Houston et al.
verified for multinuclear molecules such as these, the new
experimental data clearly indicate a change in mechanism.
Using his semiempirical model [Associative (A) ) ∆Vq ≈
-13; Interchange (I) ) ∆Vq ≈ 0; or Dissociative (D) ) ∆Vq
≈ +13], the water exchange mechanism changes from D or
Id (Mo32+) to Ia (W32+), which is consistent with other
distinctly different activation parameters, [Mo32+: ∆Hq )
126 kJ mol-1, ∆Sq ) 77 J mol-1 K-1; and for W32+: ∆Hq )
58 kJ mol-1, ∆Sq ) -164 J mol-1 K-1].21 These volumes
represent the largest difference in ∆Vq values (∼10 cm3
mol-1) for any two isostructural 4d-5d and 3d-4d metal
species located within the same group, and based on their
different magnitudes, demonstrate a unique mechanistic
changeover.30 These data may become as useful as the
changeover in mechanism for octahedral first row transition
metal ions that has served as a reliable test case for computer
simulations.31,32
Figure 4. Volumes of activation and entropies for water exchange from
multinuclear metal complexes. The data presented above are from this work
and refs 16-18. Two points are plotted for the Rh24+ cluster corresponding
to separate rates for the bound waters that are cis and trans to the µ2-OH
bridge.
For isoelectronic metal ions with the same coordination
geometry, as is the case for Mo32+ and W32+, the size of the
metal ion dictates the activation pathway. Large ions typically
have more room for association with the entering molecule.15
Unfortunately, however, Mo(IV) and W(IV) ionic radii for
nonacoordination, as in these trimeric molecules, are not
available to compare. We anticipate that ionic radii for the
nine-coordinate Mo(IV) and W(IV) would be similar to one
another because of the lanthanide contraction. For example,
these metals in hexacoordination have ionic radii of 65 and
66 pm, respectively, for Mo(IV) and W(IV).33 The local
structures around each of the metal ions are also similar and
do not immediately suggest a reason that one pathway would
be considerably more dissociative than the other. For
example, the angle between µ-O2CCH3 and the η-OH2 [e.g.,
(CH3CO)O-M-O(OH2)] for both molecules is roughly
75°,28,34 as estimated from crystal data. Although crowding
around the metal center would inhibit attack by the incoming
ligand and lead to a more dissociative activation state, we
the coordinated ligands have greater negative NBO charge
in W32+ versus Mo32+ [Mo32+: H3CCOO ) -0.672/-0.640,
H2O ) -0.871; W32+: H3CCOO ) -0.677/-0.713, H2O
) -0.899). These data indicate a larger degree of charge
separation in the W32+ cluster and thus greater bond polarity.
We speculate that this greater charge separation stabilizes
the incoming water molecule during the formation of the
transition-state complex, resulting in a more associatively
activated pathway for W32+. A comprehensive and detailed
computational study aimed to simulate the activation barrier
for both molecules is currently underway.
The reactivity trends that we observe here for the trinuclear
clusters are qualitatively consistent with trends evident in
the 4d-5d group monomeric aqua ions. Exchange mecha-
nisms for monomeric ions become increasingly associative
deeper in the 4d-5d group.15 For example, water exchange
3+
2+
becomes more associative for the larger Ir(OH2)6 vs the
only see evidence for a dissociative pathway for the Mo3
cluster, yet crowding is similar in the W3 molecule.
3+
2+
slightly smaller Rh(OH2)6 ion (Rh(III) ) 0.665 Å, Ir(III)
) 0.680 Å)33 based on the reported activation volumes (∆Vq
) -4.2 and -5.7 cm3 mol-1, respectively).5,6 As another
example, albeit not for octahedral ions, the activation volume
for [Pt(OH2)4]2+ (∆Vq ) -4.6 cm3 mol-1) is more negative
than that of [Pd(OH2)4]2+ (∆Vq ) -2.2 cm3 mol-1),37,38 even
though the ionic radius of Pt(II) is smaller (Pd(II) ) 0.64
Å, Pt(II) ) 0.60 Å).33 These examples demonstrate an
increase in associative character as one goes deeper into the
group, but not a drastic change in mechanism, such as we
find here for the trinuclear clusters.
The profound difference in mechanism for these otherwise
similar molecules suggests that they might be well suited
for simulation,31,32,35 which we have underway. Preliminary
data from DFT calculations (B3LYP/LANL2DZ)36 indicate
a difference in bonding character from the metal centers to
the ligands for the Mo32+ and W32+ clusters in their ground
states. The NBO charges at the tetravalent metal are
significantly different for the two clusters; the NBO charge
on W(IV) is slightly greater than Mo(IV) [Mo(IV) ) +1.424;
W(IV) ) +1.698]. Correspondingly, the oxygen atoms in
Most importantly, there are now enough high-pressure 17
O
NMR data to establish mechanistic trends for several
multinuclear aqueous complexes. The data compiled in
Figure 4 show that activation volumes for water exchange
correlate linearly with the corresponding activation entropies.
Similar trends have been previously found for water ex-
(30) Helm, L.; Merbach, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 5, 633-
641.
(31) Rotzinger, F. P. HelV. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 3006-3020.
(32) Rotzinger, F.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5230-5238.
(33) Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1976, 32, 751-767.
(34) Bino, A.; Hesse, K. F.; Kueppers, H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1980,
B36, 723-725.
(35) (a) Stack, A. G.; Rustad, J. R.; Casey, W.H J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,
109, 23771-23775. (b) Rotzinger, F. P. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2003-
2037.
(37) Helm, L.; Elding L. I.; Merbach, A. E. HelV. Chim. Acta 1984, 67,
1453-60.
(36) Glendening, E. D.; Weinhold, F. J. Comp. Chem. 1998, 19, 610-
(38) Helm, L.; Elding L. I.; Merbach A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1719-
627.
21.
7966 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 19, 2006