8
application in the asymmetric addition to imines is rare. The
only example of catalytic asymmetric addition of arylboronic
acids to N-diphenylphosphinoylbenzaldimine was reported
by Ellman for a limited set of substrates.8a,9 Recently, we
reported that the rhodium complexes with spiro monophos-
phite ligands were efficient catalysts for the asymmetric
addition of arylboronic acids to aromatic aldehydes, produc-
ing diarylmethanols in high ee values.10 Herein, we wish to
present the highly enantioselective addition of arylboronic
acids to N-tosylarylimines catalyzed by Rh complexes with
a spiro monophosphite ligand (S)-ShiP. This investigation
expands the scope of application of arylboronic acids as aryl
sources and provides a practical entry to the synthesis of
optically active diarylmethylamines.
Figure 1. Tested chiral ligand.
We began our experiment under the identical conditions
used in our previous study of rhodium-catalyzed addition of
phenylboronic acid to aldehydes.10 The reaction of phenyl-
boronic acid and N-tosyl-4-chlorobenzaldehyde imine 7a
was performed in aqueous toluene at 35 °C using [RhCl-
a spirobiindane scaffold gave the desired product 9aa in
5
8-69% yields with 62-84% ee (Table 1, entries 7-9),
though these were lower than those obtained with ligand
. However, the binaphthol-based ligands 5 (MeO-MOP)
1
2 2 2
(CH CH )] (3 mol % of Rh) as a precatalyst and (S)-ShiP
and 6 (BINAP) were found to be less efficient in this reac-
tion in terms of either reactivity or enantioselectivity (en-
tries 10 and 11). These results indicated that the spiro mono-
dentate ligands having a large dihedral angle backbone,
especially (S)-ShiP, were crucial for efficient control of enan-
tioselectivity in the Rh-catalyzed addition of arylboronic
acids to imines. The use of KF as an additive is important
for achieving high yield. For example, the reaction in the
absence of KF gave only 25% of the addition product, while
the reactions with 2 or 4 equiv of KF provided the addi-
tion product in 77% and 85% yield, respectively (entries 6
and 13).
as a chiral ligand. The addition product 9aa was gratifyingly
obtained in 70% yield with 89% ee after 20 h (Table 1, entry
a
b
entry
[Rh]
ligand yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[RhCl(C2H4)2]2
[Rh(COD)(MeCN)2]BF4
Rh(COD)2BF4
[Rh(COD)2Cl]2
Rh(acac)(CO)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
Rh(acac)(C2H4)2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
75
72
43
56
70
77
69
58
63
30
9
89
19
49
48
81
93
83
62
84
13
10
88
Having established an optimal protocol, the arylation of a
variety of aromatic imines was examined (Scheme 1) with
3
2 4 2
mol % of Rh(acac)(C H ) /(S)-ShiP catalyst at 35 °C in
aqueous toluene. The results are summarized in Table 2.
Interestingly, the imines bearing both electron-donating and
-withdrawing groups are tolerated in the arylation reaction
with arylboronic acids. Furthermore, the positions of sub-
stituents of imine substrates is not restrictive for obtaining
high enantioselectivites, as the phenylations of para-, meta-,
and ortho-subsitituted arylimines were all successful to give
the desired products in 92-96% ee (Table 2, entries 1-10).
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
25
85
c
d
93 (99)
1
-Naphthaldehyde imine 7k and 2-furaldehyde imine 7l can
a
b
Isolated yield after chromatography. Determined by chiral HPLC using
also react with phenylboronic acid to produce the corre-
sponding addition products in 76% yield with 96% ee and
c
d
a Chiralcel OD column. With 4 equiv of KF. After a simple recrystal-
lization.
(7) For rhodium-catalyzed addition of arylboronic acids to aldehydes,
imines and R,â-unsaturated compounds, see reviews: (a) Fagnou, K.;
Lautens, M. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 169. (b) Hayashi, T.; Yamasaki, K.
Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2829.
1
). Hydrolysis of imine was the main side reaction, which
became substantial when the reaction was carried out in
solvents other than toluene.11 Other Rh(I) compounds as
precursors were also investigated with ligand 1 (entries 2-6).
The use of cationic [Rh(COD)(MeCN)
conditions gave a comparable yield (72%) but a lower
enantioselectivity (19%). The Rh(acac)(C emerged as
the best choice of catalyst precursors, affording the addition
product in good yield (77%) and high ee (93%).
Encouraged by this result, we tested different chiral ligands
shown in Figure 1. The monodentate ligands 2-4 containing
(
8) For the diastereoselective addition of arylboronic acids to chiral
sulfinimines, see: (a) Weix, D. J.; Shi, Y.-L.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 1092. (b) Bolshan, Y.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1
481.
2 4
]BF under the same
(9) When this manuscript was submmited, a related publication by
Feringa and Minnaard on the addition of arylboronic acids to N-sulfamonyl
aldimines using phosphoramidite ligands appeared on the Internet: Jagt,
R. B. C.; Toullec, P. Y.; Geerdink, D.; de Vries, J. G.; Feringa, B. L.;
Minnaard, A. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2789.
(10) Duan, H.-F.; Xie, J.-H.; Shi, W.-J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Q.-L. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 1479.
2 4 2
H )
(11) The reactions in aqueous ClCH2CH2Cl, MeOCH2CH2OMe, THF,
dioxane, and i-PrOH all gave the isolated yield of 9aa below 40%.
2568
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 12, 2006