6 of 7
STOLARSKA ET AL.
DDA), 132.8(8C, CH¼CH), 165.0(4C, NHCOCH=CH), 169.0‐174.5(8C,
NHCO‐MA, NHCO‐MA), 170.9(4C, COOMe), 172.1(CO‐C1‐DDA)
(19a) C98H158N18O17*4HCl, M.W. 2006,25
MS (ESI, H2O): m/z: 981[M + 2H]2+, 953[M + 2Na]2+, 1861[M +
H]+
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO), δ: 0.85 (m, 3H, CH3‐DDA), 1.3‐1.4 (m,
82H, C (CH3)3,γ‐Lys), 1.45‐2.0 (m, 40H, β, δ‐Lys, C2‐11‐DDA), 2.5‐2.9
(m, 13H, ε‐Lys, C1‐DDA), 3.0‐3.8 (m, 32H, NHCH2CH2NH,
NCH2CH2CO), 3.85‐4.1 (m, 5H, α‐Lys), 6.5‐7.2 (m, 13H, NHCO), 7.1‐
8.0 (m, 12 H, NHCO)
fungal strains. The analysis of their antifungal properties indicates that
the examined molecules are efficient growth inhibitors of fluconazole‐
resistant hospital‐acquired strains. Moreover, application of amphi-
philic branched peptides such as FMDP carriers suggests that trans-
port mechanism involves more likely the cell membrane perturbation
than the mediation of the specific transport proteins.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk Univer-
sity of Technology, Gdansk, Poland, The Center for Advanced Studies
Project, Gdansk, Poland, and National Science Center: Opus 2012/07/
B/ST5/01941.
(19b) C130H198N26O33*4HCl, M.W. 2798,96
MS (ESI, H2O): m/z: 885[M + 3H]3+, 907[M + 3Na]3+, 1349[M +
2Na]2+
ORCID
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO), δ: 0.85 (m, 3H, CH3‐DDA), 1.3‐1.4 (m,
82H, C (CH3)3,γ‐Lys), 1.45‐2.0 (m, 40H, β, δ‐Lys, C2‐11‐DDA), 2.5‐2.9
(m, 13H, ε‐Lys, C1‐DDA), 3.0‐3.8 (m, 52H, CCHCH2‐FMDP,
NHCH2CH2NH, NCH2CH2CO, OCH3‐FMDP), 3.85‐4.1 (m, 9H, α‐
Lys, α‐FMDP), 6.5‐7.2 (m, 21H, CH¼CH‐FMDP, NHCO), 7.1‐8.0 (m,
12 H, NHCO)
REFERENCES
1. Nucci M, Perfect JR. When primary antifungal therapy fails. Clin. Infect.
Dis. 2008;46(9):1426‐1433.
(21a) C38H59N7O8*2HCl, M.W. 858,85
2. Zgódka D, Milewski S, Borowski E. A diffusible analogue of N(3)‐(4‐
methoxyfumaroyl)‐L‐2,3‐diaminopropanoic acid with antifungal activ-
ity. Microbiology. 2001;147(Pt 7):1955‐1959.
MS (ESI, H2O): m/z: 787[M + H]+
1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O), δ: 1.2 (m, 6H, γ‐Lys), 1.4 (m, 6H, δ‐Lys),
1.7‐1.9 (m, 6H, β‐Lys), 2.4 (m, 6H, ε‐Lys), 3.0 (s, 1H, NHCHCH2OH‐
Ser), 3.4 (m. 2H, NHCHCH2OH‐Ser), 3.6 (s, 4H, CH2‐Ar), 3.75‐4.25
(m, 4H, α‐Lys, α‐Ser), 4.7 (m, 10H, Ar), 6.6‐6.9 (m, 1H, COOH‐Ser)
(23a) C39H63N7O8*2HCl, M.W. 828,87
3. Wakieć R, Gabriel I, Prasad R, Becker JM, Payne JW, Milewski S.
Enhanced susceptibility to antifungal oligopeptides in yeast strains
overexpressing ABC multidrug efflux pumps. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2008;52(11):4057‐4063.
