J. Zhou et al. / Catalysis Today 149 (2010) 232–237
235
Table 1
The total energies of the intermediates and products (A.U.).
Intermediate A
Intermediate B
Intermediate C
TBMCE
2-TBC
4-TBC
ꢁ502.4111086
Energy
ꢁ502.7255049
ꢁ502.7314033
ꢁ502.7297011
ꢁ502.4040175
ꢁ502.4181119
and m is the index of the HOMO. This descriptor can be used to
predict the relative reactivity of the atoms in aromatic hydro-
carbons. For the alkylation in this study, a site with a relatively
larger Sr will result in a stronger orbital overlap, and then form a
more stable covalent bond between the [t-C4H9]+ and m-cresol.
The Sr values of m-cresol on the O1 and C atoms are shown in
Fig. 5. Among the C2, C4 and O1 sites, the Sr of C2 is the largest,
followed by C4 and O1. According to Sr, it can be deduced that a
stable covalent bond between the [t-C4H9]+ and m-cresol can be
formed in C2 site, followed by that in C4, and the new bond formed
in the O1 site cannot be as strong as that in C2 or C4 site. This
conclusion is in agreement with the stabilities of the intermediate
products and the final products. Through comparison of the total
energies of the optimized structures (see Table 1), it was found that
the total energies of the intermediate B and the intermediate C
were 15.5 kJ/mol and 11.0 kJ/mol lower than that of the inter-
mediate A, respectively, and the total energy of 2-TBC and 4-TBC
were 37.0 kJ/mol and 18.6 kJ/mol lower than that of TBMCE,
respectively. This means the stability orders among these species
were intermediate B > intermediate C > intermediate A and 2-
TBC > 4-TBC > TBMCE.The stereo-hindrance effect discussionAn-
other factor that might affect the product selectivity is the stereo-
hindrance effect on the different active sites of m-cresol. The O1
site stands out of the aromatic ring and is not hindered by any
other functional groups, while the C2 and C4 sites are influenced by
the hydroxyl and the methyl, respectively. So it can be deduced
that the stereo-hindrance effects on these sites are: C4 site > C2
site > O1 site.
product TBMCE quickly. This is in agreement with the experi-
mental result that a large amount of TBMCE was formed at the
early stage of the reaction. However, intermediate A is not very
stable due to the weak orbital overlap effect in O1 site in spite of its
easy formation. Moreover, the O1 atom in TBMCE still takes a high
negative charge (ꢁ0.716) and is prone to being attracted by a
positive group, such as H+. This would result in a reversible
reaction between intermediate A and TBMCE. The geometry-
optimization results show that when a H+ approaches the O1 of
TBMCE, the distance between the O1 and the butyl-C of the [t-
C4H9]+ increases from 1.511 A to 1.614 A. This means that the [t-
C4H9]+ tends to leave and may rearrange to form intermediate B
and intermediate C. But the reverse reactions of the intermediates
to produce 2-TBC and 4-TBC are very difficult as the atomic net
charges of the C2 and C4 atoms are too low to interact with H+ ions.
According to the experimental and computational results above,
a mechanism for the selective alkylation of m-cresol with tert-
butanol can be proposed, as shown in Scheme 1. The electrophilic
interaction of the [t-C4H9]+ with the hydroxyl group or the C2 and C4
atomsof m-cresol results in the formation of the products TBMCE, 2-
TBC and 4-TBC through intermediates A, B and C, respectively.
However, due to the higher electron density and the less stereo-
hindrance effect on the O1 atom, the formations of intermediate A
and the final product TBMCE are easy and fast, but they are not
stable. There is a reversible reaction between intermediate A and
TBMCE, so the TBMCE can reverse to intermediate A and that can
rearrange to intermediate B or C with B preferred due to its good
stability and short distance between O1 and C2 sites. With
increasing reaction time intermediates B and C are consumed
gradually by further reactions, and they will mainly be comple-
mented by the rearrangement of intermediate A formed by the
recombination of TBMCE and H+. This reaction chain will speed up
the reverse reaction from TBMCE to intermediate A. As a result, the
kinetically preferred O-alkylated product (TBMCE) disappears
gradually. Amongthoseproducts, 2-TBC, 4-TBCandTBMCEproducts
are all primary products, and 2,6-DTBC product is a second product
which is derived from 2-TBC. Between the two C-alkylated products,
2-TBC is the thermodynamically preferred product at the end.
Because of the stronger orbital conjugation and the Coulombic
interaction and the weaker stereo-hindrance effect of the [t-C4H9]+
with m-cresol on the C2 site than on the C4 site.
˚
˚
4.5. Mechanism discussion
From the analysis above, it is clear that each active site on m-
cresol has its particularity in the fundamental natures of the
Coulomb force, the orbital distribution and the stereo-hindrance
effect. Considering the higher negative charge and the weaker
stereo-hindrance effect on the O1 site, it is postulated that the
[t-C4H9]+ is more prone to interacting with the O1 atom in m-cresol
via an electrophilic effect, forming intermediate A and then the
4.6. The catalytic function of the ionic liquid
For this reaction, besides the key steps of the [t-C4H9]+
electrophilically adsorbing on the O1, C2 and C4 sites of m-cresol
and the formation the intermediates, other steps, such as the
departure of the hydroxyl group (–OHꢁ) from TBA to form the [t-
C4H9]+, or the removal of H+ from the intermediates and then the
generation of the final products, are also critical. The IL plays an
important role in these important steps. The optimized geometries
and the atomic charges of the cation and the anion of IL are shown
in Fig. 6. The O atoms take on negative charges and the S and H (H4,
H5) bear positive charges. In order to break the C7–O5 bond (see
Fig. 7) in TBA, it is helpful to have an electrophilic group to bond
with the O5 atom so that it can attract the electron and weaken the
C7–O5 bond. We have tried to conjugate H4 (in cation), H5 and S1
(in anion) with O5 (in TBA) in the initial-structure hypothesizers,
but the optimized structures shows that only the H4–O5
Fig. 5. The Sr values of m-cresol on the O1 and C atoms.