P. Parhi et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 465 (2008) 380–386
385
Table 3
References
Optical absorption edge energies of metal tungstates measured by diffused
reflectance techniques
[1] M.J. Treadaway, R.C. Powel, Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 862–874.
[2] W. Chen, Y. Inagawa, T. Omatsu, M. Tateda, N. Takeuchi, Y. Usuki, Opt.
Commun. 194 (2001) 401–407.
Composition
Band gap (eV)
CaWO4
SrWO4
BaWO4
ZnWO4
MnWO4
NiWO4
4.75 ± 0.2
4.78 ± 0.2
4.8 ± 0.2
3.9 ± 0.2
2.8 ± 0.2
3.2 ± 0.2
[3] P. Lecoq, I. Dafinei, E. Auffray, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 365
(1995) 291–298.
[4] S. Takai, K. Sugiura, T. Esaka, Mater. Res. Bull. 34 (1999) 193–202.
[5] V. Nagirnyi, E. Feldbach, L.J. Onsson, M. Kirm, A. Lushchik, Ch.
Lushchik, L.L. Nagornaya, V.D. Ryzhikov, F. Savikhiu, G. Svensson, I.A.
Tupitsina, Radiat. Meas. 29 (1998) 247–250.
[
[
6] L.G. Van Uitert, S. Preziosi, J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 2908–2909.
7] H. Ehrenberg, H. Weitzel, C. Heid, H. Fuess, G. Wltschek, T. Kroener,
J. Van Tol, M. Bonnet, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9 (15) (1997) 3189–
3203.
[
[
8] G. Blasse, L.H. Brixner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 173 (1990) 409–411.
9] E.F. Paski, M.W. Blades, Anal. Chem. 60 (11) (1988) 1224–2123.
used to calculate the absorption coefficient from the Kubelka-
Munk [44] function defined as
[
[
10] S.-J. Chen, J. Li, X.-T. Chen, J.-M. Hong, Z. Xue, X.-Z. You, J. Cryst.
Growth 253 (2003) 361–365.
11] F.-S. Wen, X. Zhao, H. Huo, J.-S. Chen, E.-S. Lin, J.-H. Zhang, Mater. Lett.
2
α
S
(1 − R∞)
=
2R
5
5 (2002) 152–157.
[12] L. Zhang, C. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Cheng, Mater. Chem. Phys. 103 (2007)
33–436.
F(R∞) =
4
here α is the absorption coefficient and S the scattering coeffi-
cient, and F(R∞) is the KM function. For the diffused reflectance
spectra, KM function can be used instead of α for estimation
of the optical absorption edge energy [45]. It was observed
that a plot of F(R∞)E versus E was linear near the edge for
direct allowed transition (η = 1/2). The intercept of the line
on abscissa (F(R∞)E = 0) gave the value of optical absorption
edge energy. The values are determined to be ∼4.8 eV for the
scheelite tungstates and around 3 eV for wolframite tungstates.
Figs. 6b and 7b shows the plot of the same. Table 3 summa-
rizes the optical absorption edge energies for all the tungstates
subjected to DR measurements under this study. The diffused
reflectance spectra for direct band gap orthorhombic (β) [46]
[
13] M. Bonanni, L. Spanhel, M. Lerch, E. Fcuglein, G. Mculler, Chem. Mater.
10 (1998) 304–310.
[14] S. Kwan, F. Kim, J. Akana, P. Yang, Chem. Commun. (2001) 447–448.
[
15] J.H. Ryu, J.-W. Yoon, C.S. Lim, W.-C. Oh, K.B. Shim, Ceram. Int. 31
2005) 883–888.
(
[
[
16] V.V. Zyryanov, Inorg. Mater. 36 (2000) 54–58.
17] J.H. Ryu, J.-W. Yoon, C.S. Lim, K.B. Shim, Key Eng. Mater. 317 (2006)
223–226.
[18] J.H. Ryu, J.-W. Yoon, C.S. Lim, K.B. Shim, Electrochem. Solid State Lett.
(2005) D15–D18.
19] D. Chen, G. Shen, K. Tang, H. Zheng, Y. Qian, Mater. Res. Bull. 38 (2003)
783.
