Please d oC hn eo mt Ca do mj u ms t margins
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
complete disappearance of peaks at 627.2 and 955.8 cm after
Journal Name
-1
Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 433, 329-335.
3
(a) O. A. Habeeb, R. Kanthasamy, G. A. M. Ali, S. Sethupathi and
DOI: 10.1039/D0CC05894G
3
SO
h. No characteristic peaks of other sulfur related species like
R. B. M. Yunus, Rev. Chem. Eng., 2018, 34, 837-854; (b) M. Sassi
and A. K. Gupta, Am. J. Environ. Sci., 2008, 4, 502-511; (c) A.
Vrachnos, G. Kontogeorgis and E. Voutsas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2006, 45, 5148-5154.
2
-
-1
2-
-1
4
(606.6, 1114.9 cm ), S
O
2 8
(1062.8, 1289.2 cm ) were
2
-
detected in the real reaction system, demonstrating that SO
3
2
-
2 3
could efficiently convert into S O . Similar result was also
4
5
S. V. Tambwekar and M. Subrahmanyam, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy, 1997, 22, 959-965.
(a) K. Maeda, K. Teramura, D. Lu, T. Takata, N. Saito, Y. Inoue
and K. Domen, Nature, 2006, 440, 295. (b) U. V. Kawade, R. P.
Panmand, Y. A. Sethi, M. V. Kulkarni, S. K. Apte, S. D. Naik and B.
B. Kale, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 49295-49302.
(a) Z. H. Xie, S. Yu, X.-B. Fan, S. Q. Wei, L. Yu, Y. Zhong, X.-W.
Gao, F. Wu and Y. Zhou, J. Energy Chem., 2021, 52, 234-242; (b)
S. Yu, Z. H. Xie, M. X. Ran, F. Wu, Y. Q. Zhong, M. Dan and Y.
Zhou, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 573, 71-77; (c) X. Zong, J. F.
Han, B. Seger, H. J. Chen, G. M. Lu, C. Li and L. Z. Wang, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4399-4403.
obtained by other photocatalysts including CdS NCs,
commercial CdS and Pt-loaded commercial CdS (Figure S10).
Iodometry analysis indicates that a total amount of 67.0 ± 0.4
-1
2-
mg mL S
which is close the theoretical value (67.2 mg mL ). XRD test
Figure S11) confirms that only Na could be discerned
from the reaction solution. This result indicates that it is
possible to collect Na as an important sulfur chemical in
the reaction system of Na SO solution during photocatalytic
splitting of H S for H evolution, which is often ignored by
2 3
O existed in the system after 3h of photocatalysis,
-1
9
6
(
2 2 3
S O
2 2 3
S O
2
3
2
2
7
8
Y. Li, S. Yu, D. E. Doronkin, S. Q. Wei, M. Dan, F. Wu, L. Q. Ye, J.-
D. Grunwaldt and Y. Zhou, J. Catal., 2019, 373, 48-57.
(a) B. B. Kale, J. O. Baeg, S. M. Lee, H. Chang, S. J. Moon and C.
W. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2006, 16, 1349-1354; (b) B. B. Kale,
J.-O. Baeg, K.-J. Kong, S.-J. Moon, L. K. Nikam and K. R. Patil, J.
Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2624-2631; (c) S. A. Naman and M.
Grätzel, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 1994, 77, 249-253.
M. Dan, Q. Zhang, S. Yu, A. Prakash, Y. H. Lin and Y. Zhou, Appl.
Catal. B: Environ., 2017, 217, 530-539.
0 (a) A. Prakash, M. Dan, S. Yu, S. Q. Wei, Y. Li, F. Wang and Y.
Zhou, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2018, 180, 205-212; (b) Q.
Wang and K. Domen, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 919-985.
1 (a) K. Hara, K. Sayama and H. Arakawa, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.,
previous work. Nevertheless, it should be noted that a small
amount of polysulfide could be detected from the system in
2
-
3
UV-Vis spectra due to the lack of SO , which was all
1
9
consumed within 3 h (Figure S12).
In summary, photocatalytic splitting of H
2 2 3
S in Na SO
solution was carefully investigated with Ca-CdS NCs as the
photocatalyst. An excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution
9
1
-1
-1
rate of 56.0 mmol g
amount of Ca in the NCs. Na
better choice for H evolution over Ca-CdS NCs compared to
h
could be achieved with an optimal
2
SO solution was proved to be a
3
2
1
1
other previously reported reaction media by direct
photocatalytic tests and LSV tests. Moreover, FT-IR spectra
1
999, 189, 127-137; (b) N. Bühler, K. Meier and J.-F. Reber, J.
Phys. Chem. B, 1984, 88, 3261-3268.
indicated that Na
This work simultaneously collects clean energy H
chemicals (Na ) from H
presence of Na , which achieves the highly value-added
utilization of toxic H S.
