Enzymatic Synthesis of 4-Hydroxyisoleucine
1609
ꢀ
ution obtained was reacted with AccQ-Tag fluorescence
derivatization reagent (Waters, Milford, MA) to deriva-
tize HIL to AccQ-Tag-derivated HIL, and 10 ml of the
reaction mixture was subjected to amino acid analysis.
626. All procedures were carried out at 0–5 C, and a 20
mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM dithio-
0
.
threitol, 1 mM MnCl 4H O, 0.05 mM pyridoxal 5 -
phosphate (PLP), and 5% ethylene glycol (buffer A)
was used as the standard buffer.
2
2
Analytical methods. Quantitative analysis of AccQ-
Tag-derivatized HIL was performed with an amino acid
analyzer (Waters 2695 Separation Module System;
Waters) equipped with an AccQ-Tag column (3:9 ꢁ
Step 1: Preparation of a cell-free extract. A. simplex
AKU 626 was cultivated in 10 liters of Medium B at
ꢀ
28 C for 48 h with shaking, and the cells were collected
ꢀ
by centrifugation at 12;000 ꢁ g for 20 min at 4 C (High
1
50 mm; Waters). The AccQ-Tag-derivatized HIL was
Mac CR21). The cells obtained (about 100 g wet-
weight) were suspended in 150 ml of buffer A, and then
ultrasonically disrupted for 10 min (19 kHz, Insonator
model 201M; Kubota, Osaka, Japan) with cooling by
water and ice. After centrifugation at 12;000 ꢁ g for
eluted with AccQ-Tag Eluent A (Waters) and acetoni-
trile at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The gradient program
used was as follows: initial 0% acetonitrile (100%
AccQ-Tag Eluent A); linear gradient for 0.5 min to 1%
acetonitrile; linear gradient for 17.5 min to 5% acetoni-
trile; linear gradient for 1 min to 9% acetonitrile; linear
gradient for 10.5 min to 17% acetonitrile; linear gradient
for 3.5 min to 60% acetonitrile; hold for 3 min at 60%
acetonitrile; linear gradient for 6 s to 0% acetonitrile,
and equilibration for 15 min at 0% acetonitrile. The
eluted compound was monitored with a fluorescence
detector at 295 nm with the emission induced by ex-
citation at 250 nm.
ꢀ
20 min at 4 C (High Mac CR21), the supernatant was
used as a cell-free extract.
Step 2: Ammonium sulfate fractionation. The cell-
free extract was fractionated with solid ammonium
sulfate. The precipitate obtained at 70–80% ammonium
sulfate saturation was collected by centrifugation at
16;000 ꢁ g for 20 min (High Mac CR21) and then dis-
solved buffer A (15 ml). The enzyme solution (16 ml)
was dialyzed against 8 liters of buffer A for 12 h.
Step 3: Mono Q column chromatography. The dia-
lyzed enzyme solution was applied to a Mono Q HR 10/
10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala,
Sweden) equilibrated with buffer A. After it was washed
with buffer A, the enzyme was eluted with a linear
gradient of 1–0 M NaCl in 120 ml of buffer A. The active
fractions were combined (5.5 ml).
Step 4: Phenyl-Superose column chromatography.
After the addition of ammonium sulfate to 50% satu-
ration, the enzyme solution was applied to a phenyl-
Superose column, HR 5/5 (Amersham Pharmacia Bio-
tech), equilibrated with buffer A containing ammonium
sulfate (50% saturation) (buffer B). After the column
was washed with buffer B, the enzyme was eluted with a
linear gradient of ammonium sulfate, 50–0% saturation,
in 30 ml of buffer A. The active fractions were combined
Optimization of the reaction conditions for HIL
synthesis using resting cells of A. simplex AKU 626.
ꢀ
A. simplex AKU 626 was cultivated at 28 C with
shaking (120 strokes/min) in a 2-l shaking flask con-
taining 500 ml of medium B for 36–48 h. Five ml of the
culture broth was sampled and used for the reaction. The
reaction was carried out under the conditions described
under ‘‘Screening methods.’’ If necessary, the reaction
was terminated by the addition of 50 ml of 15% (v/v)
perchloric acid, and the solution was neutralized with
4
50 ml of 500 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
The effects of cultivation time, reaction time, reaction
pH, cofactors, and amino donors on HIL synthesis were
examined under the same conditions, except for the
condition tested.
(1.5 ml).
Step 5: Alkyl-Superose column chromatography. Af-
Stereoisomer analysis of HIL by liquid chromato-
graph mass spectrometer (LC–MS). Enzymatically
prepared HIL was reacted with AccQ-Tag fluorescence
derivatization reagent (Waters), and AccQ-Tag-derivat-
ed HIL was separated using a high pressure liquid
chromatograph, Alliance 2695 (Waters) equipped with
column LUNA C18 (150 ꢁ 2 mm, 3 mm; Phenomenex,
ter the addition of ammonium sulfate to 50% saturation,
the enzyme solution was applied to an alkyl-Superose
column, HR 5/5 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), equil-
ibrated with buffer B. After it was washed with buffer B,
the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of am-
monium sulfate, 50–0% saturation, in 30 ml of buffer A.
The fractions containing the enzyme activity (500 ml)
were concentrated to 50 ml by ultrafiltration with a
Centricon 10 (Amicon, Beverly, MA).
Step 6: Superdex 200 column chromatography. The
enzyme solution was applied to a Superdex 200 HR 10/
30 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated
with buffer A containing 200 mM NaCl (buffer C). The
enzyme was eluted with 40 ml of buffer C. The fractions
(0.5 ml) containing the enzyme activity were used for
further characterization.
ꢀ
Torrance, CA) at 26 C. The mobile phase contained
1
0 mM CH COONH at pH 6.8. The flow rate was 0.3
3 4
ml/min. Detection was performed by positive mode
electrospray ionization (ESI) in a Quattro-Micro tandem
quadrupole mass-spectrometer (Waters). The source
conditions were: capillary voltage, 2.0 kV; cone voltage,
ꢀ
2
0 V; source temperature, 119 C; dessolvation temper-
ꢀ
ature, 450 C; cone gas flow, 60 l/h; dessolvation gas
flow, 659 l/h.
Purification of the aldolase from A. simplex AKU