Communications
[
10]
this substance were recognized only by streptavidin. Micro-
spots containing biotin display much stronger fluorescence
than strep-tag microspots because the binding affinity of
streptavidin to biotin is much greater than that of streptavidin
2001, 8, 105; e) S. R. Weinberger, E. A. Dalmasso, E. T. Fung,
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 86.
4] For reviews of carbohydrate microarrays, see: a) I. Shin, J. W.
Cho, D. W. Boo, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2004,
[
7, 565; b) I. Shin, S. Park, M.-R. Lee, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, in press;
[
11]
to the strep tag.
Interestingly, microspots produced by
c) T. Feizi, W. Chai, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 582; d) T.
Feizi, F. Fazio, W. Chai, C.-H. Wong, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
2003, 13, 637.
reaction of L-tethered substrates bound to the corresponding
proteins more tightly than those with S-tethered substrates.
The fluorescence intensities of microspots containing L-
tethered compounds are more than twice as strong as those
of microspots containing S-tethered ones.
Small-molecule microarrays with four phenanthridinium
derivatives were also fabricated by following the method
described above. Fluorescence analysis of slides treated with
Cy5-AChE showed that substituted phenanthridinium deriv-
atives bound to the proteins more strongly than their
[5] a) D. P. Walsh, Y. T. Chang, Comb. Chem. High Throughput
Screening 2004, 7, 565; b) A. N. Koehler, A. F. Shamji, S. L.
Schreiber, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8420; c) M. Kꢀhn, R.
Wacker, C. Peters, H. Schrꢀder, L. Soulꢁre, R. Breinbauer, C. M.
Niemeyer, H. Waldmann, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 6010; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5830, and references therein; d) F. G.
Kuruvilla, A. F. Shamji, S. M. Sternson, P. J. Hergenrother, S. L.
Schreiber, Nature 2002, 416, 653; e) K. S. Lam, M. Renil, Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 353.
[
12]
[6] a) F. Stieber, U. Grether, H. Waldmann, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9,
unsubstituted derivatives (Figure 2e).
Finally, we con-
3270; b) F. Stieber, R. Mazitschek, N. Soric, A. Giannis, H.
structed peptide microarrays with the L-tethered strep tag
and 21 of its analogues. The peptide microarrays, after
probing with Cy3-streptavidin, showed that streptavidin
only bound to the strep tag (Figure 2 f). This is consistent
with previous results showing that the amino acid sequence
Waldmann, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4951; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 4757; c) C. Rosenbaum, H. Waldmann, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 5677.
[7] M. L. Lesaicherre, R. Y. Lue, G. Y. Chen, Q. Zhu, S. Q. Yao, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8768.
8] See the Supporting Information for experimental details.
9] I. E. Liener, N. Sharon, I. J. Goldstein, The Lectins: Properties,
Functions, and Applications in Biology and Medicine, Academic
Press, New York, 1986.
10] T. G. M. Schmidt, A. Skerra, Protein Eng. 1993, 6, 109.
11] T. G. M. Schmidt, J. Koepke, R. Frank, A. Skerra, J. Mol. Biol.
1996, 255, 753.
[
13]
[
[
His-Pro-Gln is critical for streptavidin binding.
In conclusion, a new, efficient, and simple method for
fabricating chemical microarrays has been developed. The
technique employs selective immobilization reactions of
hydrazide-linked small molecules with epoxides on the solid
surfaces. The length of the tether between the hydrazide
groups and the active ligands governs protein binding; slides
containing longer tethers exhibit stronger binding of proteins
than those with shorter tethers. The immobilization technique
is suitable for covalently attaching diverse compounds,
including small molecules, carbohydrates, and peptides, to
glass surfaces. The utility of this method is shown by its
application to the fabrication of peptide and small-molecule
microarrays, which have been used to screen for selective
protein binding. We believe that the chemoselective ligation
reaction developed in this effort will find many applications in
the preparation of bioconjugates, such as neoglycopeptides,
peptide–nucleic acid conjugates, and tagged peptides.
[
[
[12] a) W. G. Lewis, L. G. Green, F. Grynszpan, Z. Radi c´ , P. R.
Carlier, P. Taylor, M. G. Finn, K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem.
2002, 114, 1095; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1053; b) Z.
Radi c´ , P. Taylor, J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 4622.
[
13] a) J. J. Devlin, L. C. Panganiban, P. E. Devlin, Science 1990, 249,
404; b) K. S. Lam, S. E. Salmon, E. M. Hersh, V. J. Hruby, W. M.
Kazmierski, R. J. Knapp, Nature 1991, 354, 82.
Received: November 25, 2004
Published online: April 12, 2005
Keywords: chemoselectivity · high-throughput screening ·
.
immobilization · microarrays · protein binding
[
1] For recent reviews, see: a) R. S. Lokey, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2003, 7, 91; b) C. A. MacRae, R. T. Peterson, Chem. Biol. 2003,
10, 901; c) A. C. Bishop, O. Buzko, K. M. Shokat, Trends Cell
Biol. 2001, 11, 167; d) B. R. Stockwell, Trends Biotechnol. 2000,
8, 449.
1
[
2] For recent reviews of DNA microarrays, see: a) S. V. Chittur,
Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2004, 7, 531; b) D. J.
Villeneuve, A. M. Parissenti, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4,
1329; c) W. H. Koch, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 749.
[
3] For recent reviews of protein microarrays, see: a) F. X. Zhou, J.
Bonin, P. F. Predki, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening
2004, 7, 539; b) H. Zhu, M. Snyder, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003,
7, 55; c) D. S. Wilson, S. Nock, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 510;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 494; d) T. Kodadek, Chem. Biol.
2
884
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2881 –2884