Table 2 (continued )
Entry Product
salt to trifluoromethyl ketones gave the addition intermediate,
followed by the decarboxylation to afford the desired aldol
product (Fig. 2b).
b
c
Yield (%)
ee (%)
In conclusion, we have successfully developed the first
organocatalyzed enantioselective decarboxylative ketone
aldol reaction of b-ketoacids with trifluoromethyl ketones by
employing chiral cinchona alkaloids as efficient catalysts. A
series of chiral trifluoromethyl-substituted tertiary alcohols
were obtained in good to high yields (60–98%) and enantio-
selectivities (60–90% ee). Further investigations to understand
the mechanism and to improve the enantioselectivity are
underway.
1
7
3q
3r
94
64
18
98
61
a
The reaction was carried out with b-ketoacid 1a (0.2 mmol) and
trifluoromethyl ketone 2a (0.1 mmol) in THF (0.6 mL), using 20%
b
c
(DHQD)
excess was determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
2
AQN at ꢀ40 1C for 28 h. Isolated yield. Enantiomeric
This work was supported financially by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 20972110
and 20902067).
Notes and references
1
2
3
J. Staunton and K. J. Weissman, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2001, 18, 380.
For a review, see: Y. Pan and C.-H. Tan, Synthesis, 2011, 2044.
For the catalytic enantioselective decarboxylative aldol reactions
of MAHTs and their equivalents, see: (a) S. Orlandi, M. Benaglia
and F. Cozzi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 1747; (b) D. Magdziak,
G. Lalic, H. M. Lee, K. C. Fortner, A. D. Aloise and M. D. Shair,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 7284; (c) K. C. Fortner and
M. D. Shair, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1032;
(
d) D. J. Schipper, S. Rousseaux and K. Fagnou, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 8343; (e) J. Baudoux, P. Lefebvre, R. Legay,
M.-C. Lasne and J. Rouden, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 252;
Scheme 1 Scaled-up version of the decarboxylative aldol reaction,
(
f) N. Hara, S. Nakamura, Y. Funahashi and N. Shibata, Adv.
and further transformation.
Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 2976; (g) X.-J. Li, H.-Y. Xiong,
M.-Q. Hua, J. Nie, Y. Zheng and J.-A. Ma, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2
012, 53, 2117.
4
5
For the catalytic enantioselective decarboxylative Mannich reac-
tions of MAHTs and their equivalents, see: (a) A. Ricci,
D. Pettersen, L. Bernardi, F. Fini, M. Fochi, R. P. Herrera and
V. Sgarzani, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1037; (b) L. Yin,
M. Kanai and M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9610;
(c) Y. Pan, C. W. Kee, Z. Jiang, T. Ma, Y. Zhao, Y. Yang, H. Xue
and C.-H. Tan, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 30, 8363.
For the catalytic enantioselective decarboxylative Michael addition
reactions of MAHTs and their equivalents, see: (a) J. Lubkoll and
H. Wennemers, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6841;
(
b) M. Furutachi, S. Mouri, S. Matsunaga and M. Shibasaki,
Chem.–Asian J., 2010, 15, 2351; (c) H. Y. Bae, S. Some, J. H. Lee,
J.-Y. Kim, M. J. Song, S. Lee, Y. J. Zhang and C. E. Song,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 3196.
6 D. A. Evans, S. Mito and D. Seidel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007,
129, 11583.
1
9
Fig. 2 (a) F NMR monitoring of the reaction mixture of b-ketoacid
a, trifluoromethyl ketone 2a, and NEt in THF-d as a function of time
1
3
8
7
8
K. Rohr and R. Mahrwald, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 1878.
For selected reviews, see: (a) B. List, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 5573;
at 0 1C; (b) proposed mechanism for the organocatalytic decarboxylative
aldol reaction of b-ketoacids with trifluoromethyl ketones.
(
b) P. I. Dalko and L. Moisan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
1
0
43, 5138; (c) W. Notz, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas III., Acc. Chem.
Res., 2004, 37, 580; (d) Asymmetric Organocatalysis, ed.
A. Berkessel and H. Grcger, Wiley-VCH, New York, 2005;
(e) Enantioselective Organocatalysis, ed. P. I. Dalko, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2007; (f) S. Mukherjee, J. W. Yang, S. Hoffmann and
B. List, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5471.
For the achiral decarboxylative aldol reactions with metal catalysts
and organocatalysts, see: (a) M. Stiles, D. Wolf and G. V. Hudson,
¨
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959, 81, 628; (b) H. Brunner, J. Muller and
reported in the literature. Further reduction of enantio-
enriched 3a in the presence of NaBH gave trifluoromethylated
4
diols 4 and 5 (1 : 1 dr), which were easily isolated through
silica gel column chromatography in 98% yield with excellent
enantiomeric purities (98% ee).
9
1
9
It was noteworthy that F NMR analysis of the reaction
progress between 1a and 2a with triethylamine in THF-d8
revealed the appearance of a new peak (at ꢀ85.05 ppm) that
J. Spitzer, Monatsh. Chem., 1996, 127, 845; (c) T. Kourouli,
P. Kefalas, N. Ragoussis and V. Ragoussis, J. Org. Chem., 2002,
1
2
was tentatively assigned as the reaction intermediate (A).
6
7, 4615; (d) G. Lalic, A. D. Aloise and M. D. Shair, J. Am. Chem.
With the disappearance of this intermediate A and the reactant
Soc., 2003, 125, 2852; (e) N. Blaquiere, D. G. Shore, S. Rousseaux
and K. Fagnou, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 6190.
0 Z.-J. Liu, Y.-Q. Mei and J.-T. Liu, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 855.
1 The recycling and reuse of (DHQD)AQN in the model reaction:
product 3a was obtained in 97% yield with 89% ee.
2
a (ꢀ72.35 ppm) from the catalytic system, the aldol product
a (at ꢀ80.95 ppm) was formed (Fig. 2a). Based on these
1
1
3
preliminary results, a stepwise process could be involved in the
catalytic cycle, in which nucleophilic addition of the ketoacid
12 All attempts to isolate this postulated intermediate failed.
4
310 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4308–4310
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012