1008
KHARISOV et al.
CH), 9.77 d (1H, CHO, J = 0.005 Hz). 13C NMR
spectrum, C, ppm: 18.23 (C2 ), 19.79 (3-CH3), 24.64
(C3), 34.92 (2 -CH3), 41.42 (C2), 49.60 (C4), 168.17
(C1), 172.30 (C1 ), 200.77 (CHO).
(to pH 7), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to
obtain 5.44 g (87%) of acetal VI.
Run no. 8. An analogous experiment was carried
out in cyclohexane.
Run no. 4. An ozone oxygen mixture (0.85 equiv
of O3) was passed at 65 C through a solution of
1.00 g (6.58 mmol) of enone II in 10 ml of CH2Cl2
containing 0.54 ml (0.43 g, 13.4 mmol) of methanol.
The mixture was treated according to procedure b:
it was purged with argon and was left to stand for
48 h at room temperature. A solution of 0.05 g of
p-toluenesulfonic acid in 20 ml of methanol was
added, the mixture was stirred for 48 h, 0.50 g of
NaHCO3 was added, and the mixture was evaporated
under reduced pressure. The residue was treated with
50 ml of Et2O, and the extract was washed with
a saturated solution of NaCl (to pH 7), dried over
Na2SO4, and evaporated. The residue was 1.05 g of
an oily substance which contained mainly compounds
II, VI, and VIII at a ratio of 1:3:2 (GLC).
Run no. 5. An ozone oxygen mixture (1 equiv of
O3) was passed at 65 C through a solution of 1.00 g
(6.58 mmol) of enone II in 10 ml of CH2Cl2 contain-
ing 0.54 ml (0.43 g, 13.4 mmol) of methanol. The
mixture was treated according to procedure c: it was
purged with argon, a solution of 0.05 g of p-toluene-
sulfonic acid in 20 ml of methanol was added, the
mixture was stirred for 48 h, 0.50 g of NaHCO3 was
added, and the mixture was evaporated under reduced
pressure. The residue was treated with 50 ml of
Et2O, and the extract was washed with a saturated
solution of NaCl (to pH 7), dried over Na2SO4, and
evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was
1.15 g of an oily substance, the major component of
which was acetal VI (GLC).
Run no. 9. An ozone oxygen mixture (0.85 1 equiv
of O3) was passed at 5 C through a solution of 1.00 g
(6.58 mmol) of enone II in 10 ml of methanol. The
mixture was then treated according to procedure c
to isolate 1.20 g of an oily substance. According to
the GLC data, the major components of the product
were compounds II, VI, and VIII at a ratio of 2:2:1.
Methyl (R)-5,5-dimethoxy-3-methylpentanoate
(VI). [ ]2D5 = 1.54 (c = 4.76, CHCl3) (cf. [10]). The
1
IR and H NMR parameters were almost identical to
those reported in [10]. 13C NMR spectrum, C, ppm:
19.48 q (3-CH3); 26.14 d (C3); 38.38 t (C4); 40.78 t
(C2); 50.56 q, 51.42 q, and 52.00 q (OCH3); 102.30 d
(C5), 172.35 s (C1).
Dimethyl 3-methylglutarate (VIII). The IR and
1H NMR spectral parameters were almost identical
to those reported in [11].
REFERENCES
1. Kharisov, R.Ya., Botsman, O.V., Gazetdinov, R.R.,
Ishmuratov, G.Yu., and Tolstikov, G.A., Izv. Ross.
Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2001, no. 6, p. 1067.
2. Ishmuratov, G.Yu., Yakovleva, M.P., Khari-
sov, R.Ya., and Tolstikov, G.A., Monoterpenoidy
v sinteze opticheski aktivnykh feromonov nasekomykh
(Monoterpenoids in the Synthesis of Optically Active
Insect Pheromones), Ufa: Gilem, 1999.
3. Weiping, C. and Jianliang, X., Tetrahedron Lett.,
2001, vol. 42, pp. 2897 2899.
4. Treibs, W. and Albrecht, H., J. Prakt. Chem., 1961,
vol. 13, nos. 5 6, pp. 291 305.
5. Fliszar, S. and Granger, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1969, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 3330 3337.
6. Odinokov, V.N. and Tolstikov, G.A., Usp. Khim.,
Run no. 6. An ozone oxygen mixture (1 equiv of
O3) was passed at 20 C through a solution of 1.00 g
(6.58 mmol) of enone II in 7 ml of CCl4 containing
0.54 ml (0.43 g, 13.4 mmol) of methanol. The mixture
was then treated according to procedure c to obtain
1.06 g (85%) of acetal VI.
1981, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1207 1251.
7. Chorvat, R.J. and Pappo, R., J. Org. Chem., 1976,
Run no. 7. An ozone oxygen mixture (1 equiv of
O3) was bubbled at 5 C through a solution of 5.00 g
(32.9 mmol) of enone II in 35 ml of CCl4 containing
2.82 ml (65.9 mmol) of methanol. The mixture was
purged with argon, a solution of 0.25 g of p-toluene-
sulfonic acid in 50 ml of methanol was added, and
the mixture was left to stand for 2 days at room
temperature (until peroxide compounds disappeared
according to iodine starch test). Sodium hydrogen
carbonate, 2.50 g, was added, and the mixture was
evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was
treated with 100 ml of Et2O, and the extract was
washed with a saturated solution of sodium chloride
vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 2864 2865.
8. US Patent no. 3109016, 1963; Chem. Abstr., 1964,
vol. 60, p. 3045f.
9. Galin, F.Z., Kukovinets, O.S., Zainullin, R.A., She-
reshovets, V.V., Kashina, Yu.A., Akhmetov, A.M.,
Kunakova, R.V., and Tolstikov, G.A., Russ. J. Org.
Chem., 2001, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 238 242.
10. Mori, K. and Kuwahara, S., Tetrahedron, 1982,
vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 521 525.
11. Lam Lister, K.P., Hui Raimond, A.H.F., and
Jones, J.B., J. Org. Chem., 1986, vol. 11, no. 11,
pp. 2047 2050.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 38 No. 7 2002