chemistry (PDCC), herein defined as the DCC, in which the
interconversion among equilibrating species is brought about
by electromagnetic irradiation instead of thermal bond-
breaking and bond-forming processes.8
Scheme 1. Photochemical Interconversion of the Two
Diastereoisomers cis- and trans-Thianthrene Dioxide (1)
Sulfoxides are attracting continuous attention for their
importance as bioactive compounds and drugs, as valuable
intermediates in organic synthesis, and as ligands for
asymmetric transformations.9 An attractive characteristic of
sulfoxides is their well-known stereochemical stability.
Consequently, experimental conditions leading to stereomu-
tation of sulfoxides and in particular photochemically induced
(direct or sensitized) racemization of enantiopure sulfoxides
are the object of intensive investigation.10,11 Stereomutation
of the sulfur center causes racemization in the absence of
other stereogenic centers, but diastereomeric interconversions
can occur in the presence of other chiral centers as found in
the photochemical studies of (S,R) sulfoxides of penicillin
derivatives.12 Very recently, axial to equatorial change in
1,9-dithiaalkane-bridged thianthrene 10-oxides was accom-
plished by photoinduced S-O configuration change.13
When two or more sulfinyl groups are present in the same
molecule, inversion of one of them leads to interconversion
among diastereomers. Accordingly, we felt it worthwhile to
analyze the photochemical interconversion of the two dias-
tereoisomeric cis- and trans-thianthrene dioxides (1) (Scheme
1). While the trans-1 isomer exists in two identical endo-
exo conformers, the cis-1 isomer exists in two conformers
of different stability, namely endo-endo and exo-exo. The
latter is less stable than the former by 11 kcal/mol and,
therefore, not appreciably populated at room temperature.14
To the best of our knowledge, inversion of configuration
of a tetrahedral stereogenic center, although potentially useful
to interconvert molecules with different properties, was never
used as a diversity source in DCC.
Upon UV irradiation (λ ) 280 nm) of a 3.0 mM solution
of trans-1 in C6D6, a partial isomerization to cis-1 was
observed by H NMR analysis (Figure 1a and Figure S1 in
1
Figure 1. Photoisomerization of thianthrene dioxide 1 (irradiation
at λ ) 280 nm) in C6D6 at 25 °C (a) starting from trans-1 and (b)
starting from cis-1.
the Supporting Information). The process occurs with the
absence of side products at short times, but after prolonged
irradiation (>120 min), partial deoxygenation15 of 1 to give
thianthrene oxide was observed (see the experimental details
in the Supporting Information). The photoisomerization
follows first-order kinetics with a rate constant (ktrans + kcis)
of 5.4 × 10-4 s-1. The reverse process (cis-1 f trans-1) is
also observed upon irradiation at 280 nm in C6D6 and shows
a very similar first-order rate constant (Figure 1b). The same
final photostationary ratio of diastereoisomers ([cis-1]/[trans-
1] ) 2.4) is obtained in both experiments.
Photoisomerization of trans-1 to cis-1 was also carried
out in different solvents (CD2Cl2, CD3CN, and CD3OD)
under continuous irradiation at 280 nm. In all cases,
isomerization follows a first-order process leading to a
solvent-dependent [cis-1]/[trans-1] ratio. Rate constants ktrans
and kcis and the pertinent [cis-1]/[trans-1] photoequilibrium
ratios are listed in Table 1.
(7) (a) Fuchs, B.; Nelson, A.; Star, A.; Stoddart, J. F.; Vidal, S. Angew.
Chem. 2003, 115, 4352–4356. (b) Cacciapaglia, R.; Di Stefano, S.;
Mandolini, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13666–13671. (c) Di Stefano,
S. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2010, 23, 797–805. (d) Berkovich-Berger, D.;
Lemcoff, N. G. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1686–1688.
(8) For a previous example of PDCC, see: Ingerman, A. L.; Waters,
M. L. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 111–117. Here the azobenzene light-induced
trans-cis inversion is used to interconvert the members of a dynamic li-
brary.
(9) (a) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5559–5601. (b) Legros, J.;
Dehli, J. R.; Bolm, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 19–31. (c) Bentley, R.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 609–624. (d) Fernandez, I.; Khiar, N. Chem.
ReV. 2003, 103, 3651–3705. (e) Carreno, M. C. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1717–
1760.
(10) (a) Vos, B. W.; Jenks, W. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2544–
2547. (b) Lee, W.; Jenks, W. S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 474–480. (c)
Tsurutani, Y.; Machida, S.; Horie, K.; Kawashima, Y.; Nakano, H.; Hirao,
K. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:Chem. 1999, 122, 161–168. (d) Guo, Y.;
Jenks, W. S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5480–5486. (e) Mislow, K.; Axelrod,
M.; Rayner, D. R.; Gotthardt, H.; Coyne, L. M.; Hammond, G. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 4958–4960
.
Since the UV spectra of cis-1 and trans-1 differ markedly
in the position and shape of the absorption bands (Figure
S2, Supporting Information),16 we analyzed the effect of
(11) (a) Aurisicchio, C.; Baciocchi, E.; Gerini, M. F.; Lanzalunga, O.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1939–1942. (b) Cooke, R. S.; Hammond, G. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2739–2745. (c) Mislow, K.; Axelrod, M.; Rayner,
D. R.; Gotthardt, H.; Coyne, L. M.; Cooke, R. S.; Hammond, G. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1969, 92, 2739–2745. (d) Cooke, R. S.; Hammond, G. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2958–2959
.
(15) (a) Korang, J.; Grither, W. R.; McCulla, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 4466–4476. (b) McCulla, R. D.; Jenks, W. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 16058–16065. (c) Gregory, D. D.; Wan, Z. H.; Jenks, W. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 94–102. (d) Thomas, K. B.; Greer, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1886–1891.
(12) (a) Spry, D. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5006–5008. (b) Archer,
R. A.; Kitchell, B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3462–3463.
(13) Suwabe, S.; Okuhara, A.; Sugahara, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kunimasa, K.;
Nakajima, T.; Kumafuji, Y.; Osawa, Y.; Yoshimura, T.; Morita, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1381–1384.
(16) Mislow, K.; Schneider, P.; Ternay, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964,
86, 2957–2958.
(14) Deubel, D. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2686–2691.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011
143