2
SO
3
could convert into Na
S O
2 2 3
effectively.
2 (a) A. H. Hall, R. Dart and G. Bogdan, Ann. Emerg. Med., 2007,
4
2
and sulfur
9, 806-813; (b) B. R. Sperber, J. Allee, R. Elenitsas and W. D.
S O
2 2 3
2
S by photocatalysis in the
James, Contact Dermatitis, 2003, 48, 204-208; (c) L. Strazzula, S.
U. Nigwekar, D. Steele, W. Tsiaras, M. Sise, S. Bis, G. P. Smith
and D. Kroshinsky, JAMA Dermatol., 2013, 149, 946-949.
SO
2 3
2
1
3 X.-B. Fan, S. Yu, H.-L. Wu, Z.-J. Li, Y.-J. Gao, X.-B. Li, L.-P. Zhang,
C.-H. Tung and L.-Z. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 16328-
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (U1862111 and 22002123), Cheung Kong
1
6332.
Scholars Programme of China and Chinese Academic of 14 (a) J. J. Ding, S. Sun, W. H. Yan, J. Bao and C. Gao, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 13153-13158; (b) M. Dan, J. L.
Xiang, F. Wu, S. Yu, Q. Cai, L.Q. Ye, Y.H. Ye, Y. Zhou, Appl. Catal.
B: Environ., 2019, 256, 117870; (c) Z. J. Sun, H. F. Zheng, J. S. Li
and P. W. Du, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 2668-2676.
Science “light of west China” Program, Provincial International
Cooperation Project 2020YFH0118, Sichuan, China), Open
Fund (PLN201802 and 201928) of State Key Laboratory of Oil
and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest
Petroleum University), Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of
Industrial Vent Gas Reuse (SKLIVGR-SWPU-2020-05).
1
1
5 A. Nag, D. S. Chung, D. S. Dolzhnikov, N. M. Dimitrijevic, S.
Chattopadhyay, T. Shibata and D. V. Talapin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2
012, 134, 13604-13615.
6 (a) Y. Xu and M. A. A. Schoonen, Am. Mineral, 2000, 85, 543-
56; (b) X. Q. Hao, J. Zhou, Z. W. Cui, Y. C. Wang, Y. Wang and Z.
5
G. Zou, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2018, 229, 41-51; (c) Y. B. Chen,
J.-F. Li, P.-Y. Liao, Y.-S. Zeng, Z. Wang and Z.-Q. Liu, Chinese
Chem. Lett., 2020, 31, 1516-1519.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
1
1
7 (a) J. L. Xiang, M. Dan, Q. Cai, S. Yu and Y. Zhou, Appl. Surf. Sci.,
2
019, 494, 700-707; (b) M. Dan, S. Yu, Y. Li, S. Q. Wei, J. L. Xiang
and Y. Zhou, J. Photoch. Photobio. C, 2020, 42, 100339.
Notes and references
8 (a) J. Yota, V. A. Burrows, J. Vac. Sci Technol. A, 1993, 11, 1083-
1
088; (b) I. V. Pekov, N. V. Chukanov, S. N. Britvin, Y. K. Kabalov,
1
(a) M. Dan, S. Q. Wei, D. E. Doronkin, Y. Li, Z. Y. Zhao, S. Yu, J.-D.
J. Göttlicher, V. O. Yapaskurt, A. E. Zadov, S. V. Krivovichev, W.
Schüller and B. Ternes, Mineral. Mag., 2012, 76, 1133-1152; (c)
S.-M. Chen, S.-W. Chiu, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 4399-4408.
9 M. Zhang, J. Guan, Y. C. Tu, S. M. Chen, Y. Wang, S. H. Wang, L.
Yu, C. Ma, D. H. Deng and X. H. Bao, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020,
Grunwaldt, Y. H. Lin and Y. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2019,
2
43, 790-800; (b) X. Zhang, Y. Y. Tang, S. Q. Qu, J. W. Da and Z.
P. Hao, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 1053-1067. (c) C. L. Geng, J. Gu, Y.
Xu and D. Weng, Mater. Rev., 2011, 25, 119-122.
1
2
(a) M. S. Shah, M. Tsapatsis and J. I. Siepmann, Chem. Rev.,
1
3, 119-126.
2
017, 117, 9755-9803; (b) A. P. Reverberi, J. J. Klemeš, P. S.
Varbanov and B. Fabiano, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 136, 72-80; (c)
G. J. Ma, H. Y. Yan, J. Y. Shi, X. Zong, Z. B. Lei and C. Li, J. Catal.,
2
008, 260, 134-140; (d) G. Liu, J. Ji, P. Hu, S. Lin and H. Huang,
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins