alkenes over â-zeolite, H-mordenite and ZSM-12 in Sivasank-
er’s laboratory22,23 including a recent report24 on alkylation
of benzene with 1-dodecene on H-USY, HY, H-mordenite,
Mg-H-mordenite, Fe-Mg-H-mordenite and H-ZSM-5.
Mixtures of LABS of different chain length are preferred
in detergents in order to handle any of several end uses in
which a particular formulation may be employed.10 The effect
of carbon chain length and phenyl isomer distribution on
the properties of LABS was studied and a comparison made
of high and low 2-phenyl LABS homologues11 to establish
that the 2-phenyl content had little effect on LABS perfor-
mance in both light- and heavy-duty detergent applications,
and the carbon number chain size was far more important.
However, the biodegradability of 2-phenyl and 3-alkane
isomer is higher than the central ones such as 4-, 5- and 6-
phenyldodecanes.13 Some catalysts do not produce 6-isomer
at all.22,25 Baumgartner14 claimed that optimum detergency
power occurs, when the linear alkyl chain contains 11 to 12
carbon atoms. In the case of n-phenyldocanes and their
sulphonates, the position of benzene ring in the alkyl chain
affects the ease of biodegradability, with external isomers
being more readily degraded than the internal ones.25,26 Thus
2-, 3-, and 4- phenyldodecanes would be preferred for
making LABS from biodegradability viewpoint in compari-
son with the 5- and 6- isomers. The ratio of total concentra-
tions of 2-, 3- and 4- isomers to that of 5- and 6- isomers
(with no branched phenyldocanes or didoceylbenzenes) is
taken as a yardstick of biodegradability and environmental
acceptability27 and less content of 5- and 6-isomers is
beneficial for sulphonation and formulation. The longer the
alkyl chain in a LAB the better is the degradation and
2-phenyldodecane is the most biodegradable in all homo-
logues.
clays, pillared clays, clay supported heteropolyacids, and
sulphated zirconia with a view to find the most active catalyst
and favourable product distribution useful for making LABS.
Some of these catalysts can be synthesised more easily and
cheaply and have proved to be better than zeolites for liquid-
phase reactions. This paper delineates the evaluation of
several catalysts including kinetic modelling.
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Catalysts. 1-Dodecene, 1-octene, 1-decene
and 1-tetradecene (99% pure) were obtained from Albemarle
Corporation, USA. Authentic samples of phenyldodecanes
and phenyldidocanes were obtained from Indian Petrochemi-
cal Ltd, Baroda, India. Benzene (A. R.), dodecatungstophos-
phoric acid (DTP), dodecatungstosilicic acid (DTS), dode-
camolybdophosphoric acid (DMP) were obtained from s.d.
Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. K-10 montmoril-
lonite clay was obtained from Fluka, Germany. Filtrol-24
was procured from Engelhard Inc.
The following catalysts were prepared by well-developed
procedures and characterised in this laboratory. 20% w/w
heteropolyacids (DTP, DTS and DMP) supported on K-10
clay,28 Al pillared clay,28 20% DTP/silica,30 10%AlCl3/10%
FeCl3/K-10,28 Cr-exchanged K-10,28 sulphated zirconia,29 Zr-
exchanged K-1028 and 20% DTP/activated carbon.30
Apparatus and Reaction Procedure. All experiments
were conducted in a batch mode by using a 100 mL capacity
Parr autoclave. A standard experiment consisted of 0.041
mol of 1-dodecene and 0.41 mol of benzene and a known
quantity of catalyst (typically 0.05 g/mL). The autoclave was
gradually heated to 150 °C and stirring was then started at
1000 rpm, under autogenous-pressure. Samples were with-
drawn at regular intervals starting from initial time and
analysed by gas chromatography.
From the foregoing it is evident that there is a scope in
developing newer catalytic processes for LAB manufacture,
particularly since there is no open literature on kinetics and
product distribution using non-zeolitic catalysts which may
be cheaper. We have reported the novelty and efficacy of
clay supported heteropolyacids in a large number of pro-
cesses, with reference to a variety of industries such as
pharmaceuticals and drugs, rubber chemicals, dyestuff,
agrochemicals, and perfumery and flavour chemicals.28-39
Thus the aim of the current research was to evaluate the
applicability of a variety of non-zeolitic solid acids, such as
Analysis. A gas chromatograph (Perkin-Elmer Model
8500) with a flame ionisation detector was used with 2m ×
0.003 m column, packed with 10% OV 17/chromosorb WHP.
Synthetic mixtures were used for calibration and quantifica-
tion of the collected data. After the catalyst was filtered,
products were separated by fractional distillation. Benzene
was removed first followed by unreacted 1-dodecene and
then alkylbenzenes were distilled out under vacuum. Iden-
tification was made through GC-MS as well as by compari-
son with authentic material.
(22) Sivasanker, S.; Thangaraj A. J. Catal. 1992, 138, 386.
(23) Sivasanker, S. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Guisnet, M.,
Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1993; Vol. 75, p397.
Results and Discussion
(24) Wang, B.; Lee, C. W.; Cai, T. X.; Park, S. E. Catal. Lett. 2001, 76, 99.
(25) Bhatia, M.; Singh, H. D. J. Biosci. 1996, 21, 487.
(26) Johnson, S. J.; Barry, D. A.; Christofi, N.; Patel, D. Land Contam. Reclaim.
2001, 9, 279.
Comparison of Activities of Different Catalysts. Several
catalysts were employed to evaluate their efficacy in the
alkylation of benzene with 1-dodecene at a mol ratio of 10:1
benzene/1-dodecene. Table 1 lists the efficacy of the various
catalysts in order of their activity with the corresponding
selectivity to 2- and 3-phenyldodecanes. The K-10 clay-based
catalysts were more effective, which included heteropolyacids
(DTP, DMP, and DTS) supported on K-10, Filtrol-24 clay,
Al-pillared K-10 clay, and K-10 clay itself. Twenty percent
(27) Takada, H.; Ishiwatari, R. EnViron. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 86.
(28) Yadav, G. D.; Kirthivasan, N. J. Chem. Commun. 1995, 203.
(29) Kumbhar, P. S.; Yadav, G. D. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 2535.
(30) Thorat, T. S.; Yadav, V. M.; Yadav, G. D. Appl. Catal., A 1992, 90, 73.
(31) Yadav, G. D.; Mehta, P. H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2198.
(32) Yadav, G. D.; Thorat, T. S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996,35, 721.
(33) Yadav, G. D.; Bokade, V. V. Appl. Catal., A 1996, 147, 299.
(34) Yadav, G. D.; Kirthivasan, N. Appl. Catal., A 1997, 154, 29.
(35) Yadav, G. D.; Satoskar, D. V. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1997, 69,
438.
(36) Yadav, G. D.; Krishnan, M. S. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1998, 2, 95.
(37) Yadav, G. D.; Krishnan, M. S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 3358.
(38) Yadav G. D.; Nair, J. J. Chem. Commun., 1998, 2370.
(39) Yadav, G. D.; Kirthivasan, N. In Fundamental and Applied Aspects of
Chemically Modified Surfaces; Blitz, J. P., Little, C. B., Eds.; Royal Society
of Chemistry: London, 1999; pp 254-269.
264
•
Vol. 6, No. 3, 2002 / Organic Process Research & Development