Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 199–200
5 Ch.-Y. Chang, Ch.-E. Wu, Sh.-Y. Chen, C. Cui,Y.-J. Cheng, Ch.-S. Hsu,
However, the use of methyl malonate chloride (method ii) was
more practical for it provided almost the same yield of the
product 3. For the preparation of compound 4, we used the
corresponding acid chloride (method iii).
The electron-withdrawing properties of fullerene C60 moieties
in methanefullerenes 1 and 2 are further enhanced by additional
inductive effects of the ester group and the Cl atom, respectively,
which seems promising for practical use. The monomers 1 and 2
will be tested in polymerization and copolymerization reactions.
Y.-L. Wang and Y. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9368.
D. Guidi, B. M. Illescas, C. M. Atienza, M. Wielopolski and N. Martin,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1587.
P. A. Troshin and N. S. Sariciftci, in Supramolecular Chemistry: From
Molecules to Nanomaterials, eds. J. W. Steed and P. A. Gale, John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2012, p. 2725.
6
7
8 P. A. Troshin, R. N. Lyubovskaya and V. F. Razumov, Rossiiskie Nano-
tekhnologii, 2008, 3, 6 (in Russian).
9
X. Camps and A. Hirsch, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1997, 1595.
0 K. Ramalinga, P. Vijayalakshmi and T. N. B. Kaimal, Tetrahedron Lett.,
002, 43, 879.
1 O. Mitsunobu and M. Eguchi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1971, 44, 3427.
1
1
2
The authors are grateful to Professor L. M. Khalilov and V. M.
Yanybin for recording MALDI TOF mass spectra.
References
1
2
3
4
F. Zhou, C. Jehoulet and A. J. Bard, J. Am Chem. Soc., 1992, 114,
1004.
A. Hebard, M. Rossienski, R. Haddon, D. Murphy, S. Glarum, T. Palstra,
A. Ramires and A. Kortan, Nature, 1991, 350, 600.
K. Moriwaki, F. Matsumoto, Y. Takao, D. Shimizu and T. Ohno,
Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 7316.
1
Received: 23rd January 2012; Com. 12/3866
-Methacryloyloxyethyl dichloroacetate 4. iii) Dichloroacetyl chloride
2
(
(
0.1 g, 0.68 mmol) was added with cooling to a solution of compound 5
0.056 g, 0.55 mmol) in pyridine (0.5 ml) and the mixture was stirred at
Y.-J. Cheng, Sh.-H. Yang and Ch.-S. Hsu, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 5868.
room temperature for 12 h until the starting compound was consumed
the progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC). The mixture was then
diluted with CH Cl (30 ml), washed with 5% HCl to remove pyridine,
(
‡
2
-Methacryloyloxyethyl methyl malonate 3. i) Diisopropyl diazo-
2
2
dicarboxylate (0.424 g, 2.10 mmol) and PPh (0.55 g, 2.10 mmol) were
and dried with MgSO ; the solvent was evaporated. The product was
3
4
added with stirring in an argon flow to a solution of compound 5 (0.27 g,
purified on a column with SiO using CH Cl as the eluent. Yield 75%
2
2
2
–1
2
.60 mmol) and methyl hydrogen malonate (0.3 g, 2.50 mmol) in THF
(0.1 g). IR (n/cm ): 3013, 2963, 1769, 1751, 1718, 1635, 1454, 1369,
1
(
5 ml) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature until the starting
1323, 1296, 1159, 1055, 1031, 966, 945, 814. H NMR (CDCl ) d: 1.90
3
compound was consumed (the progress of the reaction was monitored by
TLC). The solvent was then removed on a rotary evaporator. The residue
was purified on a column with SiO using CH Cl –MeOH (20:1) as the
(t, 3H, Me, J 1.1 Hz), 4.40 and 4.50 (2m, 2×2H, OCH CH O), 5.57 (t,
2
2
1
3
1H, =CH , J 1.4 Hz), 5.96 (s, 1H, CHCl ), 6.09 (s, 1H, =CH ). C NMR
2
2
2
(CDCl ) d: 18.15 (Me), 61.59 (CH O), 63.93 (CHCl ), 64.81 (CH O), 126.40
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
eluent.Yield 55% (0.25 g). ii) Methyl malonate chloride (0.25 g, 1.83 mmol)
(=CH ) and 135.57 (=CMe), 164.32 and 166.86 (2CO ).
2
2
was added to a solution of compound 5 (0.2 g, 1.52 mmol) in pyridine
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate 5. Ethylene glycol (105.4 ml, 1.7 mol)
and iodine (0.1 g) were added to methacrylic acid (15 ml, 0.17 mol) and
the mixture was refluxed for 4 h. After cooling of the mixture, a solution
of NaCl was added. The mixture was extracted with CH Cl , the combined
(
3 ml) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature until the starting
compound was consumed (TLC control). The mixture was then diluted
with chloroform (30 ml), washed with 5% HCl and dried with MgSO4;
the solvent was evaporated. The product was purified on a column with
2
2
organic layers were washed with 5% aqueous Na S O and with saturated
2
2
3
SiO using EtOAc–light petroleum (1:3) as the eluent. Yield 57% (0.19 g).
IR (n/cm ): 2958, 2932, 2895, 1757, 1718, 1638, 1439, 1412, 1371, 1338,
NaCl solutions and then dried with MgSO . The solvent was distilled off
2
4
–1
in a rotary evaporator and the product was purified by distillation in vacuo.
–1
1
7
321, 1298, 1279, 1161, 1151, 1055, 1039, 1024, 949, 851, 815, 785, 851,
Bp 83–85°C (20 Torr). Yield 85%. IR (n/cm ): 3425, 2957, 2930, 2884,
1
1
58, 656, 603, 581, 521, 482. H NMR (CDCl ) d: 1.96 (t, 3H, Me, J 1.0
1714, 1635, 1454, 1321, 1298, 1170, 1080, 1033, 945, 903, 816. H NMR
3
and 1.6 Hz), 3.45 (s, 2H, CH ), 3.75 (s, 3H, OMe), 4.40 (m, 4H, 2CH O),
(CDCl ) d: 1.90 (t, 3H, Me, J 1.3 Hz), 3.80 (t, 2H, CH O, J 6.5 Hz), 4.25
2
2
3
2
13
5
.61 (t, 1H, =CH , J 1.6 Hz), 6.15 (s, 1H, =CH ). C NMR (CDCl ) d:
(t, 2H, CH O, J 6.5 Hz), 5.10 (t, 1H, =CH , J 1.3 Hz), 6.10 (s, 1H, =CH ).
2
2
3
2
2
2
13
1
8.06 (Me), 40.97 (CH ), 52.38 (OMe), 61.90 and 62.91 (2OCH ), 126.00
C NMR (CDCl ) d: 18.20 (Me), 61.01 and 66.24 (2OCH ), 126.01 (=CH ),
3 2 2
2
2
(
=CH ), 135.64 (=CMe), 166.10, 166.53 and 166.84 (CO ).
135.90 (=CMe), 167.73 (CO2).
2
2
–
200 –