X.-J. Zhang et al.
Bioresource Technology 276 (2019) 154–160
Table 1
Kinetics constants of the HheCPS and HheCPS mutants towards 1,3-DCP and (S)-ECH.
Enzyme
1,3-DCPa
(S)-ECHb
K
m
V
max
k
cat
k
cat/K
m
K
(mM)
m
V
max
k
cat
kcat/K
m
(µmol min−1 mg−1
−
1
)
(s−1)
(mM s−1
−1
)
(µmol min−1 mg−1
−1
)
(s−1)
(mM s−1
)
−1
(mM)
HheCPS
20.8
19.3
16.8
15.8
42.7
34.1
25.9
12.0
17.3
14.2
10.8
5.0
0.83
0.73
0.64
0.32
1.38
4.01
7.31
6.75
0.42
0.49
0.51
0.57
0.18
0.20
0.21
0.24
0.13
0.05
0.03
0.03
HheCPS I81W
HheCPS F86N
HheCPS V94R
a
Reactions were performed in 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 8.0 and 1,3-DCP concentration was varied in range of 10–100 mM.
Reactions were performed with Cl in 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 8.0 and (S)-ECH concentration was varied in range of 10–100 mM.
b
−
previously report (Xue et al., 2015a), and mutant enzymes obtained in
this study exhibited excellent capability to preserve (S)-ECH with high
optical purity.
20 mM substrate was used, (S)-ECH was synthesized with > 99% e.e.
and 63.42% yield catalyzed by HheCPS I81W in a 15-min reaction. High
e.e. (> 99%) of (S)-ECH and 67.08% yield were obtained with HheCPS
F86N in a 20-min reaction. For HheCPS V94R as the catalyst, e.e. of (S)-
ECH > 99% and 57.01% yield were obtained in a 25-min reaction. As
the concentration of 1,3-DCP increased to 40 mM, for HheCPS
I81W, > 99% e.e. and 42.20% yield of (S)-ECH were observed; > 99%
e.e. and 41.77% yield were obtained by HheCPS F86N; for HheCPS
V94R, > 99% e.e. and 28.50% yield of (S)-ECH were obtained. When
the concentration of 1,3-DCP was even higher, the e.e. and yield of (S)-
ECH decreased significantly. But for HheCPS F86N, the ability to syn-
thesize optically pure ECH was better than other mutants, when the
reaction was carried out at the 1,3-DCP concentration of
3.4. Kinetic parameters of HheCPS mutants
The kinetic parameters of HheCPS and HheCPS mutants towards 1,3-
DCP and (S)-ECH were determined to evaluate the forward and reverse
reaction performance. Compared with the parent enzyme, the apparent
kinetic constants (Km(1,3-DCP)) for HheCPS I81W, HheCPS F86N and
HheCPS V94R showed 0.93-, 0.81- and 0.76-fold decreased, respec-
tively. The catalytic number (kcat(1,3-DCP)) of HheCPS I81W and HheCPS
V94R were 0.82- and 0.29-fold decreased and the catalytic efficiency
70 mM, > 99% e.e. and 25.13% yield were obtained while no optically
(
k
cat(1,3-DCP)/Km(1,3-DCP)) were 0.88- and 0.39-fold lower, respectively.
For HheCPS F86N, 0.62-fold lower in catalytic number (kcat(1,3-DCP)) and
.77-fold lower in catalytic efficiency (kcat/K were observed
Table 1).
To illustrate the difference in ring-opening reaction between HheCPS
pure (S)-ECH were generated by HheCPS I81W and HheCPS V94R. In all
the reactions with different concentrations of 1,3-DCP catalyzed by
parent HheCPS, (S)-ECH with > 99% e.e. was not observed.
To further investigate the optical purity of (S)-ECH catalyzed by the
mutants, long term reactions were performed under the substrate con-
centration of 20 mM. As shown in Fig. 2, for the first 15 min, > 99% e.e.
of (S)-ECH was observed for the mutant enzyme of HheCPS I81W,
HheCPS F86N and HheCPS V94R with the yields of 62.32%, 66.65% and
0
m
)
(
and HheCPS mutants, kinetic studies of the reverse reaction were per-
formed. As shown in Table 1, the apparent kinetic constants (Km((S)-
ECH)) of HheCPS I81W, HheCPS F86N and HheCPS V94R were 2.91-, 5.30-
and 4.89-fold higher and the catalytic efficiency (kcat((S)-ECH)/Km((S)-
ECH)) were decreased to 0.38-, 0.23- and 0.23-fold respectively, com-
pared with the parent enzyme. HheCPS mutants effectively suppressed
the catalytic ability of the (S)-ECH in reverse reaction.
