inorganic compounds
Compound (I) at 100 K
Y1 and Y2. The Y1ÐO bond lengths vary between 2.231 (7) and
Ê Ê
.341 (7) A (mean 2.274 A) and the Y2ÐO bond lengths vary
2
between 2.244 (7) and 2.285 (9) A (mean 2.260 A). The SiO
hedron in the C2 structure is more distorted, with bond lengths
Crystal data
Ê
Ê
4
tetra-
�
3
Y
2
Si O
2 7
D
x
= 4.042 Mg m
M
r
= 345.98
Mo Kꢁ radiation
Cell parameters from 2397
re¯ections
Ê
Ê
ranging between 1.591 (9) and 1.659 (9) A (mean 1.625 A). In
Monoclinic, C2=m
Ê
a = 6.8667 (16) A
contrast with the C2 model reported by Cruickshank et al. (1962), our
ꢀ
Ê
b = 8.959 (2) A
ꢀ
C2 model contains an SiÐOÐSi angle of 179.2 (1) , and as in C2/m,
the bridging O atom shows a large anisotropic displacement
perpendicular to the SiÐO bond.
ꢄ = 3.8±32.1
ꢅ = 20.72 mm
T = 100 (1) K
Ê
ꢀ
Ê
� 1
c = 4.7167 (11) A
ꢀ
= 101.724 (18)
3
V = 284.11 (12) A
Z = 2
Cuboid, pale yellow
0.17 Â 0.15 Â 0.14 mm
For compound (I) at both 100 and 280 K, data collection: X-AREA
(
Stoe & Cie, 2002); cell re®nement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-RED
Stoe & Cie, 1996); structure solution: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997);
Data collection
(
Stoe IPDS-2 diffractometer
Rotation scans
Absorption correction: numerical
via equivalents (X-SHAPE and
X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 1996)
518 independent re¯ections
499 re¯ections with I > 2ꢆ(I)
structure re®nement: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997). For (I) at 280 K,
molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 1999);
preparation of publication material: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Rint = 0.042
ꢀ
ꢄ
max = 32.2
h = � 9 ! 10
k = � 13 ! 10
l = � 6 ! 6
GJR acknowledges ®nancial support from the Austrian
Academy of Science via an APART (Austrian Program for
Advanced Research and Technology) scholarship. The authors
also thank J. Barbier for constructive and useful comments.
Tmin = 0.057, Tmax = 0.111
1
660 measured re¯ections
Re®nement
2
2
2
2
Re®nement on F
R(F) = 0.021
o
w = 1/[ꢆ (F ) + (0.0237P)
+ 0.6763P]
where P = (F
2
wR(F ) = 0.048
S = 1.12
2
2
c
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: BC1023). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
o
+ 2F
)/3
(Á/ꢆ)max < 0.001
Áꢇmax = 0.75 e A
Ê
� 3
5
3
18 re¯ections
2 parameters
Ê
� 3
Áꢇmin = � 0.81 e A
Extinction correction: SHELXL97
Extinction coef®cient: 0.046 (3)
References
Batalieva, N. G., Bondar, I. A., Sidorenko, G. A. & Toropov, N. A. (1967).
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Chem. 173, 339±341.
Batalieva, N. G. & Pyatenko, Y. A. (1971). Kristallogra®ya, 16, 905±910.
Bianchi, R., Pilati, T., Diella, V., Gramaccioli, C. M. & Mannucci, G. (1988).
Am. Mineral. 73, 601±607.
Table 2
Selected geometric parameters (A, ) for (I) at 100 K.
Ê
ꢀ
i
v
YÐO3
YÐO3
YÐO2
YÐO2
YÐO3
2.2369 (16)
2.2369 (16)
2.2461 (15)
2.2461 (15)
2.3070 (18)
YÐO3
2.3070 (18)
1.619 (2)
1.6294 (9)
1.6325 (18)
1.6325 (18)
SiÐO2
SiÐO1
SiÐO3
SiÐO3
ii
Brandenburg, K. & Berndt, M. (1999). DIAMOND. Release 2.1b. Crystal
Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
iii
iv
vi
Brese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192±197.
Brown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244±247.
Christensen, A. N. (1994). Z. Kristallogr. 209, 7±13.
Cruickshank, D. W. J., Lynton, H. & Barclay, G. A. (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 491±
498.
Diaz, H. W., Glasser, F. P., Gunwardane, R. P. & Howie, R. A. (1990). Z.
Kristallogr. 191, 117±123.
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837±838.
