COBALT TETRASULFOPHTHALOCYANINATE AS A CATALYST OF THE REDUCTION
2053
−1
104, s
A450
kobs
×
4
3
2
1
0
1.1
0.9
0.7
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0
2
4
6
8
−
τ × 10 , s
[NaNO2], mol/l
3
Fig. 5. Dependence of the rate constant for the reduction
Fig. 4. Kinetic curve of the reduction of nitrite with thioꢀ
of nitrite with thiourea dioxide in the presence of
I
5–
I
I
5–
urea dioxide in the presence of Co (TSPc) ; [TUDO] =
Co (TSPc) on the concentration of nitrite; [TUDO] =
–3
5–
–3
I
5–
–5
1
× 10 mol/l, [NaNO ] = 0.03 mol/l, [Co (TSPc) ] =
1
×
10 mol/l, [Co (TSPc) ] = 4.96
× 10 mol/l, T =
2
–5
4.96 × 10 mol/l, T = 298 K, pH 10.0.
298 K, pH 10.0.
lows that, with dithionite, the rateꢀdetermining stage
of the reduction of nitrite is its interaction with
CoI(TSPc)5–, whereas, with TUDO, this is the reducꢀ
tion of CoII(TSPc)4–. For this reason, we were unable
to determine the kinetic characteristics of the interacꢀ
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research and Romanian Acadꢀ
emy, project no. 07ꢀ03ꢀ91687ꢀRAꢀa.
tion of nitrite with CoI(TSPc)5–
.
REFERENCES
A comparison of the observed rate constant for the
1. S. N. Bryan, Free Rad. Biol. Med. 41, 691 (2006).
interaction of CoI(TSPc)5– with NO2– (this rate conꢀ
2. M. T. Gladwin, A. N. Schechter, D. B. KimꢀShapiro,
et al., Nature Chem. Biol. 1 (6), 308 (2005).
3. S. S. Yoon, R. Coakley, G. W. Lau, et al., J. Clin. Invest.
stant was calculated from the data reported in [7],
10–3 s–1 at
[ ] = 0.03 M, pH 10.0, and 298 K)
NO–2
116, 436 (2006).
9.2
and the kobs value obtained under equal conditions
in this work for the reduction of CoI(TSPc)5– (5.8
10–6 s–1) leads us to conclude that the catalytic reacꢀ
tion involves the CoII CoI cycle. The composition
×
4. A. Cossins and M. Berenbrink, Nature 454 (416)
(2008).
×
5. U. B. Cotta, M. W. Merx, S. Shiva, et al., Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10256 (2008).
6. J. Yi, M. K. Safo, and G. B. RichterꢀAddo, Biochemꢀ
istry 47, 8247 (2008).
7. E. V. Kudrik, S. V. Makarov, A. Zahl, and R. van Eldik,
Inorg. Chem. 42, 618 (2003).
8. E. V. Kudrik, S. V. Makarov, A. Zahl, and R. van Eldik,
of nitrite reduction products favors this conclusion. It
is known that, in alkaline solutions, sulfoxylate slowly
reduces nitrite to nitrogen(I) oxide and N2 [14]. In the
presence of CoII(TSPc)4–, the mechanism of the reacꢀ
tion changes, which results in the formation of
other products. The 15N NMR spectra contain sigꢀ
nals at –283 and –381 ppm. The first signal correꢀ
sponds to coordinated 15NH3, and the second one, to free
Inorg. Chem. 44, 6470 (2005).
9. J. N. Weber and D. H. Busch, Inorg. Chem.
(1965).
4, 469
10. Y.ꢀC. Yang, R. J. Ward, and R. P. Seiders, Inorg. Chem.
24, 1765 (1985).
11. J. Grodkowski, T. Dhanasekaran, P. Neta, et al.,
J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 11332 (2000).
12. W. A. Nevin, W. Liu, M. Melnik, and A. B. P. Lever,
J. Electroanal. Chem. 213, 217 (1986).
13. S. A. Svarovsky, R. H. Simoyu, and S. V. Makarov, Dalꢀ
15NH3 [7]. Ammonia is also the product of nitrite reducꢀ
tion with dithionite in the presence of CoII(TSPc)4–
,
when the reaction involves the CoII CoI catalytic
cycle. It follows that the data of this work are evidence
of the determining influence of the nature of the cataꢀ
lytic cycle on the composition of nitrite reduction
products.
ton Trans. 4, 511 (2000).
14. S. V. Makarov, E. V. Kudrik, R. van Eldik, and
E. V. Naidenko, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 22, 4074
(2002).
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Vol. 83
No. 12
2009