5016
J. Y. Lee et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5014–5017
Table 1. Biological data for selected compounds
Compound
Channel blocking effect
(% inhibition)a,b
Growth inhibition of cancer cell: GI50 (lM)c
T-type (a1G
)
N-type (a1B
)
A-549d
HCT-15e
KBf
3.77 0.07
>200
SK-MEL-2g
SKOV3h
5 (KYS05044)
7a (KYS05075)
7b (KYS05074)
8 (KYS05040)
9a (KYS05071)
9b (KYS05070)
9c (KYS05041)
9d ((KYS05064)
Cisplatin
82.5 0.7
34.4 1.4
59.3 1.9
43.5 4.5
62.7 2.3
81.3 0.8
89.9 1.3
91.3 0.6
3.9 2.1
No blocking
27.6 0.5
9.3 0.5
3.39 0.11
>200
3.64 0.24
>200
3.32 0.20
50.19 2.45
42.48 0.00
30.73 5.97
31.36 1.53
24.21 5.08
2.70 0.21
3.52 0.18
4.40 1.40
3.24 0.31
>200
95.10 19.97
36.60 1.19
66.10 19.10
39.16 6.97
3.06 0.10
23.03 0.75
0.67 0.67
74.16 9.63
33.86 3.86
38.62 3.13
33.89 2.75
2.80 0.28
25.67 8.61
2.80 1.00
108.14 24.43
37.08 0.82
41.63 7.41
33.83 0.56
3.11 0.25
22.28 1.80
1.50 1.20
77.84 12.62
39.32 1.28
46.48 5.29
33.44 0.00
2.93 0.00
22.78 5.15
1.80 0.67
8.9 1.8
No blocking
8.9 1.8
14.1 2.1
No blocking
NDi
a % Inhibition on HEX293 cell at 10 lM.
b Value was determined from dose–response curve and obtained from three independent experiments.
c GI50 value was determined from dose–response curve and obtained from three independent experiments.
d Human lung carcinoma (A-549).
e Human colon cancer (HCT-15).
f Human epidermoid carcinoma (KB).
g Human malignant melanoma (SK-MEL-2).
h Human ovarian cancer (SKOV3).
i ND, not determined.
crosslinking DNA in several different ways, making it
impossible for rapidly dividing cells to duplicate their
DNA for mitosis. In general, all compounds showed
the similar correlation between cell growth inhibitory
activity and T-type channel blocking effect, even though
it is non-linear. That is, compound 7a showing weak
activity against T-type channel produced weak activity
against cancer cells. Compounds 5 and 9c showing
strong potency against T-type channel exhibited strong
activity against cancer cells. All compounds also exhib-
ited the similar growth inhibitory activities against five
cancer cells except for compounds 7a, 7b, and 9d. Inter-
estingly, compound 9d, which is the most active com-
pound (91.3 0.6%) against T-type channel, exhibited
less activity than compounds 5 and 9c except for
SKMEL2 cell line. This result could be explained by
comparing IC50 values of compounds 5, 9c, and 9d,
which are 0.56 0.10, 0.17 0.08, and 0.96 0.22 lM,
respectively (the data not inserted in Table 1). With re-
spect to IC50 value, therefore, the most active compound
9c exhibited the meaningful inhibition of cancer cell’s
growth compared to Cisplatin, which is our reference
compound.
preliminary data. This result is obviously found to
coincide with the previous works by other research
groups and also endows T-type calcium channel
blocker with the possibility as another anti-cancer
agent.15,16 However, more work is needed in order
to understand the calcium influx and cell proliferation
via T-type calcium channel. Encouraged by these
results, therefore, the synthesis and biological evalua-
tion of a variety of compounds are in progress for
providing the direct linkage and will be announced
in the future.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by Vision 21 Program from
Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
References and notes
1. Berridge, M. J.; Lipp, P.; Bootman, M. D. Nat. Rev. Mol.
Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 11.
2. Berridge, M. J.; Bootman, M. D.; Roderick, H. L. Nat.
Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517.
As shown in Table 1, it seems that the blocking of N-
type channel has no effect on the anti-cancer activity.
That is, the sum of T-type and N-type % inhibition
did not contribute to increase the growth inhibition
activity, when considered the data of two pairs of com-
pounds such as 7a and 8, and 7b and 9a. For the exact
relationship between N-type channel blocking and
anti-cancer activity, however, compounds showing the
selectivity for N-type channel should be synthesized
and evaluated for anti-cancer activity.
3. Whitfield, J. F.; Boynton, A. L.; MacManus, J. P.; Rixon,
R. H.; Sikorska, M.; Tsang, B.; Walker, P. R.; Swierenga,
S. H. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1980, 339, 216.
4. Moolenaar, F.; Yska, J. P.; Visser, J.; Meijer, D. K. Eur. J.
Clin. Pharmacol. 1985, 29, 119.
5. Whitaker, M.; Patel, R. Development 1990, 108, 525.
6. Lu, K. P.; Means, A. R. Endocr. Rev. 1993, 14, 40.
7. Clapham, D. E. Cell 1995, 80, 259.
8. Gray, L. S.; Perez-Reyes, E.; Gamorra, J. C.; Haverstick,
D. M.; Shattock, M.; McLatchie, L.; Harper, J.; Brooks,
G.; Heady, T.; Macdonald, T. L. Cell Calcium 2004, 36,
489.
In conclusion, we have provided the additional
evidence for the relationship between the inhibition
of calcium influx and anti-cancer activity via T-type
calcium channel blocking even though it is only
9. McCalmont, W. F.; Heady, T. N.; Patterson, J. R.;
Lindenmuth, M. A.; Haverstick, D. M.; Gray, L. S.;
Macdonald, T. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14,
3691.