Paper
RSC Advances
skeleton. Furthermore, two new bands at 1040 cmꢀ1 and
1670 cmꢀ1 appeared aer the Fenton reaction and were
ascribed to the characteristic absorptions of –OH and –C]O,
respectively, which suggested alcohols or carboxylic acids might
be produced. These results corroborated that the benzene ring
and heterocyclic structure of HEBZ were destroyed aer the
Fenton reaction. In addition, hydramines, amides or carboxylic
acids may be generated.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China under grant number 81571812, and
a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Develop-
ment of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) under
grant number 1107047002.
To further probe the nal degradation products of HEBZ, the
HPLC pattern and GC-MS prole before and aer the Fenton
reaction were investigated (Fig. 7 and 8). As shown in Fig. 7a, the
HEBZ concentration varied from 2.5 g Lꢀ1 at the beginning, to
0 g Lꢀ1 when the Fenton reaction reached 40 min. Fig. 7b also
reveals that HEBZ (m/z ¼ 163.1) disappeared completely and
could be degraded into three new substances aer the Fenton
process. From the GC-MS prole in Fig. 8, it could be inferred
that the three new substances were 2-hydroxypropylamine (m/
z ¼ 75.1), oxalic acid (m/z ¼ 90.03) and 2-hydroxypropamide (m/
z ¼ 89.1), which was consistent with the results of UV-vis, PL
and FTIR. Moreover, according to the above results, the pathway
of a possible degradation mechanism of HEBZ is proposed in
Fig. 9. Briey, when cOH attacks the benzene ring of a HEBZ
molecule, the bonds may break down to form oxalic acid (the
bonds were broken from (1) (2) or (1) (6)). When the imidazole
heterocycle of HEBZ was attacked by cOH, 2-hydroxypropyl-
amine and 2-hydroxypropamide may be produced (the bonds
were broken from (3) (4) and (3) (5)). These small molecules may
be easily degraded via biological methods.
References
1 W. Zhang, X. Yang and D. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013,
52, 5765–5771.
2 F. Ting, Y. Li and Z. Hui, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2017, 56,
11684–11696.
3 O. Legrini, E. Oliveros and A. Braun, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93,
671–698.
4 A. Idil, A. Nuray and O. Tugba, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 96, 208–
217.
5 R. James, G. Keith and T. Willlam, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 73,
627–637.
6 I. Arslan-Alaton, T. Olmez-Hanci, B. Gursoy and G. Tureli,
Chemosphere, 2009, 76, 587–594.
7 I. Keisuke and G. Mohamed, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 2005, 27, 83–
114.
8 C. P. Huang and D. Chen, Waste Manage., 1993, 13, 361–377.
9 N. N. Rao, G. Bose, P. Khare and S. N. Kaul, J. Environ. Eng.,
2006, 132, 367–376.
10 S. W. Peng and W. J. Zhang, J. Environ. Sci., 2016, 41, 16–23.
11 J. P. Joseph, O. Esther and M. Allison, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci.
Technol., 2007, 36, 1–84.
4. Conclusions
12 M. S. Ewa, W. Anna and S. Piotr, J. Hazard. Mater., 2007, 147,
497–502.
In this work, the effect of different feeding modes (one-time
feeding, uniform feeding and uniform deceleration feeding)
on Fenton response efficiency was studied by monitoring the
production of cOH and the COD removal rate. According to the
reaction mechanism, uniform deceleration feeding was the
optional feeding method out of these three feeding methods. In
this feeding mode, the quantity of cOH generated and
consumed may be controlled to be roughly the same by slowing
the speed at which Fe2+ and H2O2 were added; this greatly
reduced the quenching of cOH and enhanced its utilization
efficiency. With this feeding mode, the total concentration of
cOH reached a maximum (247.77 mM) and the COD removal rate
was also highest (79.3%), which greatly improved the degrada-
tion efficiency of HEBZ in wastewater. Notably, the degradation
pathway suggested that the Fenton reaction was suitable for
dealing with the refractory HEBZ, and HEBZ could eventually be
decomposed into 2-hydroxypropylamine, oxalic acid and 2-
hydroxypropamide, as determined using UV-vis, PL, FTIR,
HPLC and GC-MS analysis. More signicantly, these small
molecules produced in the Fenton reaction can be degraded
easily via biological and various other methods.
13 M. A. Behnajady, N. Modirshahla and F. Ghanbary, J.
Hazard. Mater., 2007, 148, 98–102.
14 C. M. Francisca, A. R. Rui and B. Enric, Appl. Catal., B, 2017,
202, 217–267.
15 H. Zhou and D. Smith, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 2001, 28, 49–66.
¨
16 T. Oppenlander, Photochemical Purication of Water and Air,
2002, pp. 12–30.
17 X. H. Sun, Y. Y. Jia and J. Ma, Technol. Water Treat., 2009, 35,
74–78.
18 C. L. Yap, S. Gan and H. K. Ng, Chemosphere, 2011, 83, 1414–
1430.
19 G. Elodie, T. Stephane, L. Claude and A. Mehmet, Environ.
Chem. Lett., 2003, 1, 38–44.
20 G. A. Abdollah, E. S. H. Zahra and M. A. Bahrami, J. Environ.
Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 2313–2324.
21 Z. Yan, M. Gao, S. G. Wang and W. Z. Zhou, Electrochim. Acta,
2017, 231, 694–770.
22 B. J. De, X. Y. Liu and X. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2018, 112,
209–215.
´
´
23 A. J. Exposito, J. M. Monteagudo and I. Duran, J. Hazard.
Mater., 2018, 342, 597–605.
24 F. Spyros, M. M. Jose and D. Antonio, Electrochim. Acta, 2018,
612, 605–612.
25 C. Irene, S. Carla and P. Laura, Chemosphere, 2015, 130, 73–
81.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts to declare.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 9741–9748 | 9747