282
I. Pollini / Physics Letters A 277 (2000) 281–286
energy on the positions of the neighbour ions, im-
plies in general an important electron–phonon inter-
action. The most evident and primary effect of the
ep coupling is represented by the multiphonon struc-
tures observed in the optical absorption spectra of
TMHs. These electronic excitations can be classified
on the basis of the exciton polaron model [4] as vi-
bronic excitons with small excitations transfer. The
observed phonon progressions are in fact reminis-
cent of those predicted theoretically for small Huang–
Rhys factors S0 (S0 < 3) and small exciton bandwidth
(B < 1). The situation is similar to that occurring for
localized centres in semiconductors and insulators [5].
The only difference is that these complex elemen-
tary excitations may interact with phonons via dif-
ferent mechanisms, due to the two exciton degrees
of freedom. In fact, phonons can interact with exci-
tons either through the centre-of-mass translation or
through the hole–electron internal motion. Depend-
ing on which interaction is dominant, one can have
either phonon-assisted processes (in semiconductors)
or trapped excitons (in alkali halides), which inter-
act with phonons in the same way as in local cen-
tres [5,6].
In layered TMHs, for example, the ep interaction
yields in general a complex vibronic structure ob-
served in many CF bands [7]. The quasi-molecular
nature of these crystals, due to their low dimensional
structure and reduced ionicity [8], results in a flat
dispersion of both d–d excitons and optical phonons
(vibronic excitons with small excitation transfer) [4].
This allows for the experimental observation of sharp
phonon progressions in the absorption spectra of
dn + dn parity forbidden transitions. Therefore it ap-
pears that the occurrence of such phonon progres-
sions is a general phenomenon to be considered when
analysing the visible and infrared spectra of TMHs and
have indicated the need of knowing quantitatively the
lattice dynamics of layer structures [9,10]. Moreover,
from these structures one can learn much on the dy-
namics of the excited states. It is known that when the
ep interaction is given by a purely orbital one-electron
operator, a vanishing first-order linear coupling is ex-
pected between an ideal isoconfigurational (phonon-
assisted) electronic transition and even parity phonons.
Second-order phonon progressions would then be pre-
dicted in the sidebands of isoconfigurational transi-
tions.
In intra-configurational transitions of TMHs with
half-filled shells [d3(t2g); d5(t3 eg2); d8(eg)] the orbital
ep coupling vanishes to first2gorder for the Wigner–
Eckart theorem [3]. In particular, if the states have a
half-filled subshell configuration such as t32g, one may
show the calculation of the matrix elements for a low-
symmetry potential V (Γ ),
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢀ
0ꢂ
3
3
t2gSΓ V (Γ ) t2gSΓ = 0 (Γ = Γ 0),
(1)
ꢁ
ꢁ
only for the combinations
2
2
SΓ = E,2T1 and SΓ 0 = T2,
and vice versa. Similarly, for the e2g configuration, one
finds that
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢀ
0ꢂ
2
2
egSΓ V (Γ ) egSΓ = 0 (Γ = Γ 0)
(2)
ꢁ
ꢁ
only for the combinations
1
1
SΓ = E and SΓ 0 = A1,
and vice versa. The group-theory results in Eqs. (1)
and (2), valid for the t32g and e2g configurations,
indicate which are the expected electronic bands
likely to be observed in experiments. As for the
tn2gemg configuration, further inspection of the matrix
elements for the case n + m = 5 (case: n = 3, m = 2)
shows again that the only allowed CF transitions are
the ones listed in Table 1.
Thus, a second-order progression is expected to be
the basic vibronic structure, provided that also the
spin-dependent ep interaction (via the phonon mod-
ulation of spin–orbit coupling) be zero. Time ago we
have reported a clear evidence of two-phonon progres-
sions, due to the second-order linear electron–phonon
operator, in NiCl2 and NiBr2 crystals [d8(eg) config-
uration], by comparing the phonon structure observed
1
in the 3A2(F) + E(D) CF bands with the Raman spec-
tra measured on the same samples [11]. The vanishing
of the spin-dependent first-order electron–phonon in-
teraction was then shown to be a necessary condition
for observing prominent second-order phonon struc-
tures in the intra-configurational transitions observed
in these compounds.
The evidence of pure two-phonon progressions
observed in late TMCs (i.e., in nickel and manganese
dihalides) has then suggested to verify whether the
same phenomenon may be observed in early TMHs,
where a different type of electronic structure can