Thermally Induced Rearrangement of R-Pinene
and condensed phase,8-10 but the consecutive reactions of 2
and 3 are rarely investigated.9,11 Deuterium-labeling experiments
performed by Gajewski and co-workers support the hypothesis
that a biradical is responsible for the formation of the primary
pyrolysis products (2, 4, racemic 1) resulting from rearrangement
of optically active 1.10 Recently, studies were published showing
that isomerization of 1 can be carried out in supercritical alcohols
without lost of the initial optical activity of 1 but accompanied
by the formation of dipentene.12-14
Although many results have been published in the literature
concerning the thermal isomerization of 1 already, it seems to
be appropriate to investigate the pyrolysis once more from a
mechanistic and kinetic point of view. Performing pyrolysis
experiments with 1, 2, and 3 under identical conditions allows
for a detailed study of the mechanisms of interconversions of
these compounds. The calculation of activation parameters
according to Arrhenius and Eyring on the basis of kinetic
pyrolyses forces the understanding of the transition states the
reactions pass through. Performing the pyrolysis experiments
in a flow system at ambient pressure using nitrogen as diluting
agent and carrier gas allows for calculation of rate constants
apart from the falloff region.
FIGURE 1. Yield of pyrolysis products of R-pinene pyrolysis and
content of remaining R-pinene (1) depending on reaction temperature
(T). 2, ocimene; 3, alloocimene; 4, limonene; cp, consecutive products.
15 µL starting material; carrier gas, N2; flow rate, 1.0 L min-1; τ,
0.51-0.71 s.
within the temperature range of 350-500 °C (Figure 1).
Therefore, it can be concluded that the reaction pathways starting
from biradical intermediate sketched in Scheme 1 are not
affected by changes in reaction temperature, which is according
to Carpenter not atypical for reactions passing through a joint
transition state or reaction intermediate.15 Subjecting limonene
(4) to pyrolysis studies at temperatures higher than 550 °C
yielded aromatized products.16,17
The influence of reaction temperature on the enantiomeric
ratio of both 1 and 4 was subject of these studies also. Pyrolysis
experiments with optically pure (1S,5S)-(-)-1 and (1R,5R)-(+)-1
were conducted, whereby the initial enantiomeric excess (ee)
values were 80% and 95%, respectively. Temperature plots of
the corresponding yields of both enantiomers of 1 for pyrolysis
of either (-)-1 and (+)-1 are pictured in Figure 2a and b,
respectively, clearly indicating that pyrolyses at elevated tem-
peratures lead to a racemization of the starting materials.
Contrary to previous studies on the loss of optical activity of 1
while heating,2 a complete racemization was not observed in
both cases, because of the fact that complete conversion was
reached first (425 °C). Additionally, the enantiomeric ratio of
optically active pyrolysis product 4 was calculated based on
GC runs using the same ꢀ-cyclodextrine column as used for
the determination of relative enantiomeric yields in the case of
1. Results shown in Figure 2 for the pyrolysis of both
enantiomers of 1 reveal that in both cases a racemic mixture of
(-)-4 and (+)-4 was formed.
Results and Discussion
Pyrolysis of r-Pinene. In order to unravel the complex
product mixture resulting from thermal rearrangement of
R-pinene (1), flow-type pyrolysis experiments at ambient
pressure were conducted with 1 and its main isomerization
products ocimene (2) and alloocimene (3). Comparative chro-
matograms for these experiments are given in Supporting
Information. The plot of conversion of 1 and of the yields of
pyrolysis products versus pyrolysis temperature (T) is depicted
in Figure 1. With respect to the amounts of products initially
formed from 1 (2, 4) significant differences were found. Whereas
4 is formed with a selectivity of approximately 45%, the yield
of the acyclic primary pyrolysis product 2 does not exceed 2%,
pointing out that 2 is a reactive molecule that rapidly rearranges
to 3. At a pyrolysis temperature of 412 °C the yield of 3 passes
through a maximum and further increase of temperature gives
rise to the formation of consecutive products (cp, e.g. py-
ronene).10 Decomposition and aromatization products of py-
ronenes constitute the main fraction resulting from experiments
at temperatures higher than 525 °C. Interestingly, the ratio of
primarily formed products 4 and 2 (including consecutive
reaction products such as 3 or cp) practically remains constant
Pyrolysis of Ocimene. Pyrolysis experiments with a mixture
of 3Z- (2a) and 3E-ocimene (2b; Chart 1) were conducted to
unravel the products formed from their thermal treatment. GC
analyses showed that the ratio of the two stereoisomers of 2
was approximately 0.5 in favor of 2b. The same results were
found in the 1H NMR spectrum of the mixture. Structures were
confirmed by one-dimensional NOESY experiments explained
in Supporting Information. Explorative pyrolyses investigating
the temperature dependency of the conversion of 2 reveal
differences in the thermal behavior of 2a and 2b pictured in
Figure 3. Whereas the Z-isomer (2a) is completely converted
at a pyrolysis temperature of 375 °C, 2b is thermally stable up
to 525 °C, thus indicating that pyrolysis of 1 mainly yields 2a.
(3) (a) Goldblatt, L. A.; Palkin, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 3517–3522.
(b) Savich, T. R.; Goldblatt, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67, 2027–2031.
(4) Fuguitt, R. E.; Hawkins, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67, 242–245.
(5) Hawkins, J. E.; Hunt, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 5379–5381.
(6) Burwell, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 4461–4462.
(7) Hawkins, J. E.; Burris, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 1507–1510.
(8) (a) Fuguitt, R. E.; Hawkins, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 319–322.
(b) Hunt, H. G.; Hawkins, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 5618–5620. (c)
Hawkins, J. E.; Vogh, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1953, 57, 902–905.
(9) Riistama, K.; Harva, O. Finn. Chem. Lett. 1974, 4, 132–138.
(10) (a) Gajewski, J. J.; Kuchuk, I.; Hawkins, C. M.; Stine, R. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 6943–6950. (b) Gajewski, J. J.; Hawkins, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 838–839.
(11) Sasaki, T.; Eguchi, S.; Yamada, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 99–
103.
(12) Anikeev, V. I.; Yermakova, A.; Chibiryaev, A. M.; Kozhevnikov, I. V.;
Mikenin, P. E. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 81, 711–716.
(13) Chibiryaev, A. M.; Yermakova, A.; Kozhevnikov, I. V.; Sal’nikova,
O. I.; Anikeev, V. I. Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 2007, 56, 1234–1238.
(14) Yermakova, A.; Chibiryaev, A. M.; Kozhevnikov, I. V.; Anikeev, V. I.
Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 2414–2421.
(15) Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5730–5732.
(16) Stolle, A.; Brauns, C.; Nu¨chter, M.; Ondruschka, B.; Bonrath, W.;
Findeisen, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3317–3325.
(17) Pines, H.; Ryer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4370–4375.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 21, 2008 8229