S. L. Collom et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 2344–2347
2345
Table 1
Solution-based oxidation of substrates 1–5 using Oxonea
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
MeO
MeO
OMe MeO
OMe
OMe
OH
1
2
3
4
O
O
MeO
OMe MeO
OMe
OMe
OMe
O
OH
O
5
6
7
Entry
Substrate
Oxone Eq
Co-solvent
Conversionb
4c
6
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
0.5
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
d4-MeOH
d6-Acetone
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
d3-ACN
17
26
55 (53)
81
67
55
4
<1
71
77
69
49 (54)
24
34
31
—
—
—
—
8
8
<1
4
6 (6)
6
2
2
—
—
12
—
2
3d
4
9 (10)
9
3
2
—
—
—
67
5
6
7
8
9
10e
2
89
a
b
c
20,22–24
Reaction conditions: 50
Conversion as percentage of starting material consumed.
l
mol substrate, 1 mL of 10% (v/v) co-solvent in D2O (9 mL), rt, 5 h. The reactions were monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy
(SI-1).
Selectivities are given as percentages. They are the average of at least two replicates and were determined using an internal standard (tBuOH) or external standard
(sodium trimethylsilylpropionate-d4). No oxidation of tBuOH was observed under standard reaction conditions.
d
Numbers in parenthesis were obtained when the reaction was degassed and run under inert (N2) atmosphere (SI-2).
Isolated yield after 15 min from a large scale reaction (see SI-5).
e
conversion to unknown products was seen, indicating that 4 is not
stable under the reaction conditions and that low conversion is
therefore required for high selectivity. There was no change in
the reaction product distribution when the oxidation was carried
out under air or N2 (entry 3 and SI-2), so O2 does not actively
participate.
The solution oxidation was repeated on a larger scale (100 mg)
using 2 equiv of Oxone (SI-4). After 5 h the organic products were
extracted with chloroform and subsequently purified on a silica
column. The recovered material consisted of 1 (41%), 4 (30%), and
6 (4%) based on the moles of starting material, demonstrating that
the reaction is scalable. The formation of 4 as the primary product
stands in contrast to reports of the solution oxidation of 1 using
oxidants such as nitric acid or hypervalent iodine reagents, which
typically form 2,6-dimethoxybenzoquinone 7.21,25–27 There is one
previous report of the formation of 4 from the oxidation of 1 using
m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid but the yield and selectivity were sig-
nificantly lower than reported in this work.21
To further investigate the reaction pathway and the scope of the
solution oxidation a number of substrates similar to 1 were tested
(entries 7–10, SI-1, and SI-5). Essentially no reaction was seen with
the less activated aromatics 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (2) or anisole
(3), even at elevated temperatures, indicating that a highly acti-
vated system is required. Reaction with 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenol
(5) was extremely rapid and after 15 min 6 was isolated from the
reaction mixture in a selectivity of 67%. If the reaction was left
for longer times no tractable products were observed. In contrast,
4 is relatively stable for 15 min under the same conditions. The sta-
bility of 4 as compared to 5 may account for the observed selectiv-
ity of the reaction for 4.
Mechanochemical oxidation was performed by manually grind-
ing 1 with 3 equiv of Oxone in a small mortar and pestle (SI-10).
The reaction was ground periodically for a total of 1 h per day for
14 days. After this time the organic solids were extracted with
CDCl3. 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated that the starting material
was selectively converted into 2,6-dimethoxybenzoquinone (6)
which was isolated in 73% yield, with no evidence of any other or-
ganic products. This result is in sharp contrast with the solution-
based reaction which gave 4 as major product, with high selectivity
only at low conversion.
The reaction was further screened using less labor-intensive
methods for mechanical activation. Using an automated mortar-
and-pestle mixer28 to grind the solids, after 7 h the only product
observed by NMR spectroscopy was again 6, however the overall
isolated yield (13–21%) was low (SI-10). A series of control exper-
iments (see SI-11) indicated that the organic components of the
reaction mixture, including both starting material 1 and product
6, partially volatilized during the reaction, reducing the yield. Vol-
atilization of the organics may be due to the intense localized heat-
ing associated with grinding.
To limit mass loss, a ball-mill with a closed capsule was used
(see SI-10). Full conversion of 1 was observed after 2 h, most likely
because the higher localized energy associated with ball-milling
compared to mortar grinding promotes faster reaction.1,29,30
Although the sealed vessels reduced the mass loss, the yields of 6
and 7 were only 19% and 8%, respectively, based on moles of start-
ing material. We believe that the low yields are due to the intense
heat generated in the ball mill (which could not be cooled) and the
best results were achieved by limiting the milling time to 15 min,
allowing the capsule to cool to room temperature before resuming
milling (see SI-10).
The shortcomings of the previously attempted mechanochemi-
cal procedures, that is, loss of mass by volatilization, and low selec-
tivity of high energy milling, were avoided by using a commercially
available rotary rock tumbler/polisher.31 We adapted this equip-
ment for a new mechanochemical procedure with the goal of
improving reproducibility and maximizing product recovery. Reac-
tion mixtures were enclosed in vials containing stainless steel mill-
ing balls (Fig. 1). The vials were then arranged in the drum of the
tumbler using foam spacers to secure the vials for the duration
of the reactions and mixed for 7 days (SI-7). This approach gave a
mass balance of >95% and the reaction was selective for 6 (Table 2).