5
6.69% respectively, while the 58.32% e.e. and 79.89% yield of (S)-
ECH were obtained for the parent enzyme. As the reaction prolonged,
the e.e. decreased slightly for three HheCPS mutants, while for HheCPS
the e.e. and yield decreased rapidly. After 1-hour reaction, the e.e. of
S)-ECH were 82.29%, 86.25% and 77.74% for HheCPS I81W, HheCPS
F86N and HheCPS V94R, respectively, and the yields were 95.13%,
6.24% and 73.94%, while chiral ECH was racemized for the parent
enzyme within 1-hour reaction.
,
For the forward and reverse reactions, HheC displayed different
catalytic capabilities due to the different kinetic parameters towards
(
1,3-DCP and (S)-ECH. The E values which were defined as [kcat(1,3-DCP)
/
9
K
m(1,3-DCP)]/[kcat((S)-ECH)/Km((S)-ECH)] were largely changed in HheCPS
mutant proteins and were 14.6, 21.3 and 10.7 for HheCPS I81W, HheCPS
F86N and HheCPS V94R respectively, while the E value for HheCPS was
6
.38. Because of the regulation of catalytic efficiencies towards 1,3-DCP
3
.6. Molecule mechanism for kinetic regulation
and (S)-ECH, the reverse reaction rates were significantly inhibited in
the three mutants, while the forward reaction rates still kept in the
considerable levels. Thus the ring opening and racemization of (S)-ECH
were largely reduced. The kinetic mechanisms of HHDHs have been
reported regularly recent years (Schallmey et al., 2013; Xue et al.,
To explore the mechanism for the kinetic regulation of HheCPS
mutants, the structure models were constructed using Modeller 9.19
and were evaluated to be with high quality by Procheck. The channels
of HheCPS and HheCPS mutants were predicted by MOLE 2.0. 1,3-DCP
and (S)-ECH were docked into the active sites of the HheCPS, HheCPS
I81W, HheCPS F86N and HheCPS V94R, respectively, using AutoDock
2
015b; Tang et al., 2005). However, no investigation has been pub-
lished about the relationship of halide ion channels and kinetic para-
meters towards 1,3-DCP and chiral ECH. And the present work is the
first report about the molecule modification to regulate the forward and
reverse reactions. The molecular kinetic modified mutants were sub-
sequently employed for asymmetric synthesis of optically pure ECH.
4
.2.1.
In the parent protein, Ile81, Ala83 and Trp185 formed the cavity to
−
promote the Cl releasing or entering in the forward or reverse reaction
Fig. 3(a)). In HheCPS I81W, the existing cavity was closed by the indole
(
group of Trp81 (Fig. 3(b)). Consequently, the channel was destroyed.
−
3.5. Asymmetric synthesis of (S)-ECH
Due to the difference of Cl concentration in the substrate pocket and
−
the surrounding solution, Cl could be still easily released though other
HheCPS mutants were employed to prepare (S)-ECH with different
channels for the forward reaction. While for the reverse reaction, the
rate of Cl entering was decreased. The docking results showed that the
distances between the hydroxyl hydrogen atom of Ser132 and the hy-
droxyl oxygen atom of 1,3-DCP, the hydroxyl hydrogen atom of 1,3-
DCP and the phenolic hydroxyl oxygen atom of Tyr145, the oxygen
atom of (S)-ECH and the hydroxyl hydrogen atom of Ser132, the oxygen
−
concentrations of 1,3-DCP. As shown in Table 2, when the 1,3-DCP
concentration was 10 mM, the e.e. of (S)-ECH catalyzed by HheCPS
I81W and HheCPS F86N were all > 99%, and the yields were 74.36%
and 79.12% respectively. For HheCPS V94R, the e.e. of > 99% and the
yield of 60.21% for (S)-ECH were obtained in a 25-min reaction. When
157