10.1002/cbic.202000679
ChemBioChem
COMMUNICATION
To exclude any of our assay conditions causing these effects, we
determined the KM for 1a of the corresponding enzyme from
Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius (GtPyNP) and observed classic
Michaelis-Menten behavior with no evidence of inhibition up to
50 mM 1a in agreement with the available literature (Figure
S3).[13] Interestingly, similar inhibition effects of TtPyNP were also
observed, to varying degrees, with the nucleosides 1d and 1f
(Figure S6), revealing that inhibition of this enzyme by
nucleobases is not limited to 2a. Together, these results present
evidence that TtPyNP is inhibited by nucleobases through a yet
unknown mechanism. The reason(s) for this apparent product
inhibition (or substrate inhibition, depending on the direction) are
unclear to date as TtPyNP shares high structural[29] and sequence
identity (see Figure 1 in [13]) to other thymidine and pyrimidine
nucleoside phosphorylases concerning the active site residues
and overall protein structure. Although substrate inhibition is
known for uridine phosphorylases,[28,30] this is, to the best of our
knowledge, the first reported example of a pyrimidine nucleoside
phosphorylase being competitively substrate/product-inhibited.
However, we doubt that this inhibition of TtPyNP holds any
physiological significance, as the intracellular concentrations of
nucleosides and their bases are typically in the low micromolar
range, which is more than two orders of magnitude lower than the
concentrations necessary to effect significant inhibition of TtPyNP.
In any case, this clearly makes TtPyNP a rather suboptimal
candidate for preparative purposes. In order to achieve
satisfactory product titers, substrate concentrations of at least
100 mM typically need to be applied.[12,31,32] Our characterization
revealed that TtPyNP is severely inhibited by nucleobases at
concentrations upwards of 0.5 mM, which limits its reactivity both
in the phosphorolysis and glycosylation direction and renders its
performance in potential industrial applications subpar.
with metadata and calculations are freely available from an
external online repository.[20] Likewise, reference spectra and
software for spectral unmixing are available from the same
repository[35,36] and described in previous works.[33,34]
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Kerstin Heinecke (TU Berlin) for proofreading
and critical comments.
Keywords: nucleoside • nucleoside phosphorylase •
thermostable • cosolvent • enzyme
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
H. Yehia, S. Kamel, K. Paulick, A. Wagner, P. Neubauer, Curr. Pharm.
Des. 2017, 23, 6913–6935.
S. Kamel, M. Weiß, H. F. T. Klare, I. A. Mikhailopulo, P. Neubauer, A.
Wagner, Mol. Catal. 2018, 458, 52–59.
M. Rabuffetti, T. Bavaro, R. Semproli, G. Cattaneo, M. Massone, F. C.
Morelli, G. Speranza, D. Ubiali, Catalysts 2019, 9, 355.
S. Kamel, H. Yehia, P. Neubauer, A. Wagner, in Enzym. Chem. Synth.
Nucleic Acid Deriv., 2019, 1–28.
R. T. Giessmann, N. Krausch, F. Kaspar, N. M. Cruz Bournazou, A.
Wagner, P. Neubauer, M. Gimpel, Processes 2019, 7, 380.
F. Kaspar, R. T. Giessmann, K. F. Hellendahl, P. Neubauer, A. Wagner,
M. Gimpel, ChemBioChem 2020, 21, 1428–1432.
F. Kaspar, R. T. Giessmann, P. Neubauer, A. Wagner, M. Gimpel, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 867–876.
M. S. Drenichev, C. S. Alexeev, N. N. Kurochkin, S. N. Mikhailov, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 305–312.
C. S. Alexeev, M. S. Drenichev, E. O. Dorinova, R. S. Esipov, I. V
Kulikova, S. N. Mikhailov, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Proteins Proteomics
2020, 1868, 140292.
In conclusion, we characterized the hyperthermostable
pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase from Thermus thermophilus
and revealed its exceptional working space, broad substrate
scope as well as excellent stability and tolerance to organic
cosolvents. However, its inhibition by nucleobases even at low
concentrations discourages its use in synthetic applications.
These observations make TtPyNP an outlier among pyrimidine
nucleoside phosphorylases, displaying unmatched stability and a
rare example of substrate/product inhibition.
[10] X. Zhou, K. Szeker, B. Janocha, T. Böhme, D. Albrecht, I. A. Mikhailopulo,
P. Neubauer, FEBS J. 2013, 280, 1475–1490.
[11] I. Serra, T. Bavaro, D. A. Cecchini, S. Daly, A. M. Albertini, M. Terreni, D.
Ubiali, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2013, 95, 16–22.
[12] F. Kaspar, M. R. L. Stone, P. Neubauer, A. Kurreck, ChemRxiv 2020,
DOI 10.26434/chemrxiv.12753413.v1
[13] K. Szeker, X. Zhou, T. Schwab, A. Casanueva, D. Cowan, I. A.
Mikhailopulo, P. Neubauer, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2012, 84, 27–34.
[14] K. F. Hellendahl, F. Kaspar, X. Zhou, Z. Huang, P. Neubauer, A. Wagner,
2020, in preparation.
[15] M. Almendros, J. Berenguer, J.-V. Sinisterra, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
2012, 78, 3128–3135.
Experimental Section
[16] H. Yehia, S. Westarp, V. Röhrs, F. Kaspar, T. R. Giessmann, F. T. H.
Klare, K. Paulick, P. Neubauer, J. Kurreck, A. Wagner, Molecules 2020,
25, 934.
Enzymatic reactions were prepared from stock solutions of
nucleoside, potassium phosphate and buffer and started via the
addition of enzyme. Reaction conditions were applied as stated in
the figure captions and the Supporting Information. Reaction
monitoring was performed as described previously.[7,33,34]
Typically, samples of 50 µL were withdrawn from reaction
mixtures containing 1 mM UV-active compounds and pipetted into
450 µL 100 mM aqueous NaOH to stop the reaction. To record
the UV spectra of these alkaline samples, 200 µL of the quenched
samples were transferred to a UV/Vis-transparent 96-well plate
(UV star, GreinerBioOne, Kremsmünster, Austria) and UV
absorption spectra were recorded from 250 to 350 nm in steps of
1 nm with a high-throughput plate reader (BioTek Instruments,
Winooski, USA). The obtained experimental UV spectra were
then deconvoluted via spectral unmixing using suitable reference
spectra of the nucleoside and nucleobase to derive the respective
degree of conversion. All raw data presented in this report, along
[17] R. T. Giessmann, F. Kaspar, P. Neubauer, A. Kurreck, M. Gimpel in
preparation,
preliminary
dataset
available
at
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.3572070.
[18] N. Hori, M. Watanabe, Y. Yamazaki, Y. Mikami, Agric. Biol. Chem. 1990,
54, 763–768.
[19] H. Eyring, J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 107–115.
[20] F. Kaspar, 2020, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4284188.
[21] Biphasic systems involving hydrophobic solvents are not an option as
nucleosides are virtually insoluble in all apolar solvents.
[22] Even at lower temperatures, small alcohols are unfavorable cosolvents
as they work excellently as quenching agents for nucleoside
phosphorylases.
[23] C. M. Alder, J. D. Hayler, R. K. Henderson, A. M. Redman, L. Shukla, L.
E. Shuster, H. F. Sneddon, Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3879–3890.
[24] H. J. Wiggers, J. Cheleski, A. Zottis, G. Oliva, A. D. Andricopulo, C. A.
Montanari, Anal. Biochem. 2007, 370, 107–114.
[25] S. Roy, B. Jana, B. Bagchi, J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 115103.
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.