8
[
[
1
20] X. Zhao, T.L.Y. Chung, X. Zhang, D.H.L. Ng, J. Yu, A. Amer. Ceram. Soc.
89 (2006) 2960–2963.
[21] J. Gopalakrishnan, T. Sivakumar, K. Ramesha, V. Thangadurai, G.N. Sub-
banna, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 6237–6241.
[
Ta2O preparedbyheatingTametalinairisalsostudiedforcom-
5
22] T. Sivakumar, S.E. Lofland, K.V. Ramanujachary, K. Ramesha, G.N. Sub-
banna, J. Gopalakrishnan, J. Solid State Chem. 177 (2004) 2635–2638.
parison. The value of optical absorption edge energy for indirect
allowed transition for Ta2O was found to be 4.0 ± 0.2 eV,
5
[23] T.K. Mandal, J. Gopalakrishnan, J. Mater. Chem. 14 (2004) 1273–1280.
[24] R. Mani, N.S.P. Bhuvanesh, K.V. Ramanujachary, W. Green, S.E. Lofland,
J. Gopalakrishnan, J. Mater. Chem. 17 (2007) 1589–1592.
[
[
which is consistent with the value reported in the literature
[
47].
25] E.G. Gillan, R.B. Kaner, J. Mater. Chem. 11 (2001) 1951–1956.
26] J.B. Wiley, E.G. Gillan, R.B. Kaner, Mater. Res. Bull. 28 (1993) 893–900.
4
. Conclusions
[27] P. Parhi, V. Manivannan, Mater. Res. Bull., in press.
[28] V. Thangadurai, C. Knittlmayer, W. Weppner, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 106 (2004)
2
28–233.
Novel solid-state metathesis approach has been employed to
[
[
[
29] S.M. Montemayor, A.F. Fuentes, Ceram. Int. 30 (2004) 393–400.
30] R.E. Treece, J.A. Conklin, R.B. Kaner, Inorg. Chem. 33 (1994) 5701–5707.
31] P.R. Bonneau, R.F. Jarvis, R.B. Kaner, Nature 349 (1991) 510–512.
[32] A.M. Nartowski, I.P. Parkin, M. MacKenzie, A.J. Craven, I. Macleod, J.
Mater. Chem. 9 (1999) 1275–1281.
33] J.C. Fitzmaurice, A.L. Hector, I.P. Parkin, A.T. Rowley, Phosphorus Sulfur
Silicon 101 (1995) 47–55.
34] L. Rao, E.G. Gillan, R.B. Kaner, J. Mater. Res. 10 (1995) 353–361.
35] T.K. Mandal, J. Gopalakrishnan, Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 2310–2316.
synthesize technologically important tungstate materials. SEM
showed well-defined morphology for most of the tungstates pre-
pared by this method, which have distinct advantages in terms of
simplicity, easyscaleup, andarerelativelyinexpensivewithhigh
yield. Optical absorption edge energies for the tungstates synthe-
sized in this study have been determined. The thermodynamic
factors, which are the fundamental force behind the design of
SSM reactions are considered, and the overall enthalpy released
in the reaction is calculated.
[
[
[
[36] P. Parhi, A. Ramanan, A.R. Ray, Mater. Lett. 60 (2006) 218–222.
[
[
37] P. Parhi, A. Ramanan, A.R. Ray, Mater. Lett. 58 (2004) 3610–3612.
38] JCPDS Card No. 77-2234, 08-0490, 72-0746, ICDD, PCPDFWIN v.2.1,
JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data, 2000.
Acknowledgement
[39] JCPDS Card No. 72,484, 80-134, 73-0554, ICDD, PCPDFWIN v.2.1,
JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data, 2000.
[
[
[
40] E.G. Gillan, R.B. Kaner, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 333–343.
41] J.J. Mack, S. Tari, R.B. Kaner, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2006) 4243–4246.
42] A.M. Nartowski, I.P. Parkin, M. Mackenzie, A.J. Craven, I. MacLeod, J.
Mater. Chem. 9 (1999) 1275–1281.
The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Allan Kirk-
patrick, Head of Department, Mechanical Engineering for his
continued help, encouragement and support.