1860
D. A. Perrey, F. M. Uckun / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 1859–1861
Table 2. Comparison of the yields obtained using the sodium ethoxide/ethanol versus the ammonia/methanol reaction
conditions for the S-alkylation of various cysteine thiol derivatives with several different alkyl bromides
Entry
Thiol
Bromide
Yield
NH3/MeOH
NaOEt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
3-Mercaptopropionic acid
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
Acetyl-cysteine
(Bromomethyl)cyclohexane
1-Bromo-2-ethylbutane
1-Bromododecane
1-Bromododecane
1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane
2-Bromopropane
73
90
83
68
28a
58
45
96
99
48
0
0
98
21
0
0
Bromoethane
35
99
97
73
trans, trans-Farnesyl bromide
trans-Geranyl bromide
1-Bromododecane
10
Cysteine methyl ester
a Yield obtained after 12 hour reflux.
nucleophiles. In this case, however, the reaction did not
proceed satisfactorily, giving poor yields of highly
impure product. Using 1-iodo-2-methylpropane instead
of its bromo counterpart did produce pure product in a
33% yield, although the lack of commercially available
iodides does limit this approach. Most of the other
methods provided no improvement and simply yielded
starting material upon work-up. In contrast, the reac-
tions which employed a sodium alkoxide (Table 1,
entries 5 and 6) gave a pure product with no trace of
either the alkyl bromide or the cysteine starting materi-
als.8 Additionally, the reaction involving sodium ethox-
ide produced a precipitate of NaBr, which indicated
that the reaction was proceeding. This precipitate only
formed while the reaction mixture was refluxing, how-
ever; at room temperature, no precipitate was produced
and no appreciable reaction occurred.
and 1-bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane under the new or the
standard conditions; only after prolonged reflux was
any significant material produced using the new
method. This result suggests that while the method
involving sodium ethoxide gives greatly improved yields
for many branched alkyl bromides, reactions involving
alkyl bromides that have a large amount of steric
hindrance due to their highly branched nature (e.g.
1-bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane) are still inherently
inefficient.
Two other thiols (Table 2, entries 4 and 10) were also
studied to ascertain the effects of the amino group of
cysteine (the amino group is absent in 3-mercaptopropi-
onic acid, entry 4; cysteine methyl ester, entry 10,
contains a free amino group) on the utility of the
method involving sodium ethoxide. For the reaction of
3-mercaptopropionic acid with 1-bromododecane, an
enormous improvement in yield was obtained using the
new method (the yields using the method involving
sodium ethoxide and the literature method of Brown et
al. are 68 and 21%, respectively; Table 2). In contrast,
the yield obtained for the reaction involving the cys-
teine methyl ester was reduced when using sodium
ethoxide. These results suggest that while the method
utilizing sodium ethoxide is clearly superior to its
ammonia/methanol counterpart in some instances, in
particular for reactions involving branched alkyl bro-
mides, the reactions involving either a cysteine deriva-
tive bearing a free amino group or a less-hindered alkyl
bromide (such as a straight-chain alkyl bromide or an
isoprenyl bromide) benefit little from using this method.
Given the above results, the general utility of the
method involving a sodium alkoxide was explored.
Sodium ethoxide was selected for these studies rather
than sodium methoxide since the formation of a precip-
itate when using the former provides a convenient
visual indicator that the reaction is progressing. The
reactions between N-acetyl cysteine and a variety of
alkyl bromides were examined under these conditions
(Table 2). Good yields were obtained for many of the
bromides used, in several cases marking a substantial
improvement over the results obtained using the litera-
ture method. In fact, for some of the alkyl bromides
(e.g. 1-bromo-2-ethylbutane, Table 2, entry 2) the
desired product was generated in excellent yield,
whereas no product was obtained following the litera-
ture method. For the isoprenyl bromides (Table 2,
entries 8 and 9), comparable yields were obtained using
the new method and the literature procedure. However,
there was little or no reaction between N-acetyl cysteine
One concern with using such relatively harsh basic
conditions is the danger of racemization. Comparison
of N-acetyl-S-dodecyl-L-cysteine samples made via the
ammonia/methanol and sodium ethoxide methods