S. Matthew et al. / Phytochemistry 70 (2009) 2058–2063
2061
Table 3
4. Experimental
Inhibition of porcine pancreatic elastase.
IC50 in
l
Ma
IC50 in
l
Mb
IC50 in
l
Mc
4.1. General experimental procedures
1
2
3
2.14 0.19
6.99 0.74
7.28 0.95
4
5
6
1.41 0.28
0.53 0.19
1.15 0.46
4a
5a
6a
2.94 0.19
2.23 0.08
2.16 0.13
Optical rotation was measured on a Perkin–Elmer 341 polarim-
eter. UV spectra were recorded using a SpectraMax M5 (Molecular
Devices). 1H and 2D NMR spectra for 1 and 2 were recorded in
DMF-d7 on a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 1-
mm high-temperature superconducting cryogenic probe and 3
was recorded in 5 mm cryogenic probe operating at 600 MHz and
150 MHz using residual solvent signals as the internal standard
(dH 8.02, dC 162.7). HSQC experiments were optimized for
1JCH = 145 Hz, and HMBC experiments were optimized for
nJC,H = 7 Hz for 1 and 2 and 10 Hz for 3. HRMS data were obtained
using an Agilent LC-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an
APCI/ESI multimode ion source detector (UCR Mass Spectrometry
Facility, University of California at Riverside), and low resolution
mass spectra were obtained on a A3200 Q TRAP LC/MS/MS (hybrid
triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer, Applied Bio-
systems, USA) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface oper-
ated in positive mode. HPLC-based compound isolation was
performed on a Shimadzu LC-20AT prominence LC with peak
detection by a Shimadzu SPD-M20A prominence diode array
detector.
a
b
c
n = 4.
n = 4 (taken from Matthew et al., 2009).
n = 3.
1:1 suggested the occurrence of epimeric R and S sulfoxides. The IR
absorption at 1037 cmꢀ1 also supported the sulfoxide assignment.
The sulfoxide is most likely an isolation artifact formed by oxida-
tion of the methionine-containing natural product (Matthew
et al., 2008; Gunasekera et al., 2008; Harrigan et al., 1999).
The absolute configuration of all amino acid units in compounds
1–3 was deduced by chiral HPLC of the acid hydrolysis products,
which indicated D configuration for glutamic acid and tyrosine
and L configuration for all other amino acids. However, none of
the chiral HPLC conditions employed were successful in resolving
the D/L-isomeric peaks for Phe. Hence the acid hydrolyzate of 2
was subjected to Marfey’s analysis (Fujii et al., 1997), establishing
L configuration for Phe in 2.
Compounds 1–3 were tested for serine protease-inhibitory
activity. They showed moderate activity against porcine pancreatic
elastase in vitro with IC50 values ranging from 2.14 to 7.28 lM
4.2. Marine cyanobacterial samples
(Table 3). While the described compounds are two to three orders
of magnitudes less potent against the same enzyme or other mam-
malian elastases than lyngbyastatins 4–7 (Matthew et al., 2007;
Taori et al., 2007) or ONO-5046 (Kawabata et al., 1991), prelimin-
ary data suggested some selectivity towards elastase. The activities
of two other serine proteases tested (chymotrypsin, trypsin) were
not compromised by compounds 1–3 at concentrations up to
Samples of L. confervoides were collected at approximately 15 m
depth from reefs near the Port Everglades Inlet, Fort Lauderdale,
Florida, USA (26°05.99020N, 80°05.01840W) in August 2004 and
May and August 2005. S. Golubic identified the cyanobacterium
(Paul et al., 2005) and its 16S rDNA gene sequence has been re-
ported (Paul et al., 2005; Sharp et al., 2009).
50 lM. These results are consistent with those previously reported
for their analogues (4–6) (Matthew et al., 2009). Since we also iso-
lated the corresponding largamide methyl esters 4a–6a (presum-
ably isolation artifacts), we were able to probe the effect of
methylation at that position. Compounds 4a–6a retained
low-micromolar inhibitory activity (Table 3), indicating that the
carboxylic acid residue is not a requisite element for elastase-
inhibitory activity (Matthew et al., 2009).
