followed by completion of the peptide sequence, phos-
phitylation on the solid phase, coupling of the adenosine
moiety by H-phosphonate activation (Pybop), and sub-
sequent oxidation. The peptide is then removed from the
solid support by acidolytic cleavage. The interassembly
approach to adenylylated Ser- and Thr-containing pep-
tides carriesa numberof inherentproblems, suchaslimited
applicability to oxidation-sensitive peptide sequences
(methionine and tryptophanoxidation), pooroverallyield,
and low functional group compatibility.9 Although limited
in synthetic scope, the interassembly protocol was recently
used to prepare peptides containing adenylylated Thr,
which were successfully employed as antigens for raising
of antibodies.10 With our applications in mind, we found
this protocol incompatible with our demands on synthesis
flexibility, as well as functional group tolerance.
Initially, we investigated serine and threonine building
blocks in the form of phosphotriesters masked by
β-cyanoethyl protection (CNE) in analogy to caged phospho-
amino acid building blocks.11 In our previous work on
tyrosine adenylylation, we successfully employed β-cya-
noethyl protection, which was cleaved under the first
piperidine treatment after AMP-building block coupling,
thus leading to clean conversion into the unprotected
phosphodiester.9 In the case of fully protected adenyly-
lated threonine and serine (1, 2), β-cyanoethyl-protection
led to a large amount of β-elimination product under
standard coupling conditions (Figure 2, A). In this case,
peptide coupling could only be carried out under base-free
conditions, which resulted in incomplete couplings, as well
as prolonged reaction times, not compatible with efficient
parallel peptide synthesis. Therefore, we envisioned a more
general strategy, based on unprotected phosphodiester
intermediates such as 3 and 4, as the phosphodiester is a
poor leaving group in monoanionic form, it should sup-
press β-elimination product formation (Figure 2, B).
The general strategy for the synthesis of fully protected
adenylylated building blocks of serine and threonine is
outlined in Scheme 1. NR-Fmoc-serine (5) and NR-Fmoc-
threonine (6) were converted to corresponding allyl esters
(7, 8) by treatment with allyl bromide under standard
conditions.12 Next, N6,N6-bis-Boc-20,30-isopropylidenea-
denosine (9) was treated with 1-(allyloxy)-1-chloro-N,N-
diisopropylphosphinamine (10), under basic conditions
(DIPEA) yielding building block 11.13,14 We found it
essential to purify 11 over a short silica gel column in order
to achieve high yields in the subsequent steps. Compound
11 is highly unstable and should be used immediately after
Figure 1. Adenylylation of protein substrate at tyrosine and
threonine residues by adenylyl transferase.
in RhoA, Thr35 in Cdc42 and Rac1) subfamily of small
GTPases,3 whereas the protein IbpA of Histophilus somni
adenylylates a tyrosine residue of the same proteins (Tyr34
in RhoA, Tyr32 in Cdc42 and Rac1).6 The substrates of the
effector protein DrrA/SidM from the human pathogen
Legionella pneumophila are GTPases from the Rab-sub-
family, with the modified tyrosine being in the switch
II-region (Tyr77 in Rab1b).4 VopS and IbpA belong to the
FIC family, a protein family withmore than2700 members
of sequentially homologous proteins.7 Although the sub-
strates of VopS and IbpA have been identified, the physi-
ological protein substrates of DrrA and the remaining
members of the FIC family proteins are less clear. We
hypothesizedthat identificationofphysiological substrates
of adenylylating proteins (e.g., FIC domains) could be
aided by antibodies that specifically recognize adenylyl-
ated proteins in eukaryotic cells or cell lysates. Recently,
we reported a convenient synthesis of an AMP-tyrosine
building block for standard Fmoc solid-phase peptide
synthesis, as well as generation of anti-adenylyl-Tyr
antibodies.8 Herein, we present the extension from adenylyl-
ated tyrosine residues to adenylylated threonine and serine
containing peptides by solid-phase peptide synthesis, ac-
cording to the standard Fmoc-protocol, with preformed
stable building blocks. Until now, peptides adenyl-
ylated at serine or threonine have only been avaliable
through synthesis via the interassembly approach. In the
interassembly protocol, the peptide is constructed under
SPPS conditions until the amino acid to be adenylylated (Ser,
Thr), which is incorporated without side-chain protection,
(9) Al-Eryania, R. A.; Yan, L.; Ball, H. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51 (13), 1730–1731.
(10) Hao, Y. H.; Chuang, T.; Ball, H. L.; Luong, P.; Li, Y.; Flores-
Saaib, R. D.; Orth, K. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 151 (3), 251–254.
(11) Rothman, D. M.; Vazquez, M. E.; Vogel, E. M.; Imperiali, B.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68 (17), 6795–6798.
(6) Worby, C. A.; Mattoo, S.; Kruger, R. P.; Corbeil, L. B.; Koller,
A.; Mendez, J. C.; Zekarias, B.; Lazar, C.; Dixon, J. E. Mol. Cell 2009,
34 (1), 93–103.
(12) Ficht, S.; Payne, R. J.; Guy, R. T.; Wong, C.-H. Chem.;Eur. J.
2008, 14 (12), 3620–3629.
(7) Kinch, L. N.; Yarbrough, M. L.; Orth, K.; Grishin, N. V. PLoS
ONE 2009, 4 (6), e5818.
(13) Ikeuchi, H.; Meyer, M. E.; Ding, Y.; Hiratake, J.; Richards,
N. G. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17 (18), 6641–6650.
(14) Wippoa, H.; Recka, F.; Kudicka, R.; Ramaseshanb, M.;
Ceulemansa, G.; Bollia, M.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Eschenmoser, A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9 (9), 2411–2428.
€
€
(8) Smit, C.; Blumer, J.; Eerland, M. F.; Albers, M. F.; Muller, M. P.;
Goody, R. S.; Itzen, A.; Hedberg, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
9200–9204.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011
6015