site of highest affinity for R-(ꢀ)-KP and the secondary one for
S-(þ)-KP. It is reasonable to admit that site II in subdomain
IIIA represents the main binding site for S-(þ)-KP and the
secondary one for R-(ꢀ)-KP. The satisfactory reproduction of
the CD of the rac-KP : BSA system (data not shown, see results
section), within the model of coexistence of 1 : 1 S-(þ)-KP :
BSA, 1 : 1 R-(ꢀ)-KP : BSA plus 1 : 1 : 1 S-(þ)-KP : R-(ꢀ)-KP :
BSA conjugates, furtherly support these conclusions. The fact
that chiral recognition of KP by BSA involves location of the
‘‘first bound’’ molecule of each drug enantiomer in different
parts of the biomolecule is directly relevant to the interpreta-
tion of displacement data in competitive binding experiments
involving rac-KP.28
The binding between KP and the protein matrix appears to
be stereoselective in both sites, where specific interactions and
essentially hydrophobic conditions are capable of imposing a
high rigidity to the aromatic carbonyl chromophore. This is
supported by the shape of the CD spectra of the diastereomeric
complexes, well distinct and structured with occupation of
either one or both protein sites (Fig. 1C and 2C). Chiral
recognition manifested by the spectra was not reflected in the
association constants for both the 1 : 1 and the 2 : 1 associates.
Indeed differences in Kij between S-(þ) and R-(ꢀ) did not
exceed the experimental uncertainty (Table 1).
It was previously proposed that in this system binding of KP
to a hydrophilic site of BSA would generate an unstructured
positive CD band with both enantiomers.11,12 This was not
confirmed by the present study. In our experimental conditions
an unstructured positive CD band developed only if the KP
solutions were not adequately protected from ambient light
during the manipulations and was attributed to sample photo-
degradation. Indeed KP in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 under-
goes efficient photodecarboxylation with formation of 3-ethyl-
benzophenone (3-EB), as main photoproduct.3,4 CD of the 3-
EB : BSA system was actually characterized by an unstruc-
tured, positive band in the 300–380 nm region, with a maxi-
mum at 330 nm (data not shown).
An unstructured, positive CD, analogous to that with 3-EB,
was generated with the KP-ester. This indicates that the
association of KP enantiomers to BSA at neutral pH is assisted
by the ionic interaction between the carboxylate group of the
propionic substituent of the drug and a positively charged
NH31 group of the protein. Moreover, the DDe values at 290–
300 nm (Fig. 1C and 2C) support that aromatic aminoacids
(Trp or Tyr) are involved in the binding. A stacking interaction
via the p systems has already been proposed for the binding of
KP to flavoprotein.21
We notice that the correlation between CD changes and
specific interactions at each binding site is not straightforward
in the higher order complexes, because the overall protein
conformation could be modified upon sequential association
of drug molecules to subdomains IIA and IIIA, which share a
common interface.26 However, at least for the 1 : 1 BSA-KP
complexes, a theoretical rationalization of the stereospecificity
effects observed is possible. Indeed the optical activity induced
in a chromophore by a chiral environment can be described by
the sum of three terms, relying on one-electron, dipole–dipole
(d–d) and electric–magnetic interaction (m–m) mechanisms.
The first term derives from the interaction of the electric and
magnetic transition dipole moments relevant to different elec-
tronic states of the chomophore and represents a small con-
tribution in case of state mixing due to the electrostatic field of
the host cavity. The second term, d–d, is particularly suited to
describe the induced circular dichroism of guests with low-
lying, allowed p,p* states and has been widely utilised, in the
approximate form, using the polarizability of the host states.27
The third term, m–m, can be very important for symmetry-
forbidden or weakly allowed n,p* transitions, such as in the
present case, and indeed has been shown to adequately repro-
duce the circular dichroism of carbonyls29 and peptides.30
According to Tinoco,31 this term is expressed by:
ꢂ
ꢀ
ꢁꢃ
XX
mjb0na þ lj0bmi0anb
hðn2b ꢀ n2aÞ
R0aðmꢀm Þ ¼ ꢀ2
Im Via0;j0b mi0a
j¼i b¼a
ð1Þ
where
Via0,j0b ¼ lia0 ꢃ Tij ꢃ lj0b
(2)
and
"
#
3RijRij
R2ij
1
R3ij
Tij
¼
1 ꢀ
ð3Þ
In eqn (1) m and l stand for the magnetic transition dipole
moment of the guest and electric transition dipole moment of
the host, respectively, h for Planck’s constant and Im for
imaginary part. The sums extend over all the excited states a
and b, having frequencies of na and nb, and over the bonds i and
j of the chromophore and of the surrounding host residues,
respectively. The geometrical factor V of eqn (2) contains Tij,
the dipole interaction tensor, which is a direct function of the
distance Rij between the bonds i and j (eqn (3)), and is
responsible for the stereospecificity effects in host–guest bind-
ing. We notice that the structure of a variety of cyclodextrin
complexes, determined by this way, was accurate enough to
account for the spectroscopic, photophysical and photochemi-
cal behavior of such systems.32 A reliable calculation of this
term in the present case would require knowledge of the spatial
coordinates of the aminoacid residues surrounding the drug
chromophore in the protein pocket as well as optimisation of
the geometry of the protein–drug associated species. The X-ray
structure of HSA can be used to this purpose. This treatment,
which was outside the purpose of the present paper mainly
devoted to the experimental determination of the stereospeci-
ficity effects, is presently under consideration in our laboratory.
Conclusions
In this study, by an approach involving both spectroscopic and
photophysical methods, a specific characterization of the drug :
protein conjugates has been achieved. The knowledge gained
on the sites of binding and on the properties of the diaster-
eomeric complexes, can be used to gain insight into the
geometry of the association. Indeed the CD spectra of the
1 : 1 conjugates, remarkably different each other and, presum-
ably, not much influenced by conformational changes in the
protein moiety (which, on the contrary, could substantially affect
the spectral properties of the 2 : 1 species) can be combined with
suitable molecular mechanics and rotational strength calcula-
tions and give stereospecific structural information.
Finally, it worth noting that the photodegradation quantum
yield of R-(ꢀ)-KP had been reported to be ca. 40% higher than
that of S-(þ)-KP at molar KP : BSA ratio of 1.27.12 In the light
of the information gained in the present study, the photochem-
istry of KP enantiomers in the BSA matrix was reinvestigated
and found to be stereoselective and dependent on the stoichio-
metry of the association.33
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Giancarlo Marconi (ISOF-CNR) for useful
discussions relevant to the theoretical interpretation of the
stereospecificity effects in circular dichroism. This work was
performed with financial support of the CNR of Italy within
the frame of the project ‘‘Ligand–receptor interactions in
model systems for cellular adhesion’’ and of MIUR (Rome,
Italy).
T h i s j o u r n a l i s & T h e O w n e r S o c i e t i e s 2 0 0 5
P h y s . C h e m . C h e m . P h y s . , 2 0 0 5 , 7 , 4 0 0 2 – 4 0 0 8
4007