. L. Jia, D. A. Bulushev, O. Y. Podyacheva, A. I. Boronin, L. S. Kibis,
E. Y. Gerasimov, S. Beloshapkin, I. A. Seryak, Z. R. Ismagilov, and
J. R. H. Ross, J. Catal. 307, 94 (2013).
6. M. Ojeda and E. Iglesia, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition
48, 4800 (2009).
7
. Q.-Y. Bi, X.-L. Du, Y.-M. Liu, Y. Cao, H.-Y. He, and K.-N. Fan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8926 (2012).
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra for CO detection: (a) 100 ppm CO, (b) 75 ppm
CO, (c) 50 ppm CO, (d) 30 ppm CO and (e) the reforming gas from the
ꢀ
8. S. Singh, S. Li, R. Carrasquillo-Flores, A. C. Alba-Rubio, J. A.
Dumesic, and M. Mavrikakis, Aiche J. 60, 1303 (2014).
FA decomposition on PdAg/C–FA catalyst at 25 C.
9
. Y. Huang, X. Zhou, M. Yin, C. Liu, and W. Xing, Chem. Mater.
22, 5122 (2010).
stability of the PdAg/C catalyst during the FA decom-
position. The CO content of the reforming gas from FA
decomposition on the PdAg/C–FA catalyst was examined
by FT-IR. As shown in Figure 6, there was no obser-
vation of characteristic adsorption peaks of CO between
10. K. Tedsree, T. Li, S. Jones, C. W. A. Chan, K. M. K. Yu, P. A. J.
Bagot, E. A. Marquis, G. D. W. Smith, and S. C. E. Tsang, Nat.
Nanotechnol. 6, 302 (2011).
11. S. Zhang, O. Metin, D. Su, and S. H. Sun, Angewandte Chemie-
International Edition 52, 3681 (2013).
−1
2
040 and 2200 cm . This result indicated high selectivity
12. J. Cho, S. Lee, J. Han, S. P. Yoon, S. W. Nam, S. H. Choi, S.-A.
Hong, K.-Y. Lee, and H. C. Ham, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 15, 8233
of decomposition pathway and high quality of reforming
gases, which was always a favor in fuel cell applications.
(2015).
1
3. S. Duan, Y. F. Ji, P. P. Fang, Y. X. Chen, X. Xu, Y. Luo, and Z. Q.
IP: 79.110.19.91 On: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:23:32
Tian, PCCP 15, 4625 (2013).
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
1
4. Z. L. Wang, J. M. Yan, Y. Ping, H. L. Wang, W. T. Zheng,
4
. CONCLUSIONS
Delivered by Ingenta
and Q. Jiang, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 52, 4406
2013).
15. J. Liu, L. Lan, R. Li, X. Liu, and C. Wu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
1, 951 (2016).
The structure-activity relationship of PdAg/C catalysts was
studied by tuning the reducing agents during the prepa-
ration. It was found that the reducing agents influenced
the degree of alloying, particle size, atoms distribution and
electronic state of the PdAg surface. For example, all the
reducing agents except SB promoted the formation of Pd
in the PdAg surface. The particle sizes of PdAg nanoparti-
cles from the gas-reduction method were larger than those
from the wet-reduction method. The weak reducing agent
of AA produced electron-rich Ag atoms and electron-
poor Pd atoms. The combination of PdAg nanoparticle
structure with activity results indicated that the abundant
and electron-rich Pd atoms in the PdAg bimetal surface
benefited the catalytic activity, which could be possibly
designed by selecting a suitable reducing agent. The best
PdAg/C catalyst was prepared from FA and showed high
activity, selectivity and durability for hydrogen genera-
tion from FA decomposition without any additive at room
temperature.
(
4
1
6. Y. Jiang, X. Fan, X. Xiao, T. Qin, L. Zhang, F. Jiang, M. Li, S. Li,
H. Ge, and L. Chen, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4, 657 (2016).
7. J. Cho, S. Lee, J. Han, S. P. Yoon, S. W. Nam, S. H. Choi, K. Y.
Lee, and H. C. Ham, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 22553
(2014).
1
18. L. Yang, X. Hua, J. Su, W. Luo, S. Chen, and G. Cheng, Applied
Catalysis B-Environmental 168, 423 (2015).
19. K. Mandal, D. Bhattacharjee, and S. Dasgupta, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 40, 4786 (2015).
20. N. R. Mathe, S. S. Nkosi, D. E. Motaung, M. R. Scriba, and N. J.
Coville, Electrocatalysis 6, 274 (2015).
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1. L. Zhang, K. C. Lee, and J. J. Zhang, Electrochim. Acta 52, 7964
(2007).
2. Y. C. Wei, C. W. Liu, Y. W. Chang, C. M. Lai, P. Y. Lim, L. D.
Tsai, and K. W. Wang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 1864 (2010).
3. B. J. Hwang, S. M. S. Kumar, C. H. Chen, R. W. Chang, D. G. Liu,
and J. F. Lee, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112, 2370 (2008).
4. H. B. Bae, S. H. Oh, J. C. Woo, and S. H. Choi, J. Nanosci. Nan-
otechnol. 10, 6901 (2010).
5. Y. Holade, C. Canaff, S. Poulin, T. W. Napporn, K. Servat, and K. B.
Kokoh, Rsc Advances 6, 12627 (2016).
6. Y. Y. Cai, X. H. Li, Y. N. Zhang, X. Wei, K. X. Wang, and J. S.
Chen, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 52, 11822 (2013).
7. J. Cheng, X. Gu, X. Sheng, P. Liu, and H. Su, Journal of Materials
Chemistry A 4, 1887 (2016).
Acknowledgments: National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (21303172), the Fundamental Research
Funds for the Central Universities, China University of
Geosciences (Wuhan) (CUG140610 and CUG140414) and
28. O. Metin, X. L. Sun, and S. H. Sun, Nanoscale 5, 910 (2013).
Received: 31 May 2016. Accepted: 6 September 2016.
3802
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 17, 3798–3802, 2017