Felsche, J. (1971). Z. Kristallogr. 133, 365±385.
Felsche, J. (1972). Naturwissenschaften, 59, 35±36.
Fleet, M. E. & Liu, X. (2000). Acta Cryst. B56, 940±946.
Gaewdang, T., Chaminade, J. P., Gravereau, P., Garcia, A., Fouassier, C.,
Pouchard, M. & Hagenmueller, P. (1994). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 620, 1965±
i
O3 ÐYÐO3
v
102.19 (9)
155.34 (8)
93.54 (6)
93.54 (6)
155.34 (8)
78.82 (9)
76.10 (7)
117.13 (7)
79.86 (8)
84.87 (8)
117.13 (7)
O3ÐYÐO3
v
76.10 (7)
84.87 (8)
79.86 (8)
160.21 (8)
106.23 (10)
111.79 (8)
108.31 (7)
111.79 (8)
108.31 (6)
110.22 (13)
180
i
O3 ÐYÐO2
O3ÐYÐO2
ii
ii
O2 ÐYÐO3
iii v
O2 ÐYÐO3
ii
i
O3 ÐYÐO2
O3ÐYÐO2
iii
iv
v
O3 ÐYÐO3
O2ÐSiÐO1
iii
ii
O2 ÐYÐO2
iii
vi
O2ÐSiÐO3
O1ÐSiÐO3
O2ÐSiÐO3
i
O3 ÐYÐO3
O3ÐYÐO3
iv
vi
iv
ii
O2 ÐYÐO3
iv
O1ÐSiÐO3
vi
O3 ÐSiÐO3
iii
O2 ÐYÐO3
iv
i
O3 ÐYÐO3
v
vii
Si ÐO1ÐSi
1970.
1
2
1
2
1
1
ICSD (2003). Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. FIZ Karlsruhe, Germany.
(URL: www.®z-informationsdienste.de/en/DB/icsd/index.html.)
Ito, J. & Johnson, H. (1968). Am. Mineral. 53, 1940±1952.
Kimata, M., Saito, S., Matsui, T., Shimizu, M. & Nishida, N. (1998). Neues
Jahrb. Mineral. Monatsh. pp. 361±372.
Liebau, F. (1986). Structural Chemistry of Silicates. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Patzke, G. R., Wartchow, R. & Binnewies, M. (2000). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst.
Struct. 215, 15±16.
Reid, A. F., Li, C. & Ringwood, A. E. (1977). J. Solid State Chem. 20, 219±226.
Robinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science, 172, 567±570.
Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T. (1969). Acta Cryst. B25, 925±946.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of
G oÈ ttingen, Germany.
Smolin, Yu. I. & Shepelev, Yu. F. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 484±492.
Smolin, Yu. I., Shepelev, Yu. F. & Butikova, I. K. (1972). Sov. Phys. Crystal-
logr. 16, 790±795.
Symmetry codes: (i) � x; y; � z; (ii) � x; � y; 1 � z; (iii) x �
;
2 2
y; z � 1; (iv)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
x �
;
� y; z; (v) � x; � y; � z; (vi) x; � y; z; (vii) � x; � y; 1 � z.
Structure solution using the 280 K data was initially performed in
space group C2, as E statistics suggested a non-centrosymmetric
2
space group (E � 1 = 0.745). The non-centrosymmetric structural
model found with the Patterson method could be re®ned down to
R1(all) = 2.5% and wR2(all) = 5.3%. However, the displacement
parameters for two of the four O atoms became non-positive de®nite.
Validation tests of the ®nal C2 structure model using the ADDSYM
option of PLATON (Spek, 2003) clearly showed the presence of
additional symmetry (mirror plane), suggesting that C2/m was the
correct space group. Thus, a new structure solution was tried,
revealing the known thortveitite structure type and yielding better
Smolin, Yu. I., Shepelev, Yu. F. & Titiov, A. P. (1973). Sov. Phys. Crystallogr.
17, 749±750.
®
nal residual values (with fewer re®ned parameters) and positive
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7±13.
de®nite displacement parameters for all atoms, even for the data
before absorption correction. The differences between the C2/m and
C2 structural models are very small. In C2, two different Y sites exist,
Stoe & Cie (1996). X-SHAPE and X-RED. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
Stoe & Cie (2002). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
Zachariasen, W. H. (1930). Z. Kristallogr. 73, 1±6.
ꢁ
i106 Redhammer and Roth
2
ꢀ-Y Si
O
2 7
at 100 and 280 K
Acta Cryst. (2003). C59, i103±i106