408
VLADIMIROVA
1
Table 6. Rates of reactions (1), (2), and (5) (Vi, pmol s )
nificantly lower than that in the system H O(outer S.),
the role of reaction (5) will be significant at a short
2
3
at [H2O] = 2.5%, [O2] = 2.3 10
mol, and D =
1
2 Gy s 1 g . System PuO2 H2O(outer S.)
storage time of PuO samples also.
2
For a certain period of time depending on the radia-
Time, days
V1
46
40
34
V2
V5
tion dose rate and O content in the ampule, the ex-
2
pression for the rate of H formation has the form
2
7
50
5.4
4.7
4.0
2.9
1.2
0.64
0.45
0.07
0.47
0.9
1.7
2.7
d[H2]/dt = K1[H2O]
K5[H2][O2].
(VII)
100
200
500
800
1000
25
Thus, we developed a model allowing calculation
of the H and O amounts and the pressure in the
10.7
5.5
3.9
2.5
2.25
2
2
vessel for storage of PuO depending on the amount
2
of sorbed water, radiation dose rate, and storage time.
REFERENCES
In this relationship, [H ] and [O ] are expressed
2 st
2 st
3
2
in cm per gram PuO and [H O] , in %; 8 10 is
2
2
0
3
the scaling factor from cm to moles and from moles
1. Caldwell, C. and Menis, O., USAES Report, NUMEC
P-90, 1962, p. 13.
to per cents of H O.
2
Using expression (VI), it is possible to find the
2. Vladimirova, M.V., Radiatsionnaya khimiya aktinoi-
dov (Radiation Chemistry of Actinides), Moscow:
Energoatomizdat, 1983.
3
maximum amount of H and O in 1 cm under given
2
2
conditions and, by so doing, the maximum pressure of
gases. It should be emphasized that the maximum
amounts of H and O do not depend on the Pu form,
3. Haschke, J., Allen, T., and Stakebake, J., J. Alloys
Comp., 1996, vol. 243, p. 23.
2
2
i.e., on the radiation dose rate. The latter will affect
only the period of establishment of steady states, i.e.,
the period in which expressions (V) and (VI) are
valid.
4. Haschke, J. and Allen, T., Report of Los Alamos
National Laboratory, LA-13537-MS, 1999.
5. Morales, L., Allen, T., and Haschke, J., Proc. Int.
Conf. Plutonium Futures The Science, Pilay, K.K.S.
and Kim, K.C., Eds., Am. Inst. of Physics, 2000,
p. 114.
The calculations showed that, at the H O content
2
equal to 3%, the steady-state maximal amount of
3
superstoichiometric Pu oxide is 1.3 10 mol or
6. Haschke, J., Allen, T., and Morales, L., Science, 2000,
0.35 g per gram of PuO , which is 35% of the initial
vol. 287, p. 285.
2
amount of PuO . This amount is sufficiently large to
7. Haschke, J., Allen, T., and Morales, L., J. Alloys
Comp., 2001, vol. 314, p. 78.
2
be determined experimentally, provided that H O
actually decomposes to form water by reaction (4).
2
2
8. Report of Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-
13781-MS, 2000, p. 32.
9. Vladimirova, M.V. and Kulikov, I.A., Radiokhimiya,
Calculation of the Rates of Individual Reactions
2002, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 83.
We calculated the rates of reactions (1) and (2) of
H and O formation and reaction (5) of their recom-
10. Duffey, J. and Livingstone, R., Abstracts of Papers,
5th Topical Meet. on Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile
Materials Management, Charlestone (the United
States), 2002.
2
2
bination in an air-containing ampule (initial content
3
of O 2.3 10
mol). The results are presented
2
in Table 6, from which it is seen that at a time of
200 days the rate of reaction (5) is significantly
11. Paffett, M and Kelly, D., Abstracts of Papers, 5th
Topical Meet. on Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile
Materials Management, Charlestone (the United
States), 2002.
lower than the rate of H formation, and at a time
2
longer than 500 days V approaches V . This is ex-
5
1
12. Vladimirova, M.V., Radiokhimiya, 2002, vo. 44,
plained by a decrease in the rate of reaction (1) due to
decreasing amount of sorbed water. Thus, our calcula-
tions showed that, in air-containing ampules, the
contribution of recombination of H and O to
no. 5, p. 455.
13. Vladimirova, M.V., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., Suppl. 3,
2002, November, p. 379.
2
2
the apparent rate of H formation at a dose rate of
14. Vladimirova, M.V., Abstracts of Papers, 5th Topical
Meet. on Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Materials
Management, Charlestone (the United States), 2002.
2
1
2 Gy s increases in time. Presumably, for the system
H O(total S.) in which the rate of H formation is sig-
2
2
RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 48 No. 4 2006