2176
D. Ekeberg, S. Morgenlie / Carbohydrate Research 339 (2004) 2171–2176
and ionised by electron ionisation at 70eV. The ion
source temperature was 200ꢁC. A Carlo Erba high res-
olution gas chromatograph (HRGC) was applied for
the GC–MS combination.
sin was added to fill the solution volume. The mixture
was kept at room temperature for 12min under nitro-
gen, 20% aqueous acetic acid was then added. After fil-
tration, the resin was washed with more acetic acid
solution and finally with water. The combined filtrates
and washings were evaporated, and the residue was trea-
ted with acetone or acetone-d –H SO as described
3
.2. Materials
6
2
4
2
D and L-eythro-2-Pentulose, D-threo-2-pentulose, DL-
0
21
above and the solution subjected to GC or GC–MS.
3
glycero-tetrulose DL-lyxo-, D-arabino-, L-xylo-, and
3
7
7
7
D-ribo-3-hexulose were prepared according to reported
methods.
3.6. Alkali catalysed reaction of DL-glycero-tetrulose with
glycolaldehyde
3
.3. GC–MS analysis
To DL-glycero-tetrulose (15mg) in water (5mL) were
added a solution of glycolaldehyde (12mg) in water
(3mL) and then 0.04M NaOH solution (8mL) with or
without SrCl Æ6H O (8.5g). After 50min under nitrogen
The sugars were identified by GC–MS of their isopropy-
,13,14,19
lidene derivatives on the basis of previous work.
7
2
2
The relative proportions of the hexuloses in the product
mixtures was calculated from the peak areas of the
derivatives. For the hexuloses giving more than one
derivative, the molar response of the main acetal was
stipulated from the proportion formed of this acetal
on acetonation of the hexulose.
at room temperature, the solution without SrCl was
2
+
neutralised with Dowex 50 W (H ) resin, filtered and
evaporated under reduced pressure. The solution with
À
SrCl was deionised with IRA 400 (HCO ) and Dowex
2
3
+
50 W (H ) resins, filtered and evaporated. The residues
were treated with acetone––H SO as described above
and subjected to GC and GC–MS.
2
4
3
.4. Reaction of 2-pentuloses with formaldehyde
To the 2-pentulose (20mg) in water (4.5mL) were added
5% formaldehyde solution (0.5mL) and 0.1M NaOH
5mL). The solution was flushed with nitrogen and kept
References
3
(
1. Decker, P.; Schweer, H. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 107, 1–6.
2. Morgenlie, S. Acta. Chem. Scand. B 1982, 36, 725–727.
. Morgenlie, S. Acta. Chem. Scand. B 1987, 41, 745–748.
. Mizuno, T.; Weiss, A. H. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
at room temperature for 30min under nitrogen. After
+
neutralisation with Dowex 50 W (H ) ion exchange re-
3
4
sin, filtering of the solution and evaporation of the sol-
vent under reduced pressure, the residue was dissolved
+
in MeOH. Dowex 50 W (H ) was added to the solution
1
974, 29, 173–227.
5
6
. Angyal, S. J.; James, K. Chem. Commun. 1970, 320–321.
. Angyal, S. J.; Evans, M. E. Aust. J. Chem. 1972, 25,
1495–1512.
. Ekeberg, D.; Morgenlie, S.; Stenstrøm, Y. Carbohydr. Res.
001, 335, 141–146.
. Kemp, M. B. Biochem. J. 1974, 139, 129–134.
. Strøm, T.; Ferenci, T.; Quayle, J. R. Biochem. J. 1974, 144,
4
10. Colby, J.; Zatman, L. J. Biochem. J. 1975, 148, 513–520.
and the mixture was heated at reflux temperature under
stirring for 2h to remove excess formaldehyde as its di-
methyl acetal, which was continuously distilled off dur-
ing the reaction period together with about one third
of the MeOH. After cooling, the solution was filtered
and the solvent evaporated. The residue was heated in
7
2
8
9
65–476.
1
1. Brockamp, H.-P.; Steigel, A.; Kula, M.-R. Liebigs. Ann.
Chem., 1993, 621–624.
0
methyl glycosides. The solution was then cooled, neu-
tralised with Amberlite IRA 400 (HCO3 ) ion exchange
.1M H SO (10mL) at 65ꢁC for 2h to hydrolyse
2
4
12. Morgenlie, S. Acta. Chem. Scand. B 1988, 42, 546–549.
13. Morgenlie, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1975, 41, 285–289.
14. Morgenlie, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 80, 215–222.
À
resin, filtered and the solvent was evaporated. The resi-
due was stirred for 90min with 2% H SO in acetone or
acetone-d6 (5mL). After neutralisation with solid
15. DeJongh, D. C.; Biemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86,
7–74.
6. Brady, R. F., Jr. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1971,
6, 197–278.
2
4
6
1
1
NaHCO and filtration of the solution, it was subjected
3
2
to GC and GC–MS.
7. Gutsche, C. D.; Redmore, D.; Buriks, R. S.; Nowotny, K.;
Grassner, H.; Armbruster, C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967,
89, 1235–1245.
3
.5. Anion exchange resin catalysed reaction of
1
1
2
8. Morgenlie, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 107, 137–141.
9. Morgenlie, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 132, 330–334.
0. Ekeberg, D.; Morgenlie, S.; Stenstrøm, Y. Carbohydr. Res.
DL-glycero-tetrulose with glycolaldehyde
To DL-glycero-tetrulose (10mg) in water (2mL) was
added a solution of glycolaldehyde (8mg) in water
2
002, 337, 779–786.
2
1. Hough, L.; Theobald, R. S. Methods Carbohydr. Chem.
1962, 1, 94–98.
(
2mL). Enough freshly regenerated anion exchange re-