MS (ESI, H2O): m/z: 379[M + 2H]2+, 757[M + H]+,
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO), δ: 1.2 (m, 6H, γ‐Lys), 1.3‐1.9 (m, 18H,
β, δ‐Lys, C2‐4‐But), 2.2‐2.5 (m, 6H, ε‐Lys), 3.0‐3.8 (m, 2H, C1‐But), 3.9‐
4.5 (m, 4H, α‐Lys, OH‐But), 5.4 (s, 14H, Ar)
4. Zielinska P, Staniszewska M, Bondaryk M, et al. Design and studies of
multiple mechanism of anti‐Candida activity of a new potent Trp‐rich
peptide dendrimers. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;105:106‐119.
5. Dupont S, Lemetais G, Ferreira T, Cayot P, Gervais P, Beney L. Ergos-
terol biosynthesis:
a fungal pathway for life on land? Evolution.
2012;66(9):2961‐2968.
|
4.4
In vitro antimicrobial activity
6. McEwen C, Gutteridge S. Analysis of the inhibition of the ergosterol
pathway in fungi using the atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP)
method. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007;18(7):1274‐1278.
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for fungal strains were
determined four times by the serial twofold microdilution method
in YNB medium with ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source at pH
5.0 as described before10 and in RPMI 1640 medium (pH 7.0),
according to the CLSI recommendations (M27‐A3 document, Clinical
Laboratory Standards Institute 2008).23 Analogous tests were pro-
vided for bacterial strains, using Mueller Hinton Broth 2 medium at
pH 7.3, followed by procedure described in the CLSI M07‐A10 doc-
ument.24,25 Optical cell density was measured using the microplate
reader Victor3, Perkin Elmer. The MIC value was defined as the min-
imal concentration of compound inhibiting the growth of the cells in
comparison with the positive control. Obtained results were com-
pared with the control molecule, FMDP. Tests were performed on
both wild and clinical strains.
7. Massiere F, Badet‐Denisot MA. The mechanism of glutamine‐depen-
dent amidotransferases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1998;54(3):205‐222.
8. Andruszkiewicz R, Chmara H, Milewski S, Borowski E. Synthesis of N3‐
fumaramoyl‐L‐2,3‐diaminopropanoic acid analogues, the irreversible
inhibitors of glucosamine synthetase. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1986;27
(5):449‐453.
9. Nowak‐Jary J, Andruszkiewicz R. Antifungal activity of thionated ana-
logues of Nva‐FMDP and Lys‐Nva‐FMDP. Pol J Microbiol. 2009;58
(4):295‐299.
10. Pawlak D, Stolarska M, Wojciechowski M, Andruszkiewicz R. Synthe-
sis, anticandidal activity of N(3)‐(4‐methoxyfumaroyl)‐(S)‐2,3‐
diaminopropanoic amide derivatives—novel inhibitors of glucosamine‐
6‐phosphate synthase. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;90:577‐582.
11. Pawlak D, Schielmann M, Wojciechowski M, Andruszkiewicz R. Syn-
thesis and biological activity of novel ester derivatives of N(3)‐(4‐
metoxyfumaroyl)‐(S)‐2,3‐diaminopropanoic acid containing amide and
keto function as inhibitors of glucosamine‐6‐phosphate synthase.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016;26:3586‐3589.
|
5
CONCLUSION
A series of peptide dendrimers and their conjugates with an antifungal
agent FMDP were synthesized and tested. All compounds displayed
much better activity against the tested strains than FMDP itself. The
most promising molecules were tested against a broad selection of
12. Zgódka D, Jędrzejczak R, Milewski S, Borowski E. Amide and ester
derivatives of N3‐(4‐methoxyfumaroyl)‐(S)‐2,3‐diaminopropanoic acid:
the selective inhibitor of glucosamine‐6‐phosphate synthase. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2001;9(4):931‐938.