Jinbang Wang et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis 36 (2015) 1392–1402
1393
cessful commercial process [2–4]. Furthermore, a wide range of
different zeolites have been investigated as catalysts for the
MTH reaction during the past decades [2,3,5], including ZSM-5
and SAPO-34, which are believed to be the most effective cata-
lysts for this process. These catalysts have also been applied to
a variety of commercial processes, including methanol-to-olefin
determine the effects of the acidic strength of the catalyst on
MTO reactions over AFI and SAPO zeolite catalysts. The results
showed that the use of a catalyst with a low acidic strength
promoted the conversion of methanol via an alkene-mediated
mechanism. Taken together, these results show that it is of
critical importance to understand the detailed role played by
the acidic properties of these catalysts in the formation of al-
kenes. Furthermore, the performance characteristics of these
catalysts could be optimized by tuning their acidic properties,
representing an alternative approach to the optimization of
these processes, which should therefore be explored in greater
detail.
(MTO) [4,6], methanol-to-propene (MTP) [7] and metha-
nol-to-gasoline (MTG) [8–10] processes.
Considerable research efforts have also been devoted to
developing a deeper understanding of the mechanism of the
MTH reaction. The results of previous investigations have
shown that the detailed mechanism of the MTH reaction is very
complicated and strongly dependent on the topology of the
zeolite catalyst. For example, SAPO-34, which consists of large
supercages and small 8-ring windows, is currently regarded as
the best catalyst for MTO reactions [4,11]. It is noteworthy that
the high level of selectivity exhibited by this catalyst for ethene
and propene has been attributed to the hydrocarbon pool
mechanism [12–14]. Furthermore, polymethylbenzene and
polymethylcyclopentadiene, as well as their protonated ana-
logues, have been reported to be important reactive intermedi-
ates for the production of alkenes [15–22]. The formation of
these bulky intermediates was not only observed over SAPO-34
but was also detected in several other zeolites with wide or
intersectional channels, such as Hβ [23], ZSM-5 [20], SSZ-13
In this study, we have used two one-dimensional 10-ring
zeolites, HZSM-22 (TON, 0.46 × 0.57 nm) and SAPO-11 (AEL,
0.4 × 0.65 nm), to elucidate the role of their acidic strength on
the MTH reaction and their deactivation mechanism.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
The K-ZSM-22 and SAPO-11 catalysts were supplied by
Group DNL0802 of the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics,
Dalian, China. After being calcined at 600 °C for 10 h to remove
the organic template, K-ZSM-22 was converted to NH
4
-ZSM-22
[
[
19] and DNL-6 [24,25]. In a separate study, Svelle et al.
26–28] conducted a series of 12C/ C-methanol labeling ex-
by three ion-exchange processes in a NH NO solution (1
4
3
13
mol/L) at 80 °C for 6 h. The resulting catalyst was then washed
with deionized water, dried over night at 120 °C and calcined at
550 °C for 4 h to give protonated H-ZSM-22. The SAPO-11 sam-
ple was calcined at 550 °C for 4 h to give H-SAPO-11.
periments over the medium pore acidic zeolite ZSM-5 to show
that the generation of ethene occurred via an separated route,
independent of the one responsible for the formation of C
+
3
alkenes. The authors went on to propose a dual-cycle mecha-
nism for this transformation, which consists of an aro-
2.2. Catalyst characterization
matic-based cycle with xylene/triMB as reactive intermediates
+
for the production of ethene and a C
3
alkene-based cycle for
The structural properties of two catalysts were character-
ized using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO X-ray diffraction (XRD)
the formation of propene and higher alkenes. Based on this
mechanistic insight, there have been considerable researches
about whether the conversion of methanol could run in an in-
dependent manner while suppressing the formation of ethene
via an alkene cycle by carefully controlling the topology of the
catalyst [26]. This assumption was recently validated over the
system with Cu K radiation (λ = 0.154059 nm) at 40 kV and 40
α
mA. The chemical compositions of the catalysts were deter-
mined using a Philips Magix-601 X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
spectrometer. The morphological characteristics of the cata-
lysts were measured by field emission scanning electron mi-
croscopy (FE-SEM) on a Hitachi SU8020 system.
one-dimensional 10-ring zeolite, HZSM-22, which produces
+
hydrocarbons rich in C
5
branched alkenes and low in aromat-
The N physisorption isotherms of the samples were meas-
2
ics and ethene [29–32].
ured at –196 °C on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 system. Fresh
samples of the catalysts were degassed under vacuum at 90 °C
for 1 h and then at 350 °C for 3 h before being analyzed. The
surface areas of the samples were calculated using the Brunau-
er-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation, and their micropore volumes
were evaluated using the t-plot method.
The spent catalysts were collected and analyzed by thermo-
gravimetric analysis (TGA) on a Q500 SDT thermogravimetric
analyzer. In a typical measurement, a small sample (10–14 mg)
In addition to their topological characteristics, the acidic
properties of zeolite catalysts can also have a significant impact
on their performances for the conversion of methanol. This
issue was first reported by Yuen et al. [33] over CHA and AFI
catalysts. The results of this study revealed that the acidity of
borosilicate sieves was too low to allow for the conversion of
methanol to hydrocarbons, and that SAPO-34 displayed lower
hydrogen transfer reactivity than SSZ-13. Most recently, Bleken
et al. [34] reported the systematic comparison of SAPO-34 and
SSZ-13 in the MTO reaction. The results showed that the more
acidic SSZ-13 catalyst exhibited higher activity, which leads to a
higher methanol conversion than that of the less acidic
SAPO-34 catalyst under the same operating conditions. West-
gård Erichsen et al. [35] also conducted a comparative study to
of spent catalyst was heated in an Al
2
O crucible from ambient
3
temperature to 900 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a
stream of air at a constant flow rate of 100 ml/min.
The acidity of the catalysts was determined by the temper-
3
ature programmed desorption of ammonia (NH -TPD) on a
Micromeritics AutoChem 2920 system. The samples were