Journal of Natural Products
Article
Alkaline Hydrolisis of Resin Glycoside Fraction. A solution of
μBondapak NH column (3.9 × 300 mm; 10 μm); elution, CH CN−
2
2
3
fractions III and IV (10 mg, each) in 5% KOH−H O (2 mL) was
H O (4:1); flow rate 1 mL/min. Simonic acid B was identified by
2
refluxed at 95 °C for 2 h. The reaction mixture was acidified to pH 4.0
coelution with an authentic sample (t 14.6 min) previously isolated
R
1
4d
and extracted with CHCl (10 mL). The organic layer was washed
from I. pes-caprae.
3
with H O, dried over anhydrous Na SO , evaporated under reduced
2
2
4
pressure, and directly analyzed by GC-MS and comparison of their
spectra and retention times with those of authentic samples. All
analytical standards were purchased with a purity of >98%: 2-
methylpropanoic acid (240168, Aldrich); 2-methylbutanoic acid
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
* Supporting Information
7
S
Spectra for batatins VIII−XI (1−4): negative FABMS, negative
1
13
(
(
193070, Aldrich); cinnamic acid (C80857, Sigma); n-decanoic acid
C1875, Sigma); n-dodecanoic acid (L4250, Sigma). Four peaks were
ESIMS, H and C NMR, COSY, TOCSY, HSQC, HMBC.
detected for fraction III: 2-methylpropanoic acid (t 4.0 min), m/z
R
+
[
(
M] 88 (10), 73 (27), 60 (3), 55 (5), 45 (7), 43 (100), 41 (40), 39
10), 29 (6), 27 (24); 2-methylbutanoic acid (t 7 min), m/z [M]
+
R
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
1
1
02 (3), 87 (33), 74 (100), 57 (50), 41 (28), 39 (8); cinnamic acid (tR
6.5 min), m/z [M] 148 (100), 147 (96), 131 (25), 103 (40), 102
+
Corresponding Author
(
20), 77 (25), 74 (8), 51 (20), 50 (8), 39 (5), 38 (4); and n-
+
dodecanoic acid (t 18 min), m/z [M] 200 (15), 183 (2), 171 (18),
R
1
57 (40), 143 (20), 129 (48), 115 (20), 101 (15), 85 (33), 73 (100),
Notes
6
0 (80), 57 (30), 55 (47), 43 (30). Three peaks were detected for
+
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
fraction IV: 2-methylbutanoic acid (t 7.2 min), m/z [M] 102 (3), 87
R
(
33), 74 (100), 57 (50), 41 (28), 39 (8); n-decanoic acid (t 14.6
R
+
min), m/z [M] 172 (2), 155 (3), 143 (12), 129 (62), 115 (15), 112
12), 87 (20), 73 (100), 60 (90), 57 (40), 55 (45), 43 (30), 41 (35),
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
(
3
(
(
This research was supported by Direccion
́
General de Asuntos
+
9 (6); and n-dodecanoic acid (t 17.8 min), m/z [M] 200 (15), 183
R
del Personal Academ
Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (220535). D.R.-R. received
́
ico, UNAM (IN212813), and Consejo
2), 171 (18), 157 (40), 143 (10), 129 (48), 115 (20), 101 (15), 85
33), 73 (100), 60 (80), 57 (30), 55 (47), 43 (30).
Esterification of the liberated carboxylic acids was performed as
́
graduate scholarships from CONACyT. Thanks are due to G.
Duarte (USAI, Facultad de Quimica, UNAM) for the recording
́
follows: a solution of benzyl alcohol (10.5 mg) in CH Cl (1 mL),
2
2
containing dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (3 mg) and 4-dimethylaminopyr-
of mass spectra and to Dr. M. Fragoso-Serrano (Departamento
1
9
idine (1 mg), was added to the mixture of carboxylic acids. The
reaction was stirred for 12 h at room temperature and filtered, and the
solvent evaporated. The crude mixture was purified by HPLC on a
normal-phase column (μPorasil, 10 μm, 3.9 × 300 mm; Waters) using
n-hexane−EtOAc (99:1, flow rate 0.7 mL/min): The physical and
́
de Farmacia, Facultad de Quimica, UNAM) for HPLC
technical assistance.
REFERENCES
1) Pereda-Miranda, R.; Rosas-Ramírez, D.; Castan
■
(
̃
eda-Gom
́
ez, J.
spectroscopic constants registered for the eluate with t 8.39 min were
R
1
9,20
Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products; Kinghorn, A. D.,
Falk, H., Kobayashi, J., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2010; Vol. 92,
Chapter 2, pp 77−152.
identical in all aspects to those previously reported
+)-benzyl α-methylbutyrate: oil, [α] +10.
for (S)-
(
D
The n-butanol-soluble residue (6 mg) extracted from the
saponification aqueous phase was subjected to preparative HPLC on
(
2) Eich, E. Solanaceae and Convolvulaceae: Secondary Metabolites.
