In order to study the behaviour of poly(1), spectroelec-
trochemical experiments were performed. UV-vis spectral
changes monitored during anodic oxidation of poly(1) in
2 2 4 6
CH Cl + Bu NPF (0.2 M) are shown in Fig. 3. The electronic
spectrum of neutral poly(1) obtained as a thin film on an ITO
glass electrode showed two main bands at 350 and 426 nm, due
to the neutral spirobifluorene chains and ruthenium porphyrins,
respectively (Fig. 3, 0 V). We can also observe bands at 534 and
Fig. 4 Competitive reactions of carbene transfer (cyclopropanation/
sigmatropic rearrangement) with 1 or poly(1).
576 nm (Q bands) similar to those of the monomer (533 and 569
nm). After progressive oxidation to 0.54 V, all bands decrease
in intensity as a new well-defined band starts to grow in at 650
nm. These data suggest the formation of a transient species, the
ruthenium carbon monoxide porphyrin radical cation.11 This
band disappears rapidly which indicates a transformation of the
radical inside the polymer. The final oxidation product (1.24 V)
has a UV-vis spectrum with a broad peak at 524 nm and a
relatively low molar absorptivity compared to the neutral
polymer, which is characteristic of a polyspirobifluorene in its
p-doped state.12 As expected, the IR spectrum of poly(1)
rearrangement of the sulfur ylide.14 Poly(1) also15,16 catalysed
decomposition of ethyl diazoacetate in the presence of styrene
resulting in the formation of the corresponding cyclopropane in
85% yield with a large excess of the trans isomer (trans : cis
ratio: 9 : 1). Similar results were obtained with the monomer
(see supplementary material† for details). The recovery and
recyclability of poly(1) have also been examined, leading to 7
recycling steps without decrease of activity.
To test a possible regioselectivity of the polymer vs.
monomer, competitive catalytic carbene transfer was performed
with a 1 : 1 mixture of styrene and allyl methyl sulfide. With
complex 1, the sigmatropic : cyclopropanation reaction ratio
was about 65 : 35 whereas we detected an increase of the
sigmatropic rearangement with the poly(1) (78 : 22). In these
external competition experiments, a 10 : 1 substrate to diazo
ratio was used in order to avoid the formation of over-addition
products. A plausible explanation for this different regiose-
lectivity is the presence of a crowded environment in the
polymer which would restrict the approach of the aromatic
olefin. Electropolymerization of metalloporphyrins bearing
only one spirobifluorene group will open a new route to less
crowded active sites. Future studies will focus on developing
stereoselective versions of these reactions using chiral ruthe-
nium polymers.
2
1
showed a CO vibration at 1949 cm in KBr very close to the
2
1 11
value observed in the monomer (1939 cm ). Analysis of the
material using scanning electron microscopy and electronic
microanalysis gives a ratio C : Ru of about 120 : 1 in agreement
with a conserved structure of monomers in poly(1).
Following the successful synthesis of the Ru porphyrin
polymers, their catalytic activity was initially tested in carbene
transfer catalysis. The catalytic studies involved the use of
diazoethyl acetate as a possible carbene precursor with styrene
or methyl allyl sulfide as substrates. The activity of the polymer
catalyst was first focused on methyl allyl sulfide which has not
been frequently used in metalloporphyrin-catalyzed carbene
transfer reactions13 and the results were compared to those for
the corresponding soluble monomer 1. The reaction was
monitored by gas chromatography and carbene insertion was
found to be the major reaction in all cases. Treatment of methyl
allyl sulfide with ethyl diazoacetate at 25 °C in the presence of
the ruthenium polymer results in the formation of ethyl
Notes and references
1
C. A. McNamara, M. J. Dixon and M. Bradley, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102,
275.
F. Bedioui, J. Devynck and C. Bied-Charreton, Acc. Chem. Res., 1995,
8, 30.
2
-(methylthio)pent-4-enoate with 87% yield (Fig. 4). The
3
formation of this compound derives from the [2,3]-sigmatropic
2
2
3
4
A. Deronzier and J. C. Moutet, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1996, 147, 339.
C. Crestini and P. Tagliatesta, The Porphyrin Handbook, K. M. Kadish,
K. M. Smith, R. Guilard (Eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, 2000, Vol.
1
1, p. 161.
5
E. Rose, M. Quelquejeu, R. P. Pandian, A. Lecas-Nawrocka, A. Vilar,
G. Ricart, J. P. Collman, Z. Wang and A. Straumanis, Polyhedron, 2000,
1
9, 581.
6
7
8
G. Simonneaux and P. Le Maux, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 228, 43.
C. M. Che and J. S. Huang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 231, 151.
C. Poriel, Y. Ferrand, P. Le Maux, J. Rault-Berthelot and G.
Simonneaux, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1104.
9
C. Poriel, Y. Ferrand, P. Le Maux and G. Simonneaux, Synlett, 2003,
7
1.
1
0 D. P. Rillema, J. K. Nagle, L. F. Barringer and T. J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1981, 103, 56.
1
1
1 X. H. Mu and K. M. Kadish, Langmuir, 1990, 6, 51.
2 J. Rault-Berthelot, M. M. Granger and L. Mattiello, Synth. Met., 1998,
9
7, 211.
1
1
1
3 G. Simonneaux, E. Galardon, C. Paul-Roth, M. Gulea and S. Masson, J.
Organomet. Chem., 2001, 617–618, 360.
4 R. W. C. Cose, A. M. Davies, D. W. D. Ollis, C. Smith and I. O.
Sutherland, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1969, 293.
5 G. Du, B. Andrioletti, E. Rose and L. K. Woo, Organometallics, 2002,
21, 4490.
Fig. 3 Spectroelectrochemical experiments on poly(1) recorded from 0 V to
+
1
.7 V (reference Fc/Fc ).
16 M. Frauenkron and A. Berkessel, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 7175.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2308–2309
2309