392
STOROZHENKO et al.
Table 3. Performance of synthesis tetraalkyltin by batch and continuous methods
Performance, mol h–1 l–1
Method
Пcont/Пperiodic
References
Et4Sn
n-Bu4Sn
n-Oct4Sn
Periodic
Continous
0.019
0.414
–
–
21.7
6.71
8.44
[23]
Our data
Periodic
Continous
–
0.030
0204
–
[24]
Our data
Periodic
Continous
–
–
0.024
0.205
[25]
Our data
istry, Wilkinson, G., Stone, F.G.A., and Abel, E.W., Eds.,
Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1984.
hydrolyzer, and settler, was 0.412–0.414 for tetraethyltin
and 0.187–0.205 mol h–1 L–1 for other tetraorganotins
(Table 3). For comparison Table 3 shows the performance
of the known methods for obtaining tetraalkyltin based
on periodic organomagnesium synthesis calculated
approximately, since in the examples [23–25] the volumes
of the main equipment are not always given. In these
cases, the volume of the equipment was calculated by the
volume of the loaded reagents, solvents, water, etc. In the
examples also the time of the basic operations (addition,
exposure, hydrolysis, etc.) are not always given, in such
cases the data are taken according to the conventional
practice of the processes. The data in Table 3 show that the
hourly yield per unity of volume of the basic equipment
for continuous organomagnesium method of producing
tetraalkyltin is several times higher than periodic.
4. Butts, M., Cella, J., Wood, C.D. et al., Kirk-Othmer En-
cyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5th ed. New Jersey:
J. Wiley Interscience, 2006.
5. Davies, A.G., Organotin Chemistry, Weinheim: Wiley–
VCH, 2004.
6. Evans, C.J. and Karpel, S., J. Organometal. Chem. Library,
1985, vol. 16, pp. 1–279.
7. Shiryaev, V.I., Agrokhimiya, 2010, no. 3, pp. 83–94.
8. Shiryaev, V.I. and Storozhenko, P.A., Vse materialy: En-
tsiklopedicheskii Sprav., 2011, no. 10, pp. 23–35.
9. Shiryaev, V.I. and Storozhenko, P.A., Vse materialy: En-
tsiklopedicheskii Sprav., 2011, no. 11, pp. 42–49.
10. Shiryaev, V.I. and Storozhenko, P.A., Vse materialy: En-
tsiklopedicheskii Sprav., 2011, no. 12, pp. 38–52.
11. Shiryaev, V.I. and Storozhenko, P.A., Vse materialy: En-
tsiklopedicheskii Sprav., 2012, no. 1, pp. 34–47.
CONCLUSIONS
12. Hadjikakou, S.K. and Hadjiliadis, N., Coord. Chem. Rev.,
As a result of these studies, a continuous organomag-
nesium synthesis of tetraorganosilanes, -germanes, and
-stannanes was developed. The process of obtaining or-
ganoelement compounds differs from the known methods
by high performance and safety that allows attributed it
to the technologies of the 21st century, the concept of
“Green chemistry.”
2009, vol. 253, pp. 235–249.
13. Bock, R., Residue Reviews, Gunther, F.A., Ed., 1981,
vol. 79, 270 p.
14. Kustov, L.M. and Beletskaya, I.P., Ros. Khim. Zh., 2004,
vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 3–12.
15. Garst, J.F. and Soriaga, M.P., Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004,
vol. 248, pp. 623–652.
16. Rakita, P.E., Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical
Technology, 5th ed. 2005, vol. 12, pp. 818–838.
REFERENCES
17. Bryce-Smith, D. and Cox, G.F., J. Chem. Soc., 1961,
1. Ioffe, S.T. and Nesmeyanov, A.N., Metody elementoor-
ganicheskoi khimii: Magnii, berilii, kal’tsii, strontsii, barii
(Methods of Organoelemental Chemistry: Magnesium,
Beryllium, Calcium, Strontium, Barium), Moscow: Nauka,
1963.
pp. 1175–1182.
18. Zakharkin, L.I., Okhlobystin, O.Yu., and Strunin, B.N.,
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1962, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 108–110.
19. Klokov, B.A., Metalloorgan. Khim., 1992, vol. 5, no. 1,
2. Harwood. J.H., Industrial Applications of Organometallic
Compounds, Reinhold Pub. Corp., 1963.
pp. 83–105.
20. Klokov, B.A., Doctoral Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation, Mos-
3. Lindsell W.E., in Comprehensive Organometallic Chem-
cow, 2000.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 86 No. 3 2013