Biosynthesis, Chemotaxonomy, Biological and Economic Significance;
Springer: Heidelberg, 2008; p 532.
a Waters μBondapak NH column (7.8 × 300 mm; 10 μm). The
2
elution was isocratic with CH CN−H O (4:1), using a flow rate of 1
3
2
(
3) Pereda-Miranda, R.; Hernan
3145−3154.
(4) Rosas-Ramírez, D.; Escalante-San
Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 773−780.
(5) (a) Escalante-Sanchez, E.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2007,
́
dez-Carlos, B. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
mL/min and a sample injection of 500 μL (5 mg/mL). This procedure
yielded the same glycosidic acid for the two fractions, which was
identified as simonic acid B by comparison of its physical constants
́
chez, E.; Pereda-Miranda, R.
1
3,14
and NMR data with published values.
Both residues were
methylated with CH N to yield 9.5 mg of a white powder: mp
́
2
2
1
13−115 °C; [α] −83 (c 1.0, MeOH) HRFABMS m/z 1015.5322
70, 1029−1034. (b) Rosas-Ramírez, D.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9488−9494.
D
−
[
M − H] (calcd for C H O requires 1015.5325). The glycosidic
47
83 23
acid methyl ester was further acetylated (Ac O−pyridine, 2:1) to give a
(6) (a) Castan
74, 1148−1153. (b) Castan
Jacobo, N.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 64−71.
(7) Pereda-Miranda, R.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Escalante-Sanchez, E.;
Hernandez-Carlos, B.; Linares, E.; Bye, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69,
1460−1466.
(8) (a) Pereda-Miranda, R.; Kaatz, G. W.; Gibbons, S. J. Nat. Prod.
2006, 69, 406−409. (b) Cherigo, L.; Pereda-Miranda, R.; Fragoso-
Serrano, M.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Kaatz, G. W.; Gibbons, S. J. Nat.
Prod. 2008, 71, 1037−1045. (c) Cherigo, L.; Pereda-Miranda, R.;
̃
eda-Gom
́
ez, J.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2011,
2
residue (9.3 mg), which was purified on RP-18 HPLC (7 μm, 19 ×
̃
eda-Gomez, J.; Figueroa-Gonzalez, G.;
́
́
3
00 mm; CH CN−MeOH, 4:1; flow rate 8 mL/min). Eluates across
3
the peak with tR values of 10.8 min afforded the peracetylated
derivative of simonic acid B methyl ester, which was identified by
coelution with an authentic sample and comparison of its physical
́
́
14c
constants and NMR data with published values: mp 81−85 °C;
13
[
(
1
(
α]D −37 (c 0.2, MeOH); C NMR (pyridine-d , 125 MHz) 99.8
́
5
CH, Fuc-1), 99.7 (CH, Rha‴-1), 99.2 (CH, Rha″-1), 99.1 (CH, Rha-
), 97.4 (CH, Rha′-1), 13.9 (CH , Jla-16), 33.9 (CH CO ), 50.8
́
3
2
2
OCH ), 78.0 (CH, Jla-11), 173.6 (C, Jla-1).
Gibbons, S. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 222−227. (d) Escobedo-
Martínez, C.; Cruz-Morales, S.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Rahman, M.
M.; Gibbons, S.; Pereda-Miranda, R. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1796−
1801.
3
Alkaline Hydrolisis of 1−4. Each individual compound 1−4 (3
mg) was submitted to an alkaline hydrolysis following the same
procedures described above. The organic layer from extraction was
directly analyzed by GC-MS. For compound 1, two peaks were
(9) (a) Corona-Castan
̃
eda, B.; Pereda-Miranda, R. Planta Med. 2012,
detected, 2-methylpropanoic acid (t 4.0 min) and n-dodecanoic acid
78, 128−131. (b) Corona-Castan
̃
eda, B.; Cherigo, L.; Fragoso-Serrano,
́
R
(
t 17.8 min); for 2, the peaks for 2-methylbutanoic acid (t 7 min)
M.; Gibbons, S.; Pereda-Miranda, R. Phytochemistry 2013, 95, 277−
R
R
and cinnamic acid (t 16.5 min) were identified; and compounds 3
283.
R
and 4 afforded methylbutanoic acid (t 7.2 min) as well as n-decanoic
(10) (a) Figueroa-Gonzal
Dehesa, A.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 93−97.
(b) Cruz Morales, S.; Castaneda-Gomez, J.; Figueroa-Gonzalez, G.;
́
ez, G.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Zentella-
R
acid (t 14.6 min) and n-dodecanoic acid (t 17.8 min), respectively.
R
R
The aqueous phases were individually dried and analyzed by HPLC:
̃
́
́
G
J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX