1206
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 54, No. 5, May, 2005
Leibzon et al.
mainly at the free oꢀnitro group of the RA, which should
increase the content of isomer 1 over 2.
the acceleration of the reaction and its regioselectivity.
Therefore, we believe that the acceleration of the process
can be related to the formation of a complex of the nitro
compound with metal ions and their higher reduction rate
(mechanism III), and the change in regioselectivity is
caused by the reaction occurrence via mechanisms II and
(in part) III. A higher complexing ability of an RA comꢀ
pared to neutral nitro compounds should result in a change
in regioselectivity at rather low concentrations of metal
ions when their influence on the kinetics of the process is
relatively low.
III. Formation of a complex between a metal ion and
the starting nitro compound. In this case, the electron
transfer to this complex produces the same complex
RA•М2+ as that via mechanism II after complex formaꢀ
tion of the RA with metal ions. Mechanisms II and III are
presented in Scheme 1 for TNT, where M2+ is a metal ion
(iron(II) or copper(II)), and the reaction products are mixꢀ
tures of isomers 1 and 2 of different compositions formed
by the protonation of the RA and RA complexes with the
metal ions, respectively.
Finally, we would like to mention an analogy of the
phenomenon considered to the reduction of PNC by hyꢀ
drazine hydrate or using catalytic hydrogenation. In the
absence of iron compounds, the reduction of
aromatic PNC using these methods affords mainly
paraꢀisomers,18,19 whereas the amount of orthoꢀisomers
increases sharply in the presence of iron hydroxide or iron
salts.18 As shown above, the copper salt exerts a similar
effect on the regioselectivity of reduction by the titaꢀ
nium(III) ions. However, this effect is stronger than in the
case when the iron salt is used. Although the mechanisms
of the compared methods differ, the orthoꢀorienting inꢀ
fluence of the copper compounds on catalytic hydrogenaꢀ
tion or reduction by hydrazine cannot be excluded.
To conclude, we found that the regioselectivity of TNT
reduction with titanium(III) or vanadium(II) ions in
the presence of the iron(II) salts can be varied in a wide
range.
According to Scheme 1, an increase in the concentraꢀ
tion of the bivalent metal ions in a solution should be
accompanied by an increase in the concentration of RA
complexes with such cations, whose protonation yields a
mixture of isomers with a higher content of compound 1.
The curves of the dependence of the isomeric composiꢀ
tion of the reduction products on the metal ion concenꢀ
tration reach a limit (see Figs 1 and 2) corresponding to
the predominant occurrence of the process via route b.
A change in the regioselectivity of reduction is much more
sensitive to the presence of iron(II) ions in the solution
than the acceleration of the process by these ions. In
particular, the isomeric composition of the reduction
products of TNT by the titanium(III) ions stops deꢀ
pending on the concentration of the latter exceeding
0.01 mol L–1 (see Fig.1, curve 1). At the same time, for a
given concentration of the iron ions, the process rate
increases twofold, while the 6—8ꢀfold acceleration of the
reduction needs very high concentrations of the iron ions:
This work was financially supported by the Division of
Chemistry and Materials Sciences of the Russian Acadꢀ
emy of Sciences.
0.2—0.3 mol L–1 9,10
This difference in character of the
.
dependence of the reduction acceleration and regioꢀ
selectivity of the process on the metal ion concentration
can indicate differences in mechanisms of these pheꢀ
nomena.
References
1. S. A. Shevelev, A. Kh. Shakhnes, B. I. Ugrak, and S. S.
Vorob´ev, Synth. Commun., 2001, 31, 2557.
2. V. N. Leibzon, A. P. Churilina, M. Yu. Leonova,
L. V. Mikhal´chenko, and A. Kh. Shakhnes, Elektrokhim.,
2000, 36, 190 [Russ. J. Electrochem., 2000, 36 (Engl.
Transl.)].
3. I. I. Bilkis and V. D. Shteingarts, Zh. Org. Khim., 1982, 18,
359 [J. Org. Chem. USSR, 1982, 18 (Engl. Transl.)].
4. I. I. Bilkis, V. V. Goidin, S. I. Uskov, and V. D. Shteingarts,
Zh. Org. Khim., 1991, 27, 24 [J. Org. Chem. USSR, 1991, 27
(Engl. Transl.)].
5. A. T. Nielsen, R. A. Henry, W. P. Norris, R. A. Atkins,
D. W. Moore, and A. H. Hepil, J. Org. Chem., 1979,
44, 2499.W
6. R. Schroter and F. Moller, in Methoden der Organischen
Chemie (HoubenꢀWeil), Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart—
New York, 1957, 11, Teil 1, 474.
7. I. I. Bilkis, S. I. Uskov, and V. D. Shteingarts, Izv. Sib. Otd.
Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. [Bull. Siberian Branch Acad.
Sci. USSR], 1987, 3, 111 (in Russian).
The reactions of TNT (or its complex with metal ions)
with the titanium(III) ions are presented in Scheme 1 as
irreversible, although the redox electron transfer processes
can be reversible. In our opinion, under the experimental
conditions (acidic aqueousꢀalcohol solutions), protonaꢀ
tion rates of RA (or their complexes) are so high that their
concentration in a solution is very low, and these reacꢀ
tions should be virtually irreversible. However, in this
case, the acceleration of reduction via mechanism II canꢀ
not be explained, because RA complexes with metal ions
are formed after the irreversible reaction. At the same
time, the complex formation of a nitro compound with
metal ions followed by the electron transfer via mechaꢀ
nism III makes it possible to explain both the acceleration
of reduction and the change in regioselectivity of the proꢀ
cess in the presence of the iron(II) or copper(II) ions.
However, this mechanism does not explain the aforeꢀ
mentioned difference in influence of the metal ions on