Effect of the Si/Al Ratios of Nanocrystalline HZSM-5 Zeolite
hydrocarbons (C aliphatic and aromatic) species and
Meng et al.
3
+
1
00
98
96
coke.35
HZ-200
For fresh HZSM-5 with lower Si/Al ratios and larger
amounts of strong acid sites, more aromatics are expected
HZ-125
HZ-75
to be produced by aromatization.1
1ꢀ16
Thus, HZ-50 and
HZ-75 exhibit high initial aromatics selectivity (Fig. 5(d))
and low initial C –C olefins selectivity (Figs. 5(a and b)).
9
4
3
4
On the other hand, initial ethylene selectivity increases
with the Si/Al ratio (Fig. 5(c)), indicating that weaker acid
sites are beneficial for the formation of ethylene.
92
HZ-50
800
9
0
The catalyst surface is covered by coke gradually with
TOS, thus inducing the decrease in the number of strong
acid sites. Therefore, the selectivities of C –C olefins
0
200
400
600
Temperature/ºC
2
4
Figure 6. TG curves of HZSM-5 zeolites with different Si/Al ratios
after the duration test of ethanol to propylene catalytic reaction.
increase but the selectivity to aromatics decreases with
TOS. It can be concluded that decreasing the amount
of strong acid sites is beneficial for raising propylene
2
2
4
. CONCLUSIONS
selectivity. As the reaction over HZSM-5 prolongs, more
and more coke is formed and covers the catalyst sur-
face. Accordingly, the number of acid sites with medium
ZSM-5 zeolites with different Si/Al ratios (50, 75,
115, 200) but similar crystal sizes (100 nm) were suc-
cessfully synthesized. These HZSM-5 catalysts had simi-
lar physicochemical properties except for the acidity. The
decreased Si/Al molar ratio of ZSM-5 zeolite led to an
increase in the amounts of the strong acid sites and weak
acid sites. HZSM-5 with different Si/Al molar ratios all
exhibited high activity for ethanol conversion. In partic-
ular, HZSM-5 with a Si/Al ratio of 50 was found to be
the most favorable for the stable production of propylene.
strength, responsible for the formation of propylene and
butylenes,1
1ꢀ16ꢀ22
also decreases with TOS. As a result, the
selectivity to C –C olefins decreases, whereas ethylene
3
4
selectivity keeps increasing.
The Si/Al ratio of HZSM-5 plays an important role in
the time length of the induction period. HZSM-5 samples
of low Si/Al ratios (50, 75) have larger numbers of strong
acid sites, so more coke is needed to cover the strong
acid sites, which makes the induction period longer. On
IP: 178.159.97.125 On: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 19:29:55
Further attempts may be made to modify the catalyst in
order to improve the propylene yield and stability.
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
the contrary, the numbers of strong acid sites on HZSM-5
Delivered by Ingenta
samples with high Si/Al ratios (125, 200) are fewer, so
these strong acid sites can be covered readily by smaller
amounts of coke. Therefore, the induction period is much
shorter for high Si/Al ratio samples. For the same rea-
son, the order of the reduction rate of propylene selectiv-
ity over different HZSM-5 catalysts (HZ-200 > HZ-125 >
HZ-75 > HZ-50) is opposite to that of the time length
of the induction period. Our data indicate that high Si/Al
ratio HZSM-5 zeolites are not suitable for catalytic reac-
tion of ethanol to propylene, which is different from the
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Shanghai Munic-
ipal Education Commission (J51503) and Graduate Inno-
vation Foundation of Shanghai Institute of Technology
(yjscx2010005) for financial support.
References and Notes
1. F. Kapteijn, J. Rodriguez-Mirasol, and J. A. Moulijn, Appl. Catal. B
9, 25 (1996).
2. N. Rahimi and R. Karimzadeh, Appl. Catal. A 398, 1 (2011).
3
7
trend seen in the methanol to propylene process.
3. B. Kaur and R. Srivastava, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14, 6539 (2014).
4. L. T. Hoai Nam, T. Q. Vinh, N. T. Thanh Loan, N. T. Nhiem, N. T.
Thu Trang, N. M. Tan, and J. Radnik, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.
The above discussion suggests that the catalytic proper-
ties of HZSM-5 catalysts can be greatly affected by coke
deposition. Additionally, since the samples are black in
1
5, 7275 (2015).
. X. J. Cheng, X. S. Wang, and H. Y. Long, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
19, 171 (2009).
6. M. Firoozi, M. Baghalha, and M. Asadi, Catal. Commun. 10, 1582
2009).
. N. Taufiqurrahmi, A. R. Mohamed, and S. Bhatia, J. Nanopart. Res.
3, 3177 (2011).
5
color after the reaction, coke deposition might be the main
1
reason for catalyst deactivation.2
0ꢀ38
TG was used to reveal
(
the contents of coke over the spent catalysts. Figure 6
shows that, the relative amount of carbonaceous deposits
for the used HZ-50 collected after 96 h on stream is 8.50%,
that for the used HZ-75 collected after 57 h on stream is
7
1
8
9
. R. Selvin, H. L. Hsu, and T. M. Her, Catal. Commun. 10, 169 (2008).
. J. Rass-Hansen, H. Falsig, B. Jørgensen, and C. H. Christensen,
J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 82, 329 (2007).
3
.50%, that for the used HZ-125 collected after 17 h on
1
1
1
0. K. Murata, M. Inaba, and I. Takahara, J. Jap. Petro. Inst. 51, 234
2008).
1. Z. X. Song, A. Takahashi, N. Mimura, and T. Fujitani, Catal. Lett.
31, 364 (2009).
2. Z. X. Song, A. Takahashi, I. Nakamura, and T. Fujitani, Appl.
Catal. A 384, 201 (2010).
stream is 0.64%, and that for the used HZ-200 collected
after 11 h on stream is 0.40%. With more coke deposits
on it, HZ-50 still has higher propylene selectivity than the
other catalysts (Fig. 5(a)), indicating that HZ-50 has better
ability to tolerate the coke deposits.
(
1
3784
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 17, 3779–3785, 2017