deficient unsaturated amides and esters,17 which are subjected to
Michael addition reaction,18 the tetrapeptide 16 was synthesized.
Instructively, the tetrapeptide was isolated without any side
products. All tetrapeptides were isolated with satisfactory
yields within 5 min and are given in Table 1.
of a mixture of elemental sulphur (S7, S18 etc.) in the reaction
mixture, the detailed mechanism of the liberation of sulfur in the
reaction needs to be investigated.
In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated a novel,
ultrafast, scalable amide bond synthesis in methanol with a range
of amides and peptides. The coupling products of sterically
hindered amino acids, tri and tetrapeptides were isolated in less
than few minutes. This protocol can be utilized for the synthesis
of synthetically challenging membrane peptides and peptides
containing sterically hindered amino acids.
In hindsight, the comparable results of 30 mol% of copper
sulfate with that of 100 mol% provoked us to investigate the
role of insoluble byproduct CuS in the coupling reactions. To
understand whether or not CuS is involved in the amide bond
formation, a control reaction with Boc-Ala-SH and benzylamine
was carried out in the presence of 30 mol% of CuS. Surprisingly,
the formation of an amide bond was observed with the same rate
as that of copper sulfate. To verify its compatibility, we further
synthesized dipeptides 2, 3, 10, tripeptide 13 and the tetrapeptide
14 (Table 1). We found no difference between the insoluble CuS
and the soluble CuSO4. Further, we carried out the amide bond
formation using Boc-Ala-SH and H-Leu-OMe in neat methanol
after filtering the CuS to verify whether or not the CuS treated
methanol will accelerate reaction. Results suggest that there was
no acceleration of amide bond formation even after 24 h,
indicating the need of CuS to accelerate the reaction. Albeit it
is contradicting to our initial assumption regarding the solubility
of copper sulfate, the serendipity provides insight into the role of
metal sulfides as catalysts in the peptide bond formation using
thioacids.19 In contrast to the model experiments on the fixation
of the carbon monoxide and the activation of thioacetic acid on
metal sulfides under primordial conditions,19 we observed only
amide bond formation in the CuS catalyzed reaction. Based on
these observations, we propose the possible mechanism for the
amide bond synthesis (Scheme 5). We anticipate that the initial
step proceeds with direct involvement of the copper complex
(CuSO4Á5H2O) in the reaction leading to the formation of CuS
and the amide bond. Subsequently, the in situ generated CuS acts
as a catalyst to activate the thioacid through coordination. The
reaction between the activated intermediate and the free amine leads
to the formation of an amide bond along with the regeneration of
CuS (Scheme 5). Though the LC-MS analysis suggests the presence
We are thankful to DST, Govt of India, for financial
support. S.M.M. and S.V.J. are thankful to CSIR, for a
research fellowship.
Notes and references
1 A. El-Faham and F. Albericio, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 6557–6602;
E. Valeur and M. Bradley, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 606–631;
P. Lloyd-Williams, F. Albericio and E. Giralt, Chemical Approaches to
the Synthesis of Peptides and Proteins, CRC, Boca Raton, 1997;
C. L. Allen and J. M. J. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3405–3415.
2 V. R. Pattabiraman and J. W. Bode, Nature, 2011, 480, 471–479.
3 P. Wang and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
17045–17051; P. Wang, X. Li, J. Zhu, J. Chen, Y. Yuan, X. Wu
and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 1597–1602;
W. Wu, Z. Zhang and L. S. Liebeskind, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
133, 14256–14259.
4 N. Shangguan, S. Katukojvala, R. Greenberg and L. J. Williams,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 7754–7755.
5 Y. Rao, X. Li and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
12924–12926.
6 D. Crich, K. Sana and S. Guo, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 4423–4426.
7 J. Pan, N. O. Devarie-Baez and M. Xian, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
1092–1094.
8 D. Crich and K. Sasaki, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3514–3517.
9 D. Crich and I. Sharma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2355–2358.
10 F. B. Dyer, C. M. Park, R. Joseph and P. Garner, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2011, 133, 20033–20035. In this article authors demonstrated
the native chemical ligation of thioacids and aziridines mediated by
copper acetate.
11 M. A. Fischbach and C. T. Walsh, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106,
3468–3496; S. A. Sieber and M. A. Marahiel, Chem. Rev., 2005,
105, 715–738.
12 J. Blake, Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 1981, 17, 273–274; J. Blake and
C. H. Li, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1981, 78, 4055–4058.
13 M.-C. Maurel and L. E. Orgel, Origins Life Evol. Biosphere, 2000,
30, 423–430.
14 N. N. Greenwood and A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of Elements,
Elsevier, 2nd edn, 2005; M. E. Fleet, Rev. Mineral. Geochem.,
2006, 61, 365–420; A. L. Abdelhady, K. Ramasamy, M. A. Malik,
P. O’Brien, S. J. Haigh and J. Raftery, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21,
17888–17895; Y. Zhao, H. Pan, Y. Lou, X. Qiu, J. Zhu and
C. Burda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4253–4261.
15 M. G. Ryadnov, L. V. Klimenko and Y. V. Mitin, J. Pept. Res.,
1999, 53, 322–328; N. Thieriet, F. Guibe and F. Albericio, Org.
´
Lett., 2000, 2, 1815–1817; J. Coste, D. Le-Nguyen and B. Castro,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 205–208.
16 A. S. Goldstein and M. H. Gelb, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41,
2797–2800.
17 S. M. Mali, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. V. Jadhav, M. Ganesh Kumar
and H. N. Gopi, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 6566–6574.
18 S. B. Tsogoeva, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 1701–1716; P. Perlmutter,
Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic Synthesis, Pergamon,
Oxford, 1992.
Scheme 5 Proposed mechanism for the CuSO4Á5H2O mediated and
CuS catalyzed amide bond synthesis.
19 C. Huber and G. Wachtershauser, Science, 1997, 276, 245–247.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7085–7087 7087