4.3. Extraction and isolation
The freeze-dried organisms collected through 2004–2005
(ꢁ2700 g dry weight) were extracted with EtOAc–MeOH (1:1) to
afford a crude extract (ꢁ400 g) which was suspended in H2O
(500 mL) then defatted with hexanes (500 mL ꢂ 3; ꢁ2 g). The con-
centrated aqueous layer enriched with salt was further partitioned
between n-BuOH (250 mL ꢂ 3) and H2O. The combined n-BuOH ex-
tract (12 g) was applied on a Diaion HP-20 (Supelco) resin (120 g),
and subsequently fractionated with H2O and increasing concentra-
tions of MeOH, and then with MeCN and finally with CH2Cl2 to
yield 8 fractions [Fr. 1: H2O (100%, 2 L, ꢁ6.8 g); Fr. 2: H2O:MeOH
(80:20, 1 L, 854 mg); Fr. 3: H2O:MeOH (50:50, 1 L, 272 mg); Fr. 4:
H2O:MeOH (50:50–25:75, 1 L, 400 mg); Fr. 5: H2O:MeOH (25:75–
0:100, 1 L, 430 mg); Fr. 6: MeOH (100%, 1 L, 950 mg); Fr. 7: MeCN
(100%, 1 L, 490 mg), Fr. 8: CH2Cl2 (100%, 1 L, 457 mg)]. Fractions 5
and 6 were subjected to reversed-phase preparative HPLC (Phe-
3. Conclusion
The L. confervoides that yielded tiglicamides A–C (1–3) is a par-
ticularly prolific source of secondary metabolites (Matthew et al.,
2007, 2008, 2009; Taori et al., 2007), with already 13 previously re-
ported structures belonging to six different structural families
(Sharp et al., 2009). The similarity to the largamides A–C (4–6)
and, specifically, the variability of the last amino acid position
(N ? C) suggests relaxed substrate specificity of the corresponding
putative biosynthetic NRPS enzyme, allowing the incorporation of
at least six different amino acids, viz. Htyr (1), Phe (2), Met (3), Leu
(4), 2-amino-5-(40-hydroxy-phenyl)pentanoic acid (Ahppa) (5),
and 2-amino-5-(40-hydroxy-phenyl)hexanoic acid (Ahpha) (6) at
that position. Largamides A–C (4–6) were major metabolites in this
cyanobacterium, while tiglicamides A–C (1–3) were only minor
metabolites. It is unclear if the differing yields are reflective of
the relative efficiencies of substrate activation or due to genetic
heterogeneity of the cyanobacterial samples and consequently bio-
synthetic enzymes, although the 16S rDNA sequence was identical
for at least three distinct collections at different times (Sharp et al.,
2009). Detailed genetic studies of this intriguing cyanobacterium
will provide novel insights into the biosynthesis of compounds
1–6 and other co-produced L. confervoides metabolites.
nomenex Luna-C18 10
l, 100 ꢂ 21.20 mm, 5.0 mL/min; PDA detec-
tion at 200–400 nm) using a MeOH–0.05% aqueous TFA linear
gradient (40–100% over 30 min and then MeOH for 15 min). The
largamide- and tiglicamide-rich fractions eluting between tR 15–
25 min were collected and subjected to repeated semipreparative
reversed-phase HPLC (Phenomenex Synergi 4u Hydro-RP,
250 ꢂ 10 mm, 2.0 mL/min; PDA detection at 200–400 nm) using
two sequential linear gradients of MeOH in 0.05% aqueous TFA
(60–90% over 25 min, 90–100% over 10 min) to give semi-pure
compounds 1–6 eluting between tR 16–21 min. The final purifica-
tion of the compounds was achieved by means of a Phenomenex
Luna Phenyl-hexyl column 10 ꢂ 250 mm, using the same HPLC
conditions as described above to afford tiglicamide A (1), tR
16.0 min (1.2 mg), tiglicamide B (2), tR 21.8 min (0.8 mg), and