2250
S. Chandrasekhar, P. Karri / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 2249–2251
Table 1. Yields of cinnamic acid (3) produced from the following
O
OAc
OAc
reactants under the conditions indicated:a,b,c,d Ac2O (1), PhCHO (2),
PhCH(OAc)2 (4)b
+ Ac2O
Ph
Ph
H
O
1
2
4
Entry Reactants
Conditions
% Yield of 3
1a
2
1+2+KOAc
1+4+KOAc
2+4+KOAc
4+KOAc+DMF
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
60
30
75
70
O
O
O
O
O
Ph
O
Ph
3
O
4c
5e
H
OAc
IV
4+t-BuOK+THF Room temperature 70
III
a Entry 1 refers to the classical Perkin reaction; the base and the solvent
employed in the other cases are indicated with the reactants. All the
above reactions were carried out for the same period of time (5 h).
b Diacetate 4 was prepared in 80% yield as reported,8 from 1, 2 and
anhydrous FeCl3 at 0 °C; 4 was identified from its mp 44–46 °C (lit.8
44–46 °C), and by IR and NMR (1H and 13C) spectroscopy.
c Typical procedure (with DMF)—A mixture of diacetate 4 (1.0 mmol),
fused potassium acetate (1.0 mmol) and dry dimethyl formamide
(5 ml) was heated at 180 °C in a 10 ml round bottom flask carrying a
water condenser and guard tube (CaCl2). After being heated for 5 h,
the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, treated with
saturated NaHCO3 (2 ml) to ensure alkalinity and concentrated by
evaporation in vacuo. The mixture was then taken into a mixture of
diethyl ether and 6 N HCl, and the organic layer separated and
washed with water. The ether extract was dried (Na2SO4) and dis-
tilled in vacuo to remove the volatiles. The residue of crude cinnamic
acid (3) was purified by column chromatography over silica gel to
give pure 3 (0.66 mmol, 66%), identified by comparison with an
authentic sample employing the mp (132 °C, lit.d 133 °C), IR and
300 MHz 1H NMR spectra.
O
OAc O
O
O
O
O
+
Ph
O
Ph
H
Ph
Ph
O
V
2
IV
(-2)
OAc
O
O
OAc
3
CO2
Ph
Ph
O
Ph
(+ AcO )
VII
VI
Scheme 2.
acetic anhydride to furnish the gem-diacetate 4 in high
yields (Scheme 2):7,8 this then could well be the de facto
substrate in the Perkin reaction. Interestingly, this possi-
bility had indeed been considered very early but only to
be abandoned, apparently because of the poor yields of
cinnamic acid (3) obtained.3 In the present study, we
have shown that the yields of 3 can indeed be vastly
improved with 4 as the substrate if appropriate conditions
are employed. Thus, employing excess benzaldehyde, or
DMF as the solvent, or potassium tert-butoxide (KO-
But) as the base, led to excellent yields of cinnamic acid
(3) (Table 1, entries 3–5). Intriguingly, an excess of 1
leads to poor yields (Table 1, entry 2); this is explained
further below. (Higher yields indicate that a relatively
favourable pathway exists for the transformation.)
These considerations lead to the following reasonable
mechanistic conclusions which, although perhaps tenta-
tive, are at least compatible with the available evidence,
and can also form the basis of further work.
d Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Addison
Wesley Longman: Harlow, 1989; p 1038.
e t-BuOH may be substituted for THF as the solvent.
of acetic acid (ꢀ4.5). (The estimated pKa of IV is based
on the reported pKa of ꢀ12 for the analogous hemiace-
tal grouping in the sugars, e.g., 12.34 for D-glucose;9
alcohols possess pKa’s ꢀ17,4b so the inclusion of addi-
tional b oxygen atoms substantially lowers the pKa.
Note also that the electron withdrawing enol ether
moiety in IV would lower the pKa further.) Thus, the
process shown in III would be relatively favoured
thermodynamically, and possibly lead to ‘viable’
amounts of the incipient IV. (In fact, additional electro-
philic assistance by 1 itself could provide a further
kinetic advantage to the above deprotonation of 4 (cf.
Scheme 3); this would lead to the O-acetyl derivative
VIII, which could be O-deacetylated with acetate to
yield IV for further reaction with 2.)
The fact that employing excess benzaldehyde (2) leads to
vastly improved yields, suggests that 2 is the electro-
philic species involved. Furthermore, the high yields of
3 obtained from the reaction of diacetate 4 with KOBut
prove that it is possible to generate the enolate anion of
4, and effect the Perkin reaction with it. Of course, this is
not necessarily valid under the conditions of the original
Perkin reaction: clearly, the weakly basic acetate ion
normally employed therein could not normally deproto-
nate 4 (estimated pKa ꢀ 24).4 However, an interesting
assisted mechanism is possible, in which the ‘spectator’
acetate moiety in 4 participates electrophilically in the
deprotonation as shown in III, leading to the orthofor-
mate anion IV (Scheme 2).
The final formation of 3 follows from the initial addition
of IV to 2 yielding V, and the succeeding reactions via
VI and VII in Scheme 2. It is interesting and noteworthy
that the formation of VII from VI is accompanied by the
O
OAc
O
AcO
O
-AcO-
-AcOH
OAc
O
O
Interestingly, in IV the enolate moiety would gain
thermodynamic stability by covalent bonding of its
oxygen atom to the orthoformate carbon atom. In fact,
IV may be estimated to possess a pKa of ꢀ11, a value
closer—than that of 1 (pKa possibly >20)—to the pKa
Ph
O
Ph
O
O
H
VIII
III
Scheme 3.