M. Ravera et al. / Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 150 (2015) 1–8
5
progressive disappearance of its ESI-MS peaks, without the appearance
of new peaks indicative of the formation of soluble adducts with Pt.
The formation of adducts with “naked” Pt was already observed in
the case of direct reaction between cisplatin and apoMets7 or apoMnk1
[32,46]. In contrast, in the case of oxaliplatin, that contains the more sta-
ble chelating cyclohexane-1R,2R-diamine (dach) ligand, the “Pt(dach)”
moiety was maintained intact after interaction with the model proteins
[47]. For this reason a complex similar to 1, but containing the dach
ligand in place of the two ammine molecules (namely trans,cis,cis-
[Pt(acetato)2Cl2(dach)]) was tested in a similar experiment. Similarly
to the case of 1, no direct reaction took place with both model proteins.
However, after reduction with sodium ascorbate, the reaction with
apoMets7 showed decrease of the starting apo protein (complete
disappearance after 48 h) and concomitant increase of peaks corre-
sponding to {Mets7 + Pt(dach)2+} (doubly charged adduct, m/z
596.71) and {Mets7H+ + Pt(dach)2+} (triply charged adduct, m/z
398.15) (Fig. S1, see the Supplementary data). When Mnk1 was reacted
with trans,cis,cis-[Pt(acetato)2Cl2(dach)], previously reduced with
sodium ascorbate, a slight precipitation of protein occurred. However,
in this case, it was possible to observe, already after about 3 h of incuba-
tion, the appearance of new signals corresponding to adduct formation
between the protein and {Pt(dach)Cl}+ or {Pt(dach)}2+ moieties. With
time the intensity of signals corresponding to the monodentate
adduct {Mnk1–[Pt(dach)Cl]+} {Mnk1–[Pt(dach)Cl]+} (m/z 1097.55)
decreased while the signals corresponding to the bidentate adduct
{Mnk1–[Pt(dach)]2+} (m/z 1101.78) increased (Fig. S2, see the Supple-
mentary data). This two-step reaction mechanism is peculiar of Mnk1
[46].
pinocytosis. Cellular accumulation affects the activity of cisplatin: a de-
crease in Pt accumulation, due either to decrease in uptake or increase
in efflux, is one of the main causes of chemoresistance [51,52].
Instead of using the cellular Pt accumulation (ng of Pt per 106 cells),
the accumulation ratio (AR), a concept similar to the “accumulation
grade of factor” previously defined by Gust et al. [53], was employed
in the present paper. AR is the dimensionless ratio between the cellular
Pt concentration (taking into account the experimentally measured cell
volume) and the extracellular Pt concentration (i.e. the actual concen-
tration of Pt in the culture medium) [11].
The AR value of 1–4 and cisplatin (all employed at 10 μM concentra-
tion) was measured in A2780 cells after i) 4 h CT, ii) 24 h CT, and iii) 4 h
CT followed by 20 h R in fresh, drug-free complete medium. In the case
of Pt(IV) complexes, all AR values increase with log Po/w, as well as with
the length of the axial carbon chains, as expected for passively diffusing
molecules [40].
As shown in Table 1, the AR of cisplatin increased from 4 h CT to 24 h
CT. However, cisplatin accumulation significantly dropped when, after
4 h CT, the incubation was prolonged in drug-free medium for further
20 h (4 h CT + 20 h R), indicating an extensive, albeit incomplete, efflux
process.
Also in the case of complexes 1–3, the AR progressively increased
when the CT was prolonged up to 24 h. On the contrary, the AR of 4
was quite similar (p N 0.05, two-sample t-test) in the three experimen-
tal conditions (i.e. AR ≅ 50). This saturation plateau suggests a limit in
the storing of 4 within the viable cells.
The effect of recovery is different for the four Pt(IV) complexes. Sim-
ilarly to cisplatin, the less lipophilic compounds 1 and 2 show a signifi-
cant decrease in AR upon incubation in drug-free medium, whereas the
AR value is substantially maintained for 3 and 4.
