1
0048
6
J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 10048-10051
Efficien t Syn th esis of 4-, 5-, a n d
-Meth yl-2,2′-bip yr id in e by a Negish i
2 2 3 3
TMS derivative with BrF CCF Br or Cl CCCl in the
presence of CsF provided the bromide or chloride cleanly
and in high yield. These 4,4′-bis(halomethyl)-2,2′-bipy-
ridines and their metal complexes were utilized by us as
Cr oss-Cou p lin g Str a tegy F ollow ed by
High -Yield Con ver sion to Br om o- a n d
Ch lor om eth yl-2,2′-bip yr id in es
9
initiators for living polymerization reactions. To further
explore the use of metal complexes as templates for
polymerization initiators, it was also of interest to
prepare monofunctional halomethyl bipyridines. More-
over, we wanted to determine the generality of the TMS
methodology for methyl bpys with different substitution
patterns.10 Anions of 4- and 6-methyl bpy possess reso-
nance structures with formal negative charges on elec-
tronegative nitrogen atoms on the same ring. For the
anion of 5-methyl bpy, similar stabilization is achieved
only through delocalization onto the adjacent heteroaro-
matic ring. We were curious to see whether this differ-
ence might correlate with differences in reactivity for the
methyl bpy derivatives.
Scott A. Savage, Adam P. Smith, and
Cassandra L. Fraser*
Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Received J uly 29, 1998
In tr od u ction
Bipyridine ligands and their many complexes find wide
1
application in chemistry. These nitrogen heterocycles are
common in studies of electron transfer in proteins and
2
3
small molecules, in supramolecular assembly, and in
4
sensing and recognition. They also play a central role
Monofunctional bipyridine reagents may be accessed
from monomethyl bpy starting materials. As the vast
literature documenting many alternative routes to these
compounds attests, efficient synthesis of these unsym-
metrical bipyridines represents a long-standing challenge
in the field.11 Traditionally, methyl bpys have been
prepared by the Kr o¨ nke method which involves reaction
of pyridinium salts with R,â-unsaturated ketones fol-
lowed by treatment with ammonium acetate to effect
as ligands for copper catalysts in new living radical
5
polymerization methodologies. Despite their prevalence,
many desirable bipyridine (bpy) derivatives have long
proven elusive. Until recently many of the halomethyl
bipyridines were only obtainable in low to moderate
yields. Common approaches to these compounds include
radical halogenation which can give rise to mixtures of
6
products that are difficult to separate or preparation via
cyclization.12 They have also been made by coupling of
alcohol precursors which are accessed by a multistep
synthesis from the methyl precursors.6 Recently we
introduced a new and highly efficient approach to the
halogenation of dimethyl bipyridines.8 Specifically, 4,4′-
dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine was deprotonated with lithium
diisopropylamide (LDA) followed by trapping with trim-
ethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl). Reaction of the resulting bis-
,7
6b,13
pyridyllithium reagents with pyridyl sulfoxides,
by Ni
1
4
and other metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, by
the Ullman reaction, and, more recently, by use of
,9a
12
R-oxoketene dithioacetals among a variety of other
routes.15 Many methods lead to mixtures of isomers or
they also produce dimethyl byproducts. Some approaches
require rather involved multistep syntheses and harsh
conditions, few methods are general for different substi-
tution patterns, and nearly all of them produce products
in moderate yields, at best. Though modern palladium-
catalyzed cross-coupling strategies require an expensive
(
1) See the following and references therein: (a) J uris, A.; Balzani,
V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zelewsky, A. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85. (b) Sauvage, J .-P.; Collin, J .-P.; Chambron,
J .-C.; Guillerez, S.; Coudret, C.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; De Cola,
L.; Flamigni, L. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 993. (c) Balzani, V.; J uris, A.;
Venturi, M.; Campagna, S.; Serroni, S. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 759.
(
2) (a) Benniston, A. C.; Mackie, P. R.; Harriman, A. Angew. Chem.,
(10) During the course of our investigations, it was demonstrated
that the TMS to halide methodology extends to 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-
bipyridine which was used to generate 6,6′-bis(bromomethyl)-2,2′-
bipyridine in good yield. Hochwimmer, G.; Nuyken, O.; Schubert, U.
S. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1998, 19, 309.
8
Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 354 (b) Skov, L. K.; Pascher, T.; Winkler, J .
R.; Gray, H. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1102. (c) Gray, H. B.;
Winkler, J . R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 537. (b) Dandliker, P.
J .; Holmlin, R. E.; Barton, J . K. Science 1997, 275, 1465.
(
3) (a) Boulas, P. L.; Gomez-Kaifer, M.; Echegoyen, L. Angew. Chem.,
(11) Another common route to monofunctional bipyridines involves
monosubstitution of dimethyl bipyridine reagents. This approach is
often complicated by over- or underfunctionalization and separation
of desirable products from starting material and byproducts can be
Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 216. (b) Mamula, O.; von Zelewsky, A.;
Bernardinelli, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 290. (c) Kaes,
C.; Hosseini, M. W.; Rickard, C. E. F.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 920.
6
a
troublesome. Our attempts to access monofunctional bpy derivatives
(
4) (a) Beer, P. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 71. (b) Chin, T.; Gao,
in this manner involved reaction of commercially available 4,4′-
6
a
Z.; Lelouche, I.; Shin, Y.-G. K.; Purandare, A.; Knapp, S.; Isied, S. S.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12849.
dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine with 0.95 equiv of LDA followed by quench-
ing with TMSCl. After varying reaction conditions and reagent
loadings, in all cases mixtures of the desired product, the difunctional
TMS compound, and the dimethyl starting material were obtained.
These species proved difficult to separate by either chromatography
or recrystallization (Krause, B.; Fraser, C. L. Unpublished results).
Monolithiation followed by reaction with electrophiles has been suc-
cessful in some cases (e.g., with aldehydes). See: Beer, P. D.; Kocian,
R. J .; Mortimer, R. J .; Ridgway, C. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993,
2629. Other approaches take advantage of the limited solubility of
(5) For a recent review see: Matyjaszewski, K., Ed. Controlled
Radical Polymerizations; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC,
1
998.
(6) (a) Chiana, L. D.; Hamachi, I.; Meyer, T. J . J . Org. Chem. 1989,
5
4, 4, 1731. (b) Uenishi, J .; Tanaka, T.; Nishiwaki, K.; Wakabayashi,
S.; Oae, S.; Tsukube, H. J . Org. Chem 1993, 58, 4382.
7) (a) Newkome, G. R.; Puckett, W. E.; Kiefer, G. E.; Gupta, V. K.;
(
Xia, Y.; Coreil, M.; Hackney, M. A. J . Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4116. (b)
Newkome, G. R.; Kiefer, G. E.; Kohli, D. K.; Xia, Y.-J .; Fronczek, F.
R.; Baker, G. R. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5105. (c) Imperiali, B.; Prins,
T. J .; Fisher, S. L. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1613.
1
5b
monofunctionalized intermediates.
(12) Kr o¨ hnke, F. Synthesis 1976, 1.
(13) Kawai, T.; Furukawa, N.; Oae, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
(
8) Fraser, C. L.; Anastasi, N. R.; Lamba, J . J . S. J . Org. Chem. 1997,
2549.
6
2, 9314.
(14) Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Tingoli, M.; Chianelli, D.; Montanucci,
M. Synthesis 1984, 736 and references therein.
(9) (a) Lamba, J . J . S.; Fraser, C. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
1
801. (b) Lamba, J . J . S.; McAlvin, J . E.; Peters, B. P.; Fraser, C. L
(15) (a) Potts, K. T.; Winslow, P. A. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5405
and references therein. (b) For other approaches to unsymmetrical bpys
see: Newkome, G. R.; Gross, J .; Patri, A. K. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
3013 and references therein.
Polym. Prepr. 1997, 38(1), 193. (c) Collins, J . E.; Lamba, J . J . S.; Love,
J . C.; McAlvin, J . E.; Peters, B. P.; Fraser, C. L. Manuscript submitted.
(d) Collins, J . E.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 6715.
1
0.1021/jo981505z CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/10/1998