Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Paper
as a result of the title reaction, 1.0 ml of the nal reaction
solution was used for the GC measurements. The concentration
of methanol was calculated by integrating the peak area for the
characteristic methanol band in the chromatogram (Fig. S8†).
Blank control experiments were conducted to ensure that
methanol production was due to the photoreduction of CO2,
and to eliminate the surrounding interference. One blank test
was carried out by illuminating the solution in the absence of
the photocatalyst, and another was performed in the dark using
a photocatalyst under identical experimental conditions. An
additional blank test was performed by illuminating the reac-
tion mixture in the presence of the photocatalyst by using N2
rather than CO2. No product was detected in the above three
blank tests even aer longer periods of exposure.
Synthesis of ruthenium trinuclear complex
[{(bpy)2Ru(bpm)]2RuCl2$4PF6}] 1 28
In a typical experiment, [Ru(bpy)2(bpm)](PF6)2 (0.865 mmol),
RuCl3$3H2O (0.4605 mmol) and LiCl (4.715 mmol) were taken
in a 100 ml round-bottomed ask and then ethanol was added
(100 ml). The resulting mixture was reuxed with stirring for 24
h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was
cooled to room temperature and then a saturated solution of
NH4PF6 was added to precipitate complex 1. For purication,
the obtained complex was dissolved in the minimum amount of
acetone and re-precipitated with diethyl ether. Further puri-
cation was done by column chromatography using alumina as
the stationary phase and toluene–acetonitrile (v/v, 2 : 1) as a
mobile phase. UV-Vis absorbance was found at l max 425 nm
and 260 nm. ESI-MS: 1827 [M+ ꢁ 2Clꢁ + 2H+], 1745 [M+ ꢁ PF6 ꢁ
6H+], 1583 [M+ ꢁ 2PF6 ꢁ Fꢁ], 1423 [M+ ꢁ 3PF6 ꢁ Clꢁ ꢁ 3H+] and
1314[M+ ꢁ 4PF6 ꢁ 2H+]. 1H and 13C NMR and ESI-MS spectra of
the synthesized complex are shown in the ESI (Fig. S3–S6†).
Notes and references
1 (a) A. J. Morris, G. J. Meyer and E. Fujita, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2009, 42, 1983; (b) R. Reithmeier, C. Bruckmeier and
B. Rieger, Catalysts, 2012, 2, 544–571; (c) S. Naval,
A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. lvaro and H. Garcia,
ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 562–577.
2 (a) S. N. Habisreutinger, L. Schmidt-Mende and
J. K. Stolarczyk, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7372–
7408; (b) Y. Ku, W.-H. Lee and W.-Y. Wang, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2004, 212, 191–196; (c) Y. Izumi, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2013, 257, 171–186; (d) F. Liao, Z. Zeng, C. Eley, Q. Lu,
X. Hong and S. C. E. Tsang, Angew. Chem., 2012, 124, 5934–
5938.
3 (a) H.-Y. Li, J. Wu, X.-H. Zhou, L.-C. Kang, D.-P. Li, Y. Sui,
Y.-H. Zhou, Y.-X. Zheng, J.-L. Zuo and X.-Z. You, Dalton
Trans., 2009, 10563–10569; (b) J. Costamagna, G. Ferraudi,
J. Canales and J. Vargas, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1996, 148, 221–
248.
4 (a) X.-T. Zhou, H.-B. Ji and X.-J. Huang, Molecules, 2012, 17,
1149–1158; (b) Z. Zhao, J. Fan, M. Xie and Z. Wang, J.
Cleaner Prod., 2009, 17, 1025–1029; (c) Z. Wang, W. Mao,
H. Chen, F. Zhang, X. Fan and G. Qian, Catal. Commun.,
2006, 7, 518–522.
5 A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 183–191.
6 (a) X.-F. Zhang and Q. Xi, Carbon, 2011, 49, 3842–3850; (b)
X. Zhang, L. Hou, A. Cnossen, A. C. Coleman,
O. Ivashenko, P. Rudolf, B. J. vanWees, W. R. Browne and
B. L. Feringa, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 8957–8964; (c)
A. Adan-Mas and D. Wei, Nanomaterials, 2013, 3, 325–356.
7 (a) K. P. Loh, Q. Bao, P. K. Ang and J. Yang, J. Mater. Chem.,
2010, 20, 2277–2289; (b) V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das,
S. I. Khondaker and S. Seal, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2011, 56,
1178–1271; (c) H. Bai, C. Li and G. Shi, Adv. Mater., 2011,
23, 1089–1115.
8 L. Dai, D. W. Chang, J.-B. Baek and W. Lu, Small, 2012, 8,
1130–1166.
9 H.-C. Hsu, I. Shown, H.-Y. Wei, Y.-C. Chang, H.-Y. Du,
Y.-G. Lin, C.-A. Tseng, C.-H. Wang, L.-C. Chen, Y.-C. Lind
and K.-H. Chen, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 262–268.
Immobilization of complex 1 to the phen-GO support29
Phen-GO and the [(bpy)2Ru(bpm)RuCl2(bpm)Ru(bpy)2](PF6)4
complex were added to a round-bottomed ask containing
ethanol. The resulting suspension was reuxed in the dark
under a N2 atmosphere for 24 h. Aer being cooled at room
temperature, the graphene oxide-immobilized ruthenium
complex (Ru–phen-GO) 2 was separated by centrifugation and
washed with ethanol until it became colorless, aer the removal
of the unreacted complex. ICP-AES analysis of the sample
showed 4.1 wt% ruthenium in the synthesized heterogeneous
material. Elemental analysis of the synthesized material showed
C (%), 56.13; H (%) 3.20 and N (%) 4.43.
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction experiment
The photocatalytic reduction was carried out under visible light
by using a 20 watt white cold LED ood light (model no. -HP-FL-
20W-F-Hope LED Opto-Electric Co. Ltd). The reaction vessel
(dia. 5 cm) was kept about 3 cm away from the light source and
the intensity of the light at the vessel was 85 W mꢁ2, as
measured by an intensity meter. The vessel was initially charged
with DMF (30 ml), triethylamine (10 ml) and deionized water (10
ml) and then the solution was degassed by purging with
nitrogen for 30 min under vigorous stirring. Then the photo-
catalyst (0.1 g) was added and the resulting suspension was
saturated with CO2. The vessel was sealed, illuminated with a
light source and the samples were collected at 2 h intervals. The
samples were collected using a long needle and the catalyst was
removed with the help of a syringe lter (2 nm PTFE, 13 mm
diameter). The quantitative determination of methanol over
time was performed using a gas chromatography-ame ioniza-
tion detector (GC-FID) equipped with a 30 m long Stabilwax® w/
Integra-Guard® column, at a ow rate of 0.5 ml minꢁ1, an
ꢃ
injector temperature of 250 C and an FID temperature of 275
ꢃC. A calibration curve was used for quantication and for the
conrmation of the linear response of the GC-FID system 10 (a) R. Yamuna, S. Ramakrishnan, K. Dhara, R. Devi,
(Fig. S7†). To evaluate the concentration of methanol produced
N. K. Kothurkar, E. Kirubha and P. K. Palanisamy, J.
11252 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 11246–11253
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014