Data in Table 1 also show that, for a given incubation time, the AR in-
creases in the following order: 1 b cisplatin ≤ 2 b 3 b 4. The diacetato 1
and the dibutanoato 2 exhibit an AR lower than and equal to that of cis-
platin, respectively. It is possible to hypothesize that for 1 and 2 the lack
of influx protein-mediated transport (e.g. Ctr1, operating for cisplatin
[32], but not for intact Pt(IV) complexes) is not fully compensated by
the increase in passive diffusion (the only uptake process occurring for
Pt(IV) derivatives) due to their modest lipophilicity, whereas the oppo-
site is true for 3 and, especially, for 4.
The decrease in AR observed for cisplatin during recovery is related
to the already described efflux transporters. Previous studies demon-
strated that intact cisplatin is the predominant species in the cytosolic
low molecular weight fraction, but it is nearly completely cleared
upon 1 h of recovery by means of extrusion through the P-type
copper-transporters [54]. The remaining fraction is mainly sequestered
by the sulfur proteins, GSH [55], and by other high MW molecules (i.e.
RNA). However, since platinum adducts are slowly extruded from the
cells [56,57], the total amount of accumulated Pt increases with the du-
ration of the contact time (from 4 to 24 h CT). Moreover, a significant
amount of Pt remains inside the cells also during the recovery period.
Since Pt(IV) complexes act as prodrugs for cisplatin [17], it is
intended that reduction products undergo the same fate as cisplatin it-
self. As far as Pt(IV) complexes are not a substrate for the extruding cop-
per transporter, the accumulated total Pt should be the net result
between the Pt(IV) uptake and the efflux of the Pt(II) metabolites. Ac-
cording to previous 13C NMR and X-ray absorption near edge spectros-
copy (XANES) studies performed on A2780 cells for 1 [6,58], Pt(IV)
complexes are significantly reduced to cisplatin within 4 h and
completely reduced after 24 h. Complexes 2–4 showed similar reduc-
tion kinetics than 1 when challenged with AA at physiological pH [40].
Therefore, it is conceivable that during the recovery period, platinum
detoxification mainly involves the Pt(II) metabolites. Unfortunately,
ICP-MS determines only the total amount of Pt, without distinguishing
between its oxidation states. Noteworthy, when the initial AR of
Pt(IV) compounds was similar to that of cisplatin, also the efflux had a
similar efficiency; on the contrary, for compounds with high AR (i.e. 3
In conclusion, the reported experiments suggest that Pt(IV) com-
plexes, differently from Pt(II) complexes, are not substrates for copper
transporters strengthening the idea that they enter the cells by passive
diffusion.
3.2. Lipophilicity and cellular accumulation of 1–4 complexes on A2780 cell
line
Cellular accumulation represents the balance at a given time be-
tween cellular influx and efflux and is an important factor determining
the biological activity of any drug [48]. The lipophilicity of a drug is a key
feature directly related to its ability to passively cross cellular mem-
branes [49,50]. Generally, the shake-flask log Po/w, in which n-octanol
is taken as a model of the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and water
mimics the extracellular environment, is used to represent the lipophi-
licity of a molecule. The log Po/w values of complexes 1–4 are reported
in Table 1, along with that of cisplatin. Even for such a limited number
of compounds, it is possible to observe a linear relationship between
log Po/w and the number of carbon atoms in the chain of axial ligands
[16,21].
The mechanism by which the prototype cisplatin permeates cells is
certainly multifactorial, as a result of a series of different processes
such as passive diffusion, carrier-mediated transport and, possibly,
Table 1
AR of A2780 cells treated with 10 μM concentration of the platinum complexes. Data are
means standard deviations of at least 3 independent replicates and were compared to
those obtained for each drug after 4 h CT by means of the two sample t-test (*p b
0.05;**p b 0.01; ***p b 0.001; NS = value not statistically different from control sample).
Compound
log Po/w
Accumulation ratio, AR
4 h CT
4 h CT + 20 h R
24 h CT
Cisplatin
−2.27a
−1.92b
−0.39b
1.14b
1.4 0.6
0.3 0.1
2.3 0.8
20.7 4.6
41.0 8.5
0.7 0.2 (*)
0.08 0.02 (**)
1.8 0.2 (*)
15.2 3.0 (NS)
46.8 9.1 (NS)
4.5 1.1 (***)
0.7 0.2 (**)
16.3 5.6 (***)
53.0 16.9 (***)
59.6 14.7 (NS)
1
2
3
4
4.1b
a
From Ref. [22].
From Ref. [40].
b