Lin et al.
FULL PAPER
was synthesized as follows: 1-naphthaldehyde (1 mmol),
3,4,5-tris(hexadecyloxy)benzohydrazide (1 mmol) and
acetic acid (0.1 mL, as a catalyst) were added to ethanol
(20 mL), then the reaction mixture was stirred under
refluxed conditions for 24 h. After removing the solvent,
the precipitate of sensor L was yielded. Recrystalliza-
tion with CHCl3C2H5OH afforded solid of sensor L.
Characterization of sensor L Yield: 75%, m.p.
Results and Discussion
The synthesis procedure of L is shown in Scheme
S1 in SI. The selective recognition of the target ion from
competitive systems is an essential parameter for the
practical application of chemosensors. To investigate the
ability of recognition of the sensor L for Ag+, the fluo-
rescent spectral changes were investigated upon addi-
+
+
tion of 50 μL various metal perchlorates (Mg2 , Ca2 ,
1
89-91 ℃; H NMR (Figure S1) (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ:
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Cr3 , Fe3 , Co2 , Ni2 , Cu2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Hg2 , Pb2 )
and Al(NO3)3 2×10−3 mol/L in aqueous solution to
ethanol solutions of L (2.0×10−5 mol/L), respectively.
As shown in Figure 1 and Figure S5, no significant
spectral changes were observed in the fluorescence
spectra except Ag+, the experimental results suggest
that L shows a notable selectivity to Ag+. Moreover, to
investigate the ability of recognition of the sensor L for
Ag + in different solvent, the fluorescent spectral
changes were investigated upon addition of various
9.77 (s, 1H, NH), 9.04 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.65 (d, J=6.4
Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.99 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.87 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 2H,
ArH), 7.51-7.45 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.11 (s, 2H, ArH), 3.98
(t, J = 8 Hz, 6H, OCH2), 1.77 (t, J = 8 Hz, 6H,
OCH2CH2CH2), 1.43-1.25 (m, 72H, CH2), 0.88 (t,
J=6 Hz, 9H, CH3); 13C NMR (Figure S2) (CDCl3, 600
MHz) δ: 166.95, 152.78, 142.26, 141.34, 107.87, 133.80,
131.10, 130.71, 129.06, 128.82, 127.74, 127.37, 127.00,
126.19, 125.26, 124.60, 107.87, 105.91, 105.12, 73.56,
73.45, 69.39, 69.11, 68.92, 31.93, 30.34, 30.23, 29.73,
29.67, 29.38, 29.28, 29.17, 26.09, 22.70, 14.13; IR
(Figure S3) (KBr) v: 3450 (N-H), 1717 (C=O), 1649
(C = N) cm−1; MS-ESI (Figure S4) calcd for
C66H111N2O4 [L+H]+: 995.8544; found 995.8096.
+
+
+
+
+
+
metal perchlorates (Mg2 , Ca2 , Cr3 , Fe3 , Co2 , Ni2 ,
+
+
+
+
+
Cu2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Hg2 , Pb2 ) and Al(NO3)3 to ethanol-
H2O (Figure S6) solutions of L and DMSO (Figure S7)
respectively. As shown in Figure S6 and Figure S7, no
significant spectral changes were observed in the fluo-
rescence spectra, the experimental results suggest that L
shows a notable selectivity to Ag+ only in ethanol sol-
vent.
Scheme 1 The synthetic route to sensor L
To obtain insight into the binding properties of L
toward Ag+, a fluorescence titration experiment was
conducted. Figure 2 shows the fluorescence spectra of
sensor L in the presence of different amounts of Ag+ in
ethanol. Free sensor L shows rather weak emission at
448 nm. However, after addition of silver ions, the
emission band at 448 nm emerged and its intensity in-
creased gradually. Moreover, as shown in the Figure S8,
the fluorescence intensity of L at 448 nm increases li-
nearly with the concentration of Ag+, where a nearly
linear plot of I485nm versus the amounts of Ag+ in the
range of 0-2.0 equiv. was displayed (linear depend-
ency coefficient R=0.994). The detection limit of silver
ions assay can reach 1.2×10−7 mol/L,[33] which sug-
gests that L shows a notable sensitivity to silver ions.
To investigate the ability of anti-interference of the
sensor L for Ag+, the experiment of anti-interference of
sensor L solution in the presence of different metal ions
was carried out and the results are shown in Figure 3. It
O
O
O
O
C
16H33Br
K2CO3 , KI, acetone, reflux 72 h
C
16H33
O
OC16H33
OC16H33
HO
OH
OH
H
O
N
NH2
.
NH2NH2 H2O (85%)
C2H5OH, reflux 24 h
C16H33
O
OC16H33
OC16H33
O
H
O
N
NH2
+
+
should be mentioned that the addition of Mg2 , Ca2 ,
C2H5OH, reflux 24 h
glacial acetic acid
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Al3 , Cr3 , Fe3 , Co2 , Ni2 , Cu2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Hg2
C16H33
O
OC16H33
+
and Pb2 enhanced slightly the fluorescence of L in the
presence of Ag+, which did not interfere the analysis of
Ag+. The results indicated that L can be used as a po-
tential sensor for Ag+ with high selectivity in the pres-
ence of other competitive species. Several factors might
cooperate to achieve the unique selectivity and high
sensitivity of the sensor L for the Ag+ detection, such
as the suitable radius of Ag+, the structural rigidity and
the binding ability of the sensor L with Ag+.
OC16H33
OC16H33
OC16H33
OC16H33
N
NH
O
L
1256
© 2014 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chin. J. Chem. 2014, 